The Risk of Postkidney Transplant Outcomes by Induction Choice Differs by Recipient Age

Background. Among adult kidney transplant (KT) recipients, the risk of post-KT adverse outcomes differs by type of induction immunosuppression. Immune response to induction differs as recipients age; yet, choice of induction is barely tailored by age likely due to a lack of evidence of the risks and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: JiYoon B. Ahn, KMD, MPH, Sunjae Bae, KMD, PhD, Nadia M. Chu, PhD, MPH, Lingyu Wang, MBBS, Jongyeon Kim, ScM, Mark Schnitzler, PhD, Gregory P. Hess, MD, MSc, Krista L. Lentine, MD, PhD, Dorry L. Segev, MD, PhD, Mara A. McAdams-DeMarco, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2021-07-01
Series:Transplantation Direct
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/transplantationdirect/fulltext/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001105
id doaj-ce71f1fe55b248bdaea208767ca63d8f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ce71f1fe55b248bdaea208767ca63d8f2021-08-25T06:54:36ZengWolters KluwerTransplantation Direct2373-87312021-07-0177e71510.1097/TXD.0000000000001105202107000-00010The Risk of Postkidney Transplant Outcomes by Induction Choice Differs by Recipient AgeJiYoon B. Ahn, KMD, MPH0Sunjae Bae, KMD, PhD1Nadia M. Chu, PhD, MPH2Lingyu Wang, MBBS3Jongyeon Kim, ScM4Mark Schnitzler, PhD5Gregory P. Hess, MD, MSc6Krista L. Lentine, MD, PhD7Dorry L. Segev, MD, PhD8Mara A. McAdams-DeMarco, PhD91 Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.1 Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.1 Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.2 Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.2 Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.3 Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.4 Department of Emergency Medicine, Drexel College of Medicine, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.3 Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.1 Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.1 Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.Background. Among adult kidney transplant (KT) recipients, the risk of post-KT adverse outcomes differs by type of induction immunosuppression. Immune response to induction differs as recipients age; yet, choice of induction is barely tailored by age likely due to a lack of evidence of the risks and benefits. Methods. Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we identified 39336 first-time KT recipients (2010–2016). We estimated the length of stay (LOS), acute rejection (AR), graft failure, and death by induction type using logistic and Cox regression weighted by propensity score to adjust for confounders. We tested whether these estimates differed by age (65+ versus 18–64 y) using a Wald test. Results. Overall, rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) was associated with a decreased risk of AR (odds ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.85) compared with basiliximab. The effect of induction on LOS and death (interaction P = 0.03 and 0.003) differed by recipient age. Discharge was on average 11% shorter in rATG among younger recipients (relative time = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.99) but not among older recipients (relative time = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.08). rATG was not associated with mortality among older (hazard ratio = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.96-1.15), but among younger recipients (hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.95), it was associated with reduced mortality risk. Conclusions. rATG should be considered to prevent AR, especially among recipients with high-immunologic risk regardless of age; however, choice of induction should be tailored to reduce LOS and risk of mortality, particularly among younger recipients.http://journals.lww.com/transplantationdirect/fulltext/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001105
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author JiYoon B. Ahn, KMD, MPH
Sunjae Bae, KMD, PhD
Nadia M. Chu, PhD, MPH
Lingyu Wang, MBBS
Jongyeon Kim, ScM
Mark Schnitzler, PhD
Gregory P. Hess, MD, MSc
Krista L. Lentine, MD, PhD
Dorry L. Segev, MD, PhD
Mara A. McAdams-DeMarco, PhD
spellingShingle JiYoon B. Ahn, KMD, MPH
Sunjae Bae, KMD, PhD
Nadia M. Chu, PhD, MPH
Lingyu Wang, MBBS
Jongyeon Kim, ScM
Mark Schnitzler, PhD
Gregory P. Hess, MD, MSc
Krista L. Lentine, MD, PhD
Dorry L. Segev, MD, PhD
Mara A. McAdams-DeMarco, PhD
The Risk of Postkidney Transplant Outcomes by Induction Choice Differs by Recipient Age
Transplantation Direct
author_facet JiYoon B. Ahn, KMD, MPH
Sunjae Bae, KMD, PhD
Nadia M. Chu, PhD, MPH
Lingyu Wang, MBBS
Jongyeon Kim, ScM
Mark Schnitzler, PhD
Gregory P. Hess, MD, MSc
Krista L. Lentine, MD, PhD
Dorry L. Segev, MD, PhD
Mara A. McAdams-DeMarco, PhD
author_sort JiYoon B. Ahn, KMD, MPH
title The Risk of Postkidney Transplant Outcomes by Induction Choice Differs by Recipient Age
title_short The Risk of Postkidney Transplant Outcomes by Induction Choice Differs by Recipient Age
title_full The Risk of Postkidney Transplant Outcomes by Induction Choice Differs by Recipient Age
title_fullStr The Risk of Postkidney Transplant Outcomes by Induction Choice Differs by Recipient Age
title_full_unstemmed The Risk of Postkidney Transplant Outcomes by Induction Choice Differs by Recipient Age
title_sort risk of postkidney transplant outcomes by induction choice differs by recipient age
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Transplantation Direct
issn 2373-8731
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Background. Among adult kidney transplant (KT) recipients, the risk of post-KT adverse outcomes differs by type of induction immunosuppression. Immune response to induction differs as recipients age; yet, choice of induction is barely tailored by age likely due to a lack of evidence of the risks and benefits. Methods. Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we identified 39336 first-time KT recipients (2010–2016). We estimated the length of stay (LOS), acute rejection (AR), graft failure, and death by induction type using logistic and Cox regression weighted by propensity score to adjust for confounders. We tested whether these estimates differed by age (65+ versus 18–64 y) using a Wald test. Results. Overall, rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) was associated with a decreased risk of AR (odds ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.85) compared with basiliximab. The effect of induction on LOS and death (interaction P = 0.03 and 0.003) differed by recipient age. Discharge was on average 11% shorter in rATG among younger recipients (relative time = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.99) but not among older recipients (relative time = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.08). rATG was not associated with mortality among older (hazard ratio = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.96-1.15), but among younger recipients (hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.95), it was associated with reduced mortality risk. Conclusions. rATG should be considered to prevent AR, especially among recipients with high-immunologic risk regardless of age; however, choice of induction should be tailored to reduce LOS and risk of mortality, particularly among younger recipients.
url http://journals.lww.com/transplantationdirect/fulltext/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001105
work_keys_str_mv AT jiyoonbahnkmdmph theriskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT sunjaebaekmdphd theriskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT nadiamchuphdmph theriskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT lingyuwangmbbs theriskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT jongyeonkimscm theriskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT markschnitzlerphd theriskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT gregoryphessmdmsc theriskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT kristallentinemdphd theriskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT dorrylsegevmdphd theriskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT maraamcadamsdemarcophd theriskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT jiyoonbahnkmdmph riskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT sunjaebaekmdphd riskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT nadiamchuphdmph riskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT lingyuwangmbbs riskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT jongyeonkimscm riskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT markschnitzlerphd riskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT gregoryphessmdmsc riskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT kristallentinemdphd riskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT dorrylsegevmdphd riskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
AT maraamcadamsdemarcophd riskofpostkidneytransplantoutcomesbyinductionchoicediffersbyrecipientage
_version_ 1721196775988002816