Reirradiation for Recurrent Scalp Angiosarcoma: Dosimetric Advantage of PBT over VMAT and EBT

Purpose: Reirradiation in the scalp area can be challenging given the proximity to organs at risk (OARs), such as the eye and brain. Our aim is to evaluate the dosimetric differences of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and electron beam therapy (EBT) compared with 3-dimensional proton beam th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tal Eitan, Nicholas J. Damico, Rajesh Pidikiti, Michael Z. Kharouta, Donald Dobbins, Frederick B. Jesseph, Mark Smith, Ankit Mangla, Theodoros N. Teknos, David B. Mansur, Mitchell Machtay, Min Yao, Aashish D. Bhatt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Particle Therapy Co-operative Group 2020-02-01
Series:International Journal of Particle Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://theijpt.org/doi/pdf/10.14338/IJPT-19-00074
id doaj-cdedd5e4554e4c30b6755e9ea4c77f74
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cdedd5e4554e4c30b6755e9ea4c77f742020-11-25T02:33:54ZengParticle Therapy Co-operative GroupInternational Journal of Particle Therapy2331-51802020-02-0163131810.14338/IJPT-19-000742331-5180-6-3-13Reirradiation for Recurrent Scalp Angiosarcoma: Dosimetric Advantage of PBT over VMAT and EBTTal Eitan0Nicholas J. Damico1Rajesh Pidikiti2Michael Z. Kharouta3Donald Dobbins4Frederick B. Jesseph5Mark Smith6Ankit Mangla7Theodoros N. Teknos8David B. Mansur9Mitchell Machtay10Min Yao11Aashish D. Bhatt12Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USAPurpose: Reirradiation in the scalp area can be challenging given the proximity to organs at risk (OARs), such as the eye and brain. Our aim is to evaluate the dosimetric differences of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and electron beam therapy (EBT) compared with 3-dimensional proton beam therapy (PBT). Patients and Methods: We evaluated a patient with recurrent angiosarcoma of the left temporal scalp after prior surgical resections and radiation therapy to 60 Gy in 30 fractions who needed reirradiation. We generated VMAT, EBT, and PBT plans using the Pinnacle Treatment Planning System (TPS). Both VMAT and EBT plans used a skin bolus, whereas no bolus was used for the proton plan. Doses to the OARs, including cochlea, eyes, lens, lacrimal glands, optic nerves, optic chiasm, pituitary gland, and underlying brain, were compared. Results: The reirradiation treatment dose was 60 Gy(RBE). Target volume coverage was comparable in all plans. Compared with VMAT and EBT, the PBT plan showed reductions in mean and maximum doses to all OARs. Without the use of protons, several OARs would have exceeded dose tolerance utilizing VMAT or electrons. Dose reduction of up to 100% was achieved for central and contralateral OARs. Conclusion: Compared with VMAT and EBT, PBT resulted in dose reductions to all OARs, while maintaining excellent target coverage. PBT showed a significant advantage in treating superficially located skin cancers, such as angiosarcoma, without the need for a bolus. PBT can be considered in the upfront treatment and certainly in the reirradiation setting.https://theijpt.org/doi/pdf/10.14338/IJPT-19-00074proton beam therapybragg peakangiosarcomaorgan at risk preventionperiorbital tumors
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tal Eitan
Nicholas J. Damico
Rajesh Pidikiti
Michael Z. Kharouta
Donald Dobbins
Frederick B. Jesseph
Mark Smith
Ankit Mangla
Theodoros N. Teknos
David B. Mansur
Mitchell Machtay
Min Yao
Aashish D. Bhatt
spellingShingle Tal Eitan
Nicholas J. Damico
Rajesh Pidikiti
Michael Z. Kharouta
Donald Dobbins
Frederick B. Jesseph
Mark Smith
Ankit Mangla
Theodoros N. Teknos
David B. Mansur
Mitchell Machtay
Min Yao
Aashish D. Bhatt
Reirradiation for Recurrent Scalp Angiosarcoma: Dosimetric Advantage of PBT over VMAT and EBT
International Journal of Particle Therapy
proton beam therapy
bragg peak
angiosarcoma
organ at risk prevention
periorbital tumors
author_facet Tal Eitan
Nicholas J. Damico
Rajesh Pidikiti
