New designs for research in delay discounting
The two most influential models in delay discounting research have been the exponential (E) and hyperbolic (H) models. We develop a new methodology to design binary choice questions such that exponential and hyperbolic discount rates can be purposefully manipulated to make their rate parameters orth...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
2011-12-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/11/m37/m37.pdf |
id |
doaj-ce7e0b3216c14bdaa6f89644a4bfae73 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ce7e0b3216c14bdaa6f89644a4bfae732021-05-02T02:52:20ZengSociety for Judgment and Decision MakingJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752011-12-0168759770New designs for research in delay discountingJohn R. DoyleCatherine H. ChenKrishna SavaniThe two most influential models in delay discounting research have been the exponential (E) and hyperbolic (H) models. We develop a new methodology to design binary choice questions such that exponential and hyperbolic discount rates can be purposefully manipulated to make their rate parameters orthogonal (Pearson's R = 0), negatively correlated (R = --1), positively correlated (R = +1), or to hold one rate constant while allowing the other to vary. Then we extend the method to similarly contrast different versions of the hyperboloid model. The arithmetic discounting model (A), which is based on differences between present and future rewards rather than their ratios, may easily be made orthogonal to any other pair of models. Our procedure makes it possible to design choice stimuli that precisely vary the relationship between different discount rates. However, the additional control over the correlation between different discount rate parameters may require the researcher to either restrict the range that those rate parameters can take, or to expand the range of times the participant must wait for future rewards.http://journal.sjdm.org/11/m37/m37.pdfdelay discountingexponential discountinghyperbolicdiscountingarithmetic discountingmodel separationExcel Solver. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
John R. Doyle Catherine H. Chen Krishna Savani |
spellingShingle |
John R. Doyle Catherine H. Chen Krishna Savani New designs for research in delay discounting Judgment and Decision Making delay discounting exponential discounting hyperbolicdiscounting arithmetic discounting model separation Excel Solver. |
author_facet |
John R. Doyle Catherine H. Chen Krishna Savani |
author_sort |
John R. Doyle |
title |
New designs for research in delay discounting |
title_short |
New designs for research in delay discounting |
title_full |
New designs for research in delay discounting |
title_fullStr |
New designs for research in delay discounting |
title_full_unstemmed |
New designs for research in delay discounting |
title_sort |
new designs for research in delay discounting |
publisher |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making |
series |
Judgment and Decision Making |
issn |
1930-2975 |
publishDate |
2011-12-01 |
description |
The two most influential models in delay discounting research have been the exponential (E) and hyperbolic (H) models. We develop a new methodology to design binary choice questions such that exponential and hyperbolic discount rates can be purposefully manipulated to make their rate parameters orthogonal (Pearson's R = 0), negatively correlated (R = --1), positively correlated (R = +1), or to hold one rate constant while allowing the other to vary. Then we extend the method to similarly contrast different versions of the hyperboloid model. The arithmetic discounting model (A), which is based on differences between present and future rewards rather than their ratios, may easily be made orthogonal to any other pair of models. Our procedure makes it possible to design choice stimuli that precisely vary the relationship between different discount rates. However, the additional control over the correlation between different discount rate parameters may require the researcher to either restrict the range that those rate parameters can take, or to expand the range of times the participant must wait for future rewards. |
topic |
delay discounting exponential discounting hyperbolicdiscounting arithmetic discounting model separation Excel Solver. |
url |
http://journal.sjdm.org/11/m37/m37.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT johnrdoyle newdesignsforresearchindelaydiscounting AT catherinehchen newdesignsforresearchindelaydiscounting AT krishnasavani newdesignsforresearchindelaydiscounting |
_version_ |
1721495995413430272 |