Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case study
<p>The veracity of urban climate simulation models should be systematically evaluated to demonstrate the trustworthiness of these models against possible model uncertainties. However, existing studies paid insufficient attention to model evaluation; most studies only provided some simple compa...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Geoscientific Model Development |
Online Access: | https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/4571/2019/gmd-12-4571-2019.pdf |
id |
doaj-ceae329131c8408bae2bbb1cc1a1e0b2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ceae329131c8408bae2bbb1cc1a1e0b22020-11-25T02:15:38ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032019-11-01124571458410.5194/gmd-12-4571-2019Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case studyZ. Li0Z. Li1Y. Zhou2Y. Zhou3B. Wan4H. Chung5B. Huang6B. Huang7B. Liu8Institute of Space and Earth Information Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, ChinaShenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, 518057, ChinaShenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, 518057, ChinaDepartment of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, ChinaGlarun Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, 211100, ChinaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, ChinaInstitute of Space and Earth Information Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, ChinaShenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, 518057, ChinaResearch Institute of Tsinghua University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518057, China<p>The veracity of urban climate simulation models should be systematically evaluated to demonstrate the trustworthiness of these models against possible model uncertainties. However, existing studies paid insufficient attention to model evaluation; most studies only provided some simple comparison lines between modelled variables and their corresponding observed ones on the temporal dimension. Challenges remain since such simple comparisons cannot concretely prove that the simulation of urban climate behaviours is reliable. Studies without systematic model evaluations, being ambiguous or arbitrary to some extent, may lead to some seemingly new but scientifically misleading findings.</p> <p>To tackle these challenges, this article proposes a methodological framework for the model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations and demonstrates its effectiveness with a case study in the area of Shenzhen and Hong Kong SAR, China. It is intended to (again) remind urban climate modellers of the necessity of conducting systematic model evaluations with urban-scale climatology modelling and reduce these ambiguous or arbitrary modelling practices.</p>https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/4571/2019/gmd-12-4571-2019.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Z. Li Z. Li Y. Zhou Y. Zhou B. Wan H. Chung B. Huang B. Huang B. Liu |
spellingShingle |
Z. Li Z. Li Y. Zhou Y. Zhou B. Wan H. Chung B. Huang B. Huang B. Liu Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case study Geoscientific Model Development |
author_facet |
Z. Li Z. Li Y. Zhou Y. Zhou B. Wan H. Chung B. Huang B. Huang B. Liu |
author_sort |
Z. Li |
title |
Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case study |
title_short |
Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case study |
title_full |
Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case study |
title_fullStr |
Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case study |
title_sort |
model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the wrf/noah lsm/slucm model (version 3.7.1) as a case study |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Geoscientific Model Development |
issn |
1991-959X 1991-9603 |
publishDate |
2019-11-01 |
description |
<p>The veracity of urban climate simulation models should be
systematically evaluated to demonstrate the trustworthiness of these models
against possible model uncertainties. However, existing studies paid
insufficient attention to model evaluation; most studies only provided
some simple comparison lines between modelled variables and their
corresponding observed ones on the temporal dimension. Challenges remain
since such simple comparisons cannot concretely prove that the simulation of urban climate behaviours is reliable. Studies without systematic model
evaluations, being ambiguous or arbitrary to some extent, may lead to some
seemingly new but scientifically misleading findings.</p>
<p>To tackle these challenges, this article proposes a methodological framework for the model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations and demonstrates its effectiveness with a case study in the area of Shenzhen and Hong Kong SAR, China. It is intended to (again) remind urban climate modellers of the necessity of conducting systematic model evaluations with urban-scale climatology modelling and reduce these ambiguous or arbitrary modelling
practices.</p> |
url |
https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/4571/2019/gmd-12-4571-2019.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zli modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy AT zli modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy AT yzhou modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy AT yzhou modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy AT bwan modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy AT hchung modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy AT bhuang modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy AT bhuang modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy AT bliu modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy |
_version_ |
1724894900626915328 |