Comparison of two different barbed suture materials for end-to-end jejuno-jejunal anastomosis in pigs

Abstract Background Hand-sewn intestinal anastomoses are a fundamental procedure in both open and laparoscopic intestinal surgery. Self-retaining barbed suture devices have been tested for a variety of surgical applications. With the exception of clinical reports and various experimental studies on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gessica Giusto, Selina Iussich, Massimiliano Tursi, Giovanni Perona, Marco Gandini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-01-01
Series:Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13028-018-0437-x
id doaj-cdd88da089434d85a2c03d7abf133581
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cdd88da089434d85a2c03d7abf1335812020-11-25T02:14:01ZengBMCActa Veterinaria Scandinavica1751-01472019-01-016111810.1186/s13028-018-0437-xComparison of two different barbed suture materials for end-to-end jejuno-jejunal anastomosis in pigsGessica Giusto0Selina Iussich1Massimiliano Tursi2Giovanni Perona3Marco Gandini4Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of TurinDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of TurinDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of TurinDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of TurinDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of TurinAbstract Background Hand-sewn intestinal anastomoses are a fundamental procedure in both open and laparoscopic intestinal surgery. Self-retaining barbed suture devices have been tested for a variety of surgical applications. With the exception of clinical reports and various experimental studies on enterotomy, little has been published so far on the use of barbed suture for end-to-end intestinal anastomoses. The aim of the study was to compare two different barbed suture materials for end-to-end jejuno-jejunal anastomosis in pigs. End-to-end jejuno-jejunal anastomosis were performed with unidirectional barbed (A group), bidirectional barbed (B group) or normal (C group) sutures in each animal. A comparison was then made between the groups based on adhesions scoring, suturing time, bursting pressure and histopathology. Results Mean construction times in the A group (518 ± 40 s) and in the B group (487 ± 45 s) were significantly lower than in the C group (587 ± 63 s) but were not different between A and B group (P = 0.10). Mean bursting pressures were significantly higher in the intact intestine (197 ± 13 mmHg) than in any other group (group A 150 ± 16 mmHg, group B 145 ± 22 mmHg, group C 145 ± 24 mmHg). Among anastomotic techniques, the bursting pressures were not significantly different. Histologically no difference could be detected in the grade of inflammation, collagen deposition and neovascularization at the anastomotic sites. Conclusions Barbed sutures can be effectively used for handsewn end-to-end jejunojejunal anastomosis in pigs. They are comparable to normal suture but could provide a shorter surgical time.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13028-018-0437-xBarbed sutureEnd-to-end anastomosisJejunojejunalPigs
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gessica Giusto
Selina Iussich
Massimiliano Tursi
Giovanni Perona
Marco Gandini
spellingShingle Gessica Giusto
Selina Iussich
Massimiliano Tursi
Giovanni Perona
Marco Gandini
Comparison of two different barbed suture materials for end-to-end jejuno-jejunal anastomosis in pigs
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
Barbed suture
End-to-end anastomosis
Jejunojejunal
Pigs
author_facet Gessica Giusto
Selina Iussich
Massimiliano Tursi
Giovanni Perona
Marco Gandini
author_sort Gessica Giusto
title Comparison of two different barbed suture materials for end-to-end jejuno-jejunal anastomosis in pigs
title_short Comparison of two different barbed suture materials for end-to-end jejuno-jejunal anastomosis in pigs
title_full Comparison of two different barbed suture materials for end-to-end jejuno-jejunal anastomosis in pigs
title_fullStr Comparison of two different barbed suture materials for end-to-end jejuno-jejunal anastomosis in pigs
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two different barbed suture materials for end-to-end jejuno-jejunal anastomosis in pigs
title_sort comparison of two different barbed suture materials for end-to-end jejuno-jejunal anastomosis in pigs
publisher BMC
series Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
issn 1751-0147
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Abstract Background Hand-sewn intestinal anastomoses are a fundamental procedure in both open and laparoscopic intestinal surgery. Self-retaining barbed suture devices have been tested for a variety of surgical applications. With the exception of clinical reports and various experimental studies on enterotomy, little has been published so far on the use of barbed suture for end-to-end intestinal anastomoses. The aim of the study was to compare two different barbed suture materials for end-to-end jejuno-jejunal anastomosis in pigs. End-to-end jejuno-jejunal anastomosis were performed with unidirectional barbed (A group), bidirectional barbed (B group) or normal (C group) sutures in each animal. A comparison was then made between the groups based on adhesions scoring, suturing time, bursting pressure and histopathology. Results Mean construction times in the A group (518 ± 40 s) and in the B group (487 ± 45 s) were significantly lower than in the C group (587 ± 63 s) but were not different between A and B group (P = 0.10). Mean bursting pressures were significantly higher in the intact intestine (197 ± 13 mmHg) than in any other group (group A 150 ± 16 mmHg, group B 145 ± 22 mmHg, group C 145 ± 24 mmHg). Among anastomotic techniques, the bursting pressures were not significantly different. Histologically no difference could be detected in the grade of inflammation, collagen deposition and neovascularization at the anastomotic sites. Conclusions Barbed sutures can be effectively used for handsewn end-to-end jejunojejunal anastomosis in pigs. They are comparable to normal suture but could provide a shorter surgical time.
topic Barbed suture
End-to-end anastomosis
Jejunojejunal
Pigs
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13028-018-0437-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gessicagiusto comparisonoftwodifferentbarbedsuturematerialsforendtoendjejunojejunalanastomosisinpigs
AT selinaiussich comparisonoftwodifferentbarbedsuturematerialsforendtoendjejunojejunalanastomosisinpigs
AT massimilianotursi comparisonoftwodifferentbarbedsuturematerialsforendtoendjejunojejunalanastomosisinpigs
AT giovanniperona comparisonoftwodifferentbarbedsuturematerialsforendtoendjejunojejunalanastomosisinpigs
AT marcogandini comparisonoftwodifferentbarbedsuturematerialsforendtoendjejunojejunalanastomosisinpigs
_version_ 1724902523744026624