Rasch analysis of the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (mini-MAC) among a heterogeneous sample of long-term cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (mini-MAC) is a well-recognised, popular measure of coping in psycho-oncology and assesses five cancer-specific coping strategies. It has been suggested that these five subscales could be gr...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2012-05-01
|
Series: | Health and Quality of Life Outcomes |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.hqlo.com/content/10/1/55 |
id |
doaj-ce0a22d2cd184894b0e1a77ebc4ac9f4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ce0a22d2cd184894b0e1a77ebc4ac9f42020-11-25T00:20:34ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252012-05-011015510.1186/1477-7525-10-55Rasch analysis of the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (mini-MAC) among a heterogeneous sample of long-term cancer survivors: A cross-sectional studyZucca AlisonLambert Sylvie DBoyes Allison WPallant Julie F<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (mini-MAC) is a well-recognised, popular measure of coping in psycho-oncology and assesses five cancer-specific coping strategies. It has been suggested that these five subscales could be grouped to form the over-arching <it>adaptive</it> and <it>maladptive</it> coping subscales to facilitate the interpretation and clinical application of the scale. Despite the popularity of the mini-MAC, few studies have examined its psychometric properties among long-term cancer survivors, and further validation of the mini-MAC is needed to substantiate its use with the growing population of survivors. Therefore, this study examined the psychometric properties and dimensionality of the mini-MAC in a sample of long-term cancer survivors using Rasch analysis.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>RUMM 2030 was used to analyse the mini-MAC data (n=851). Separate Rasch analyses were conducted for each of the original mini-MAC subscales as well as the over-arching adaptive and maladaptive coping subscales to examine summary and individual model fit statistics, person separation index (PSI), response format, local dependency, targeting, item bias (or differential item functioning -DIF), and dimensionality.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>For the fighting spirit, fatalism, and helplessness-hopelessness subscales, a revised three-point response format seemed more optimal than the original four-point response. To achieve model fit, items were deleted from four of the five subscales – Anxious Preoccupation items 7, 25, and 29; Cognitive Avoidance items 11 and 17; Fighting Spirit item 18; and Helplessness-Hopelessness items 16 and 20. For those subscales with sufficient items, analyses supported unidimensionality. Combining items to form the adaptive and maladaptive subscales was partially supported.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The original five subscales required item deletion and/or rescaling to improve goodness of fit to the Rasch model. While evidence was found for overarching subscales of <it>adaptive</it> and <it>maladaptive</it> coping, extensive modifications were necessary to achieve this result. Further exploration and validation of over-arching subscales assessing <it>adaptive</it> and <it>maladaptive</it> coping is necessary with cancer survivors.</p> http://www.hqlo.com/content/10/1/55(3–10) CancerPsychometricsCopingAdjustmentSurvivorQuestionnairesRasch |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Zucca Alison Lambert Sylvie D Boyes Allison W Pallant Julie F |
spellingShingle |
Zucca Alison Lambert Sylvie D Boyes Allison W Pallant Julie F Rasch analysis of the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (mini-MAC) among a heterogeneous sample of long-term cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study Health and Quality of Life Outcomes (3–10) Cancer Psychometrics Coping Adjustment Survivor Questionnaires Rasch |
author_facet |
Zucca Alison Lambert Sylvie D Boyes Allison W Pallant Julie F |
author_sort |
Zucca Alison |
title |
Rasch analysis of the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (mini-MAC) among a heterogeneous sample of long-term cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study |
title_short |
Rasch analysis of the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (mini-MAC) among a heterogeneous sample of long-term cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study |
title_full |
Rasch analysis of the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (mini-MAC) among a heterogeneous sample of long-term cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr |
Rasch analysis of the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (mini-MAC) among a heterogeneous sample of long-term cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rasch analysis of the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (mini-MAC) among a heterogeneous sample of long-term cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study |
title_sort |
rasch analysis of the mini-mental adjustment to cancer scale (mini-mac) among a heterogeneous sample of long-term cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes |
issn |
1477-7525 |
publishDate |
2012-05-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (mini-MAC) is a well-recognised, popular measure of coping in psycho-oncology and assesses five cancer-specific coping strategies. It has been suggested that these five subscales could be grouped to form the over-arching <it>adaptive</it> and <it>maladptive</it> coping subscales to facilitate the interpretation and clinical application of the scale. Despite the popularity of the mini-MAC, few studies have examined its psychometric properties among long-term cancer survivors, and further validation of the mini-MAC is needed to substantiate its use with the growing population of survivors. Therefore, this study examined the psychometric properties and dimensionality of the mini-MAC in a sample of long-term cancer survivors using Rasch analysis.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>RUMM 2030 was used to analyse the mini-MAC data (n=851). Separate Rasch analyses were conducted for each of the original mini-MAC subscales as well as the over-arching adaptive and maladaptive coping subscales to examine summary and individual model fit statistics, person separation index (PSI), response format, local dependency, targeting, item bias (or differential item functioning -DIF), and dimensionality.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>For the fighting spirit, fatalism, and helplessness-hopelessness subscales, a revised three-point response format seemed more optimal than the original four-point response. To achieve model fit, items were deleted from four of the five subscales – Anxious Preoccupation items 7, 25, and 29; Cognitive Avoidance items 11 and 17; Fighting Spirit item 18; and Helplessness-Hopelessness items 16 and 20. For those subscales with sufficient items, analyses supported unidimensionality. Combining items to form the adaptive and maladaptive subscales was partially supported.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The original five subscales required item deletion and/or rescaling to improve goodness of fit to the Rasch model. While evidence was found for overarching subscales of <it>adaptive</it> and <it>maladaptive</it> coping, extensive modifications were necessary to achieve this result. Further exploration and validation of over-arching subscales assessing <it>adaptive</it> and <it>maladaptive</it> coping is necessary with cancer survivors.</p> |
topic |
(3–10) Cancer Psychometrics Coping Adjustment Survivor Questionnaires Rasch |
url |
http://www.hqlo.com/content/10/1/55 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zuccaalison raschanalysisoftheminimentaladjustmenttocancerscaleminimacamongaheterogeneoussampleoflongtermcancersurvivorsacrosssectionalstudy AT lambertsylvied raschanalysisoftheminimentaladjustmenttocancerscaleminimacamongaheterogeneoussampleoflongtermcancersurvivorsacrosssectionalstudy AT boyesallisonw raschanalysisoftheminimentaladjustmenttocancerscaleminimacamongaheterogeneoussampleoflongtermcancersurvivorsacrosssectionalstudy AT pallantjulief raschanalysisoftheminimentaladjustmenttocancerscaleminimacamongaheterogeneoussampleoflongtermcancersurvivorsacrosssectionalstudy |
_version_ |
1725366530689990656 |