LANGUAGE AND SPEECH IN THE SPACE OF CULTURE: INTERPRETATION AND REINTERPRETATION

The author focuses on the experience of the thought-speech activity of the subject. Its consideration is carried out through the prism of such areas of humanitarian science as the philosophy of language, ontology, psychology, cultural studies, and art history. The necessity for interdisciplinary app...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Polina S. Volkova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Volgograd State University 2017-12-01
Series:Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 2. Âzykoznanie
Subjects:
Online Access:https://l.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1693
id doaj-ceaad3e7f1ef4f6da8ffc3a857e73bfd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ceaad3e7f1ef4f6da8ffc3a857e73bfd2020-11-24T22:40:09ZengVolgograd State UniversityVestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 2. Âzykoznanie1998-99112409-19792017-12-0116420721410.15688/jvolsu2.2017.4.20LANGUAGE AND SPEECH IN THE SPACE OF CULTURE: INTERPRETATION AND REINTERPRETATIONPolina S. Volkova0Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. TrubilinaThe author focuses on the experience of the thought-speech activity of the subject. Its consideration is carried out through the prism of such areas of humanitarian science as the philosophy of language, ontology, psychology, cultural studies, and art history. The necessity for interdisciplinary approach is explained by the fact that the comprehension of the essence of thought-speech activity within any science impoverishes the notion of thinking culture and speech culture of a subject involved in interaction with himself and with other people. In this context, as the basic category, the author determines the individual conceptual system of the subject of speech, the dual character of which is recognized, on the one hand, at the level of an expedient, automatically triggered by the nature of the information process, realized through interpretation and representing the experience of self-organization of the system; on the other hand, level of an individual conceptual system organization as a purely human activity (thought activity), realized through reinterpretation. If in the first case nature pre-mines over man, as a result of which life is subordinated to the satisfaction of natural reflexes (instincts), in the second case there is a reflection providing the subject of thought-speech activity with freedom over natural instincts. It is asserted that in the second case, the consciousness acts as a true regulator of the life of a linguistic personality.https://l.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1693thinkingmeaningindividual consciousnesscollective unconscious
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Polina S. Volkova
spellingShingle Polina S. Volkova
LANGUAGE AND SPEECH IN THE SPACE OF CULTURE: INTERPRETATION AND REINTERPRETATION
Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 2. Âzykoznanie
thinking
meaning
individual consciousness
collective unconscious
author_facet Polina S. Volkova
author_sort Polina S. Volkova
title LANGUAGE AND SPEECH IN THE SPACE OF CULTURE: INTERPRETATION AND REINTERPRETATION
title_short LANGUAGE AND SPEECH IN THE SPACE OF CULTURE: INTERPRETATION AND REINTERPRETATION
title_full LANGUAGE AND SPEECH IN THE SPACE OF CULTURE: INTERPRETATION AND REINTERPRETATION
title_fullStr LANGUAGE AND SPEECH IN THE SPACE OF CULTURE: INTERPRETATION AND REINTERPRETATION
title_full_unstemmed LANGUAGE AND SPEECH IN THE SPACE OF CULTURE: INTERPRETATION AND REINTERPRETATION
title_sort language and speech in the space of culture: interpretation and reinterpretation
publisher Volgograd State University
series Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 2. Âzykoznanie
issn 1998-9911
2409-1979
publishDate 2017-12-01
description The author focuses on the experience of the thought-speech activity of the subject. Its consideration is carried out through the prism of such areas of humanitarian science as the philosophy of language, ontology, psychology, cultural studies, and art history. The necessity for interdisciplinary approach is explained by the fact that the comprehension of the essence of thought-speech activity within any science impoverishes the notion of thinking culture and speech culture of a subject involved in interaction with himself and with other people. In this context, as the basic category, the author determines the individual conceptual system of the subject of speech, the dual character of which is recognized, on the one hand, at the level of an expedient, automatically triggered by the nature of the information process, realized through interpretation and representing the experience of self-organization of the system; on the other hand, level of an individual conceptual system organization as a purely human activity (thought activity), realized through reinterpretation. If in the first case nature pre-mines over man, as a result of which life is subordinated to the satisfaction of natural reflexes (instincts), in the second case there is a reflection providing the subject of thought-speech activity with freedom over natural instincts. It is asserted that in the second case, the consciousness acts as a true regulator of the life of a linguistic personality.
topic thinking
meaning
individual consciousness
collective unconscious
url https://l.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1693
work_keys_str_mv AT polinasvolkova languageandspeechinthespaceofcultureinterpretationandreinterpretation
_version_ 1725705676809830400