A Review of the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model: Recent Advances, Expanded Paradigms, and Recommendations for Future Research
Since its introduction approximately 20 years ago, the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model (CHM) has been widely accepted both among academic and practitioner audiences. The model posits that workplace stressors can be grouped into two categories. Hindrance stressors will interfere with performance or...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560346/full |
id |
doaj-cdc7fcef745949bdac93e63893acde83 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cdc7fcef745949bdac93e63893acde832020-11-25T04:08:37ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-11-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.560346560346A Review of the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model: Recent Advances, Expanded Paradigms, and Recommendations for Future ResearchKristin A. HoranWheeler H. NakaharaMichael J. DiStasoSteve M. JexSince its introduction approximately 20 years ago, the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model (CHM) has been widely accepted both among academic and practitioner audiences. The model posits that workplace stressors can be grouped into two categories. Hindrance stressors will interfere with performance or goals, while challenge stressors contribute to performance opportunities. These two categories of stressors are theorized to exhibit differential relationships with strain, with hindrance stressors being more consistently linked to psychological, physical, or behavioral strain compared to challenge stressors. Despite the popularity of this model, recent evidence suggests that the proposed differential relationship hypothesis has not consistently held true for all types of strain. Thus, a reexamination or modification of this paradigm is clearly warranted. In the present review, we describe existing evidence surrounding the CHM and describe the rationale for a shifting paradigm. We outline recent advances in research using the CHM, such as novel moderators and mediators, the need to explicitly measure challenge and hindrance appraisal and differentiate between hindrance and threat appraisal, the dynamic nature of these appraisals over time, and the recognition that a single stressor could be appraised simultaneously as both a challenge and a hindrance. Finally, we provide recommendations and future research directions for scholars examining stress and stress management through a CHM lens, including recommendations related to study design, the measurement of stressors, the integration of CHM with other models of stress, and interventions for stress management.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560346/fullappraisaloccupational stress modelstressorchallengehindrance |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kristin A. Horan Wheeler H. Nakahara Michael J. DiStaso Steve M. Jex |
spellingShingle |
Kristin A. Horan Wheeler H. Nakahara Michael J. DiStaso Steve M. Jex A Review of the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model: Recent Advances, Expanded Paradigms, and Recommendations for Future Research Frontiers in Psychology appraisal occupational stress model stressor challenge hindrance |
author_facet |
Kristin A. Horan Wheeler H. Nakahara Michael J. DiStaso Steve M. Jex |
author_sort |
Kristin A. Horan |
title |
A Review of the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model: Recent Advances, Expanded Paradigms, and Recommendations for Future Research |
title_short |
A Review of the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model: Recent Advances, Expanded Paradigms, and Recommendations for Future Research |
title_full |
A Review of the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model: Recent Advances, Expanded Paradigms, and Recommendations for Future Research |
title_fullStr |
A Review of the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model: Recent Advances, Expanded Paradigms, and Recommendations for Future Research |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Review of the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model: Recent Advances, Expanded Paradigms, and Recommendations for Future Research |
title_sort |
review of the challenge-hindrance stress model: recent advances, expanded paradigms, and recommendations for future research |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
Since its introduction approximately 20 years ago, the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model (CHM) has been widely accepted both among academic and practitioner audiences. The model posits that workplace stressors can be grouped into two categories. Hindrance stressors will interfere with performance or goals, while challenge stressors contribute to performance opportunities. These two categories of stressors are theorized to exhibit differential relationships with strain, with hindrance stressors being more consistently linked to psychological, physical, or behavioral strain compared to challenge stressors. Despite the popularity of this model, recent evidence suggests that the proposed differential relationship hypothesis has not consistently held true for all types of strain. Thus, a reexamination or modification of this paradigm is clearly warranted. In the present review, we describe existing evidence surrounding the CHM and describe the rationale for a shifting paradigm. We outline recent advances in research using the CHM, such as novel moderators and mediators, the need to explicitly measure challenge and hindrance appraisal and differentiate between hindrance and threat appraisal, the dynamic nature of these appraisals over time, and the recognition that a single stressor could be appraised simultaneously as both a challenge and a hindrance. Finally, we provide recommendations and future research directions for scholars examining stress and stress management through a CHM lens, including recommendations related to study design, the measurement of stressors, the integration of CHM with other models of stress, and interventions for stress management. |
topic |
appraisal occupational stress model stressor challenge hindrance |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560346/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kristinahoran areviewofthechallengehindrancestressmodelrecentadvancesexpandedparadigmsandrecommendationsforfutureresearch AT wheelerhnakahara areviewofthechallengehindrancestressmodelrecentadvancesexpandedparadigmsandrecommendationsforfutureresearch AT michaeljdistaso areviewofthechallengehindrancestressmodelrecentadvancesexpandedparadigmsandrecommendationsforfutureresearch AT stevemjex areviewofthechallengehindrancestressmodelrecentadvancesexpandedparadigmsandrecommendationsforfutureresearch AT kristinahoran reviewofthechallengehindrancestressmodelrecentadvancesexpandedparadigmsandrecommendationsforfutureresearch AT wheelerhnakahara reviewofthechallengehindrancestressmodelrecentadvancesexpandedparadigmsandrecommendationsforfutureresearch AT michaeljdistaso reviewofthechallengehindrancestressmodelrecentadvancesexpandedparadigmsandrecommendationsforfutureresearch AT stevemjex reviewofthechallengehindrancestressmodelrecentadvancesexpandedparadigmsandrecommendationsforfutureresearch |
_version_ |
1724424879494660096 |