Michael Z. Kharouta
Donald Dobbins
Frederick B. Jesseph
Mark Smith
Ankit Mangla
Theodoros N. Teknos
David B. Mansur
Mitchell Machtay
Min Yao
Aashish D. Bhatt
author_sort Tal Eitan
title Reirradiation for Recurrent Scalp Angiosarcoma: Dosimetric Advantage of PBT over VMAT and EBT
title_short Reirradiation for Recurrent Scalp Angiosarcoma: Dosimetric Advantage of PBT over VMAT and EBT
title_full Reirradiation for Recurrent Scalp Angiosarcoma: Dosimetric Advantage of PBT over VMAT and EBT
title_fullStr Reirradiation for Recurrent Scalp Angiosarcoma: Dosimetric Advantage of PBT over VMAT and EBT
title_full_unstemmed Reirradiation for Recurrent Scalp Angiosarcoma: Dosimetric Advantage of PBT over VMAT and EBT
title_sort reirradiation for recurrent scalp angiosarcoma: dosimetric advantage of pbt over vmat and ebt
publisher Particle Therapy Co-operative Group
series International Journal of Particle Therapy
issn 2331-5180
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Purpose: Reirradiation in the scalp area can be challenging given the proximity to organs at risk (OARs), such as the eye and brain. Our aim is to evaluate the dosimetric differences of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and electron beam therapy (EBT) compared with 3-dimensional proton beam therapy (PBT). Patients and Methods: We evaluated a patient with recurrent angiosarcoma of the left temporal scalp after prior surgical resections and radiation therapy to 60 Gy in 30 fractions who needed reirradiation. We generated VMAT, EBT, and PBT plans using the Pinnacle Treatment Planning System (TPS). Both VMAT and EBT plans used a skin bolus, whereas no bolus was used for the proton plan. Doses to the OARs, including cochlea, eyes, lens, lacrimal glands, optic nerves, optic chiasm, pituitary gland, and underlying brain, were compared. Results: The reirradiation treatment dose was 60 Gy(RBE). Target volume coverage was comparable in all plans. Compared with VMAT and EBT, the PBT plan showed reductions in mean and maximum doses to all OARs. Without the use of protons, several OARs would have exceeded dose tolerance utilizing VMAT or electrons. Dose reduction of up to 100% was achieved for central and contralateral OARs. Conclusion: Compared with VMAT and EBT, PBT resulted in dose reductions to all OARs, while maintaining excellent target coverage. PBT showed a significant advantage in treating superficially located skin cancers, such as angiosarcoma, without the need for a bolus. PBT can be considered in the upfront treatment and certainly in the reirradiation setting.
topic proton beam therapy
bragg peak
angiosarcoma
organ at risk prevention
periorbital tumors
url https://theijpt.org/doi/pdf/10.14338/IJPT-19-00074
work_keys_str_mv AT taleitan reirradiationforrecurrentscalpangiosarcomadosimetricadvantageofpbtovervmatandebt
AT nicholasjdamico reirradiationforrecurrentscalpangiosarcomadosimetricadvantageofpbtovervmatandebt
AT rajeshpidikiti reirradiationforrecurrentscalpangiosarcomadosimetricadvantageofpbtovervmatandebt
AT michaelzkharouta reirradiationforrecurrentscalpangiosarcomadosimetricadvantageofpbtovervmatandebt
AT donalddobbins reirradiationforrecurrentscalpangiosarcomadosimetricadvantageofpbtovervmatandebt
AT frederickbjesseph reirradiationforrecurrentscalpangiosarcomadosimetricadvantageofpbtovervmatandebt
AT marksmith reirradiationforrecurrentscalpangiosarcomadosimetricadvantageofpbtovervmatandebt
AT ankitmangla reirradiationforrecurrentscalpangiosarcomadosimetricadvantageofpbtovervmatandebt
AT theodorosnteknos reirradiationforrecurrentscalpangiosarcomadosimetricadvantageofpbtovervmatandebt
AT davidbmansur reirradiationforrecurrentscalpangiosarcomadosimetricadvantageofpbtovervmatandebt
AT mitchellmachtay reirradiationforrecurrentscalpangiosarcomadosimetricadvantageofpbtovervmatandebt
AT minyao reirradiationforrecurrentscalpangiosarcomadosimetricadvantageofpbtovervmatandebt
AT aashishdbhatt reirradiationforrecurrentscalpangiosarcomadosimetricadvantageofpbtovervmatandebt
_version_ 1724811663879700480