A Comparison of Sparse Partial Least Squares and Elastic Net in Wavelength Selection on NIR Spectroscopy Data

Elastic net (Enet) and sparse partial least squares (SPLS) are frequently employed for wavelength selection and model calibration in analysis of near infrared spectroscopy data. Enet and SPLS can perform variable selection and model calibration simultaneously. And they also tend to select wavelength...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guang-Hui Fu, Min-Jie Zong, Feng-Hua Wang, Lun-Zhao Yi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:International Journal of Analytical Chemistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7314916
Description
Summary:Elastic net (Enet) and sparse partial least squares (SPLS) are frequently employed for wavelength selection and model calibration in analysis of near infrared spectroscopy data. Enet and SPLS can perform variable selection and model calibration simultaneously. And they also tend to select wavelength intervals rather than individual wavelengths when the predictors are multicollinear. In this paper, we focus on comparison of Enet and SPLS in interval wavelength selection and model calibration for near infrared spectroscopy data. The results from both simulation and real spectroscopy data show that Enet method tends to select less predictors as key variables than SPLS; thus it gets more parsimony model and brings advantages for model interpretation. SPLS can obtain much lower mean square of prediction error (MSE) than Enet. So SPLS is more suitable when the attention is to get better model fitting accuracy. The above conclusion is still held when coming to performing the strongly correlated NIR spectroscopy data whose predictors present group structures, Enet exhibits more sparse property than SPLS, and the selected predictors (wavelengths) are segmentally successive.
ISSN:1687-8760
1687-8779