A Review of the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model: Recent Advances, Expanded Paradigms, and Recommendations for Future Research

Since its introduction approximately 20 years ago, the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model (CHM) has been widely accepted both among academic and practitioner audiences. The model posits that workplace stressors can be grouped into two categories. Hindrance stressors will interfere with performance or...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristin A. Horan, Wheeler H. Nakahara, Michael J. DiStaso, Steve M. Jex
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560346/full
id doaj-cdc7fcef745949bdac93e63893acde83
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cdc7fcef745949bdac93e63893acde832020-11-25T04:08:37ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-11-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.560346560346A Review of the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model: Recent Advances, Expanded Paradigms, and Recommendations for Future ResearchKristin A. HoranWheeler H. NakaharaMichael J. DiStasoSteve M. JexSince its introduction approximately 20 years ago, the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model (CHM) has been widely accepted both among academic and practitioner audiences. The model posits that workplace stressors can be grouped into two categories. Hindrance stressors will interfere with performance or goals, while challenge stressors contribute to performance opportunities. These two categories of stressors are theorized to exhibit differential relationships with strain, with hindrance stressors being more consistently linked to psychological, physical, or behavioral strain compared to challenge stressors. Despite the popularity of this model, recent evidence suggests that the proposed differential relationship hypothesis has not consistently held true for all types of strain. Thus, a reexamination or modification of this paradigm is clearly warranted. In the present review, we describe existing evidence surrounding the CHM and describe the rationale for a shifting paradigm. We outline recent advances in research using the CHM, such as novel moderators and mediators, the need to explicitly measure challenge and hindrance appraisal and differentiate between hindrance and threat appraisal, the dynamic nature of these appraisals over time, and the recognition that a single stressor could be appraised simultaneously as both a challenge and a hindrance. Finally, we provide recommendations and future research directions for scholars examining stress and stress management through a CHM lens, including recommendations related to study design, the measurement of stressors, the integration of CHM with other models of stress, and interventions for stress management.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560346/fullappraisaloccupational stress modelstressorchallengehindrance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kristin A. Horan
Wheeler H. Nakahara
Michael J. DiStaso
Steve M. Jex
spellingShingle Kristin A. Horan
Wheeler H. Nakahara
Michael J. DiStaso
Steve M. Jex
A Review of the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model: Recent Advances, Expanded Paradigms, and Recommendations for Future Research
Frontiers in Psychology
appraisal
occupational stress model
stressor
challenge
hindrance
author_facet Kristin A. Horan
Wheeler H. Nakahara
Michael J. DiStaso
Steve M. Jex
author_sort Kristin A. Horan
title A Review of the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model: Recent Advances, Expanded Paradigms, and Recommendations for Future Research
title_short A Review of the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model: Recent Advances, Expanded Paradigms, and Recommendations for Future Research
title_full A Review of the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model: Recent Advances, Expanded Paradigms, and Recommendations for Future Research
title_fullStr A Review of the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model: Recent Advances, Expanded Paradigms, and Recommendations for Future Research
title_full_unstemmed A Review of the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model: Recent Advances, Expanded Paradigms, and Recommendations for Future Research
title_sort review of the challenge-hindrance stress model: recent advances, expanded paradigms, and recommendations for future research
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Since its introduction approximately 20 years ago, the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model (CHM) has been widely accepted both among academic and practitioner audiences. The model posits that workplace stressors can be grouped into two categories. Hindrance stressors will interfere with performance or goals, while challenge stressors contribute to performance opportunities. These two categories of stressors are theorized to exhibit differential relationships with strain, with hindrance stressors being more consistently linked to psychological, physical, or behavioral strain compared to challenge stressors. Despite the popularity of this model, recent evidence suggests that the proposed differential relationship hypothesis has not consistently held true for all types of strain. Thus, a reexamination or modification of this paradigm is clearly warranted. In the present review, we describe existing evidence surrounding the CHM and describe the rationale for a shifting paradigm. We outline recent advances in research using the CHM, such as novel moderators and mediators, the need to explicitly measure challenge and hindrance appraisal and differentiate between hindrance and threat appraisal, the dynamic nature of these appraisals over time, and the recognition that a single stressor could be appraised simultaneously as both a challenge and a hindrance. Finally, we provide recommendations and future research directions for scholars examining stress and stress management through a CHM lens, including recommendations related to study design, the measurement of stressors, the integration of CHM with other models of stress, and interventions for stress management.
topic appraisal
occupational stress model
stressor
challenge
hindrance
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560346/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kristinahoran areviewofthechallengehindrancestressmodelrecentadvancesexpandedparadigmsandrecommendationsforfutureresearch
AT wheelerhnakahara areviewofthechallengehindrancestressmodelrecentadvancesexpandedparadigmsandrecommendationsforfutureresearch
AT michaeljdistaso areviewofthechallengehindrancestressmodelrecentadvancesexpandedparadigmsandrecommendationsforfutureresearch
AT stevemjex areviewofthechallengehindrancestressmodelrecentadvancesexpandedparadigmsandrecommendationsforfutureresearch
AT kristinahoran reviewofthechallengehindrancestressmodelrecentadvancesexpandedparadigmsandrecommendationsforfutureresearch
AT wheelerhnakahara reviewofthechallengehindrancestressmodelrecentadvancesexpandedparadigmsandrecommendationsforfutureresearch
AT michaeljdistaso reviewofthechallengehindrancestressmodelrecentadvancesexpandedparadigmsandrecommendationsforfutureresearch
AT stevemjex reviewofthechallengehindrancestressmodelrecentadvancesexpandedparadigmsandrecommendationsforfutureresearch
_version_ 1724424879494660096