A Study of Patient Satisfaction With Healthcare in Zenica-Doboj Canton

Aim: Patient satisfaction and patient evaluation of healthcare can be seen as important results of provided care, as they reflect the level to which the patient’s subjective and objective needs have been met. The aim was to evaluate patient satisfaction with healthcare and compare the results for 20...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Šeila Cilović Lagarija, Elma Kuduzović, Nino Hasanica, Sead Begagić, Amela Džubur-Alić, Delila Lisica
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Medicine Osijek 2020-11-01
Series:Southeastern European Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://seemedj.mefos.unios.hr/index.php/seemedj/article/view/152/92
id doaj-cdf496ccb10045a2b088c2de7495c47b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cdf496ccb10045a2b088c2de7495c47b2020-11-25T04:10:47ZengFaculty of Medicine OsijekSoutheastern European Medical Journal2459-94842020-11-014212913510.26332/seemedj.v4i2.152A Study of Patient Satisfaction With Healthcare in Zenica-Doboj CantonŠeila Cilović Lagarija0Elma Kuduzović1Nino Hasanica2Sead Begagić3Amela Džubur-Alić4Delila Lisica5Public Health Institute of the Federation of Bosnia and HerzegovinaHealth and Food Safety Institute Zenica, Bosnia and HerzegovinaHealth and Food Safety Institute Zenica, Bosnia and HerzegovinaHealth and Food Safety Institute Zenica, Bosnia and HerzegovinaSchool of Medicine, University in Sarajevo, Bosnia and HerzegovinaSchool of Medicine, University in Sarajevo, Bosnia and HerzegovinaAim: Patient satisfaction and patient evaluation of healthcare can be seen as important results of provided care, as they reflect the level to which the patient’s subjective and objective needs have been met. The aim was to evaluate patient satisfaction with healthcare and compare the results for 2017 with the results from 2011. Methods: The study was conducted in the territory of Zenica-Doboj Canton in May 2011 and in October 2017. A questionnaire was filled out by 2,008 examinees in 2011 and by 2,000 examinees in 2017 outside healthcare institutions (in the street), using the EUROPEP questionnaire as a research instrument. The average age of the respondents was 38.4. The participants in the study were 52 % male and 48 % female. Student’s T-test was used to compare the results between the two samples. Results: A statistically significant difference was observed between the mean patient satisfaction in 2011 (3.19 ± 0.3, min. = 2.6, max. = 3.83, P = 0.00032) and the mean patient satisfaction in 2017 (3.47 ± 0.17, min. = 3.14, max. = 3.94, P = 0.000647), t(23) = 3.75. Increase in patient satisfaction in 2017 is evident compared to their satisfaction in 2011. Conclusion: Surveying the satisfaction of healthcare recipients should be a common method of work as it gives the patients the impression that their opinion is valued, while at the same time it indicates to healthcare staff that their attitudes may need to be changed, their knowledge expanded and the organization of work improved, if they want to provide services of improved quality.http://seemedj.mefos.unios.hr/index.php/seemedj/article/view/152/92patient satisfactionhealthcareeuropep
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Šeila Cilović Lagarija
Elma Kuduzović
Nino Hasanica
Sead Begagić
Amela Džubur-Alić
Delila Lisica
spellingShingle Šeila Cilović Lagarija
Elma Kuduzović
Nino Hasanica
Sead Begagić
Amela Džubur-Alić
Delila Lisica
A Study of Patient Satisfaction With Healthcare in Zenica-Doboj Canton
Southeastern European Medical Journal
patient satisfaction
healthcare
europep
author_facet Šeila Cilović Lagarija
Elma Kuduzović
Nino Hasanica
Sead Begagić
Amela Džubur-Alić
Delila Lisica
author_sort Šeila Cilović Lagarija
title A Study of Patient Satisfaction With Healthcare in Zenica-Doboj Canton
title_short A Study of Patient Satisfaction With Healthcare in Zenica-Doboj Canton
title_full A Study of Patient Satisfaction With Healthcare in Zenica-Doboj Canton
title_fullStr A Study of Patient Satisfaction With Healthcare in Zenica-Doboj Canton
title_full_unstemmed A Study of Patient Satisfaction With Healthcare in Zenica-Doboj Canton
title_sort study of patient satisfaction with healthcare in zenica-doboj canton
publisher Faculty of Medicine Osijek
series Southeastern European Medical Journal
issn 2459-9484
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Aim: Patient satisfaction and patient evaluation of healthcare can be seen as important results of provided care, as they reflect the level to which the patient’s subjective and objective needs have been met. The aim was to evaluate patient satisfaction with healthcare and compare the results for 2017 with the results from 2011. Methods: The study was conducted in the territory of Zenica-Doboj Canton in May 2011 and in October 2017. A questionnaire was filled out by 2,008 examinees in 2011 and by 2,000 examinees in 2017 outside healthcare institutions (in the street), using the EUROPEP questionnaire as a research instrument. The average age of the respondents was 38.4. The participants in the study were 52 % male and 48 % female. Student’s T-test was used to compare the results between the two samples. Results: A statistically significant difference was observed between the mean patient satisfaction in 2011 (3.19 ± 0.3, min. = 2.6, max. = 3.83, P = 0.00032) and the mean patient satisfaction in 2017 (3.47 ± 0.17, min. = 3.14, max. = 3.94, P = 0.000647), t(23) = 3.75. Increase in patient satisfaction in 2017 is evident compared to their satisfaction in 2011. Conclusion: Surveying the satisfaction of healthcare recipients should be a common method of work as it gives the patients the impression that their opinion is valued, while at the same time it indicates to healthcare staff that their attitudes may need to be changed, their knowledge expanded and the organization of work improved, if they want to provide services of improved quality.
topic patient satisfaction
healthcare
europep
url http://seemedj.mefos.unios.hr/index.php/seemedj/article/view/152/92
work_keys_str_mv AT seilaciloviclagarija astudyofpatientsatisfactionwithhealthcareinzenicadobojcanton
AT elmakuduzovic astudyofpatientsatisfactionwithhealthcareinzenicadobojcanton
AT ninohasanica astudyofpatientsatisfactionwithhealthcareinzenicadobojcanton
AT seadbegagic astudyofpatientsatisfactionwithhealthcareinzenicadobojcanton
AT ameladzuburalic astudyofpatientsatisfactionwithhealthcareinzenicadobojcanton
AT delilalisica astudyofpatientsatisfactionwithhealthcareinzenicadobojcanton
AT seilaciloviclagarija studyofpatientsatisfactionwithhealthcareinzenicadobojcanton
AT elmakuduzovic studyofpatientsatisfactionwithhealthcareinzenicadobojcanton
AT ninohasanica studyofpatientsatisfactionwithhealthcareinzenicadobojcanton
AT seadbegagic studyofpatientsatisfactionwithhealthcareinzenicadobojcanton
AT ameladzuburalic studyofpatientsatisfactionwithhealthcareinzenicadobojcanton
AT delilalisica studyofpatientsatisfactionwithhealthcareinzenicadobojcanton
_version_ 1724419312471506944