Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case study

<p>The veracity of urban climate simulation models should be systematically evaluated to demonstrate the trustworthiness of these models against possible model uncertainties. However, existing studies paid insufficient attention to model evaluation; most studies only provided some simple compa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Z. Li, Y. Zhou, B. Wan, H. Chung, B. Huang, B. Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-11-01
Series:Geoscientific Model Development
Online Access:https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/4571/2019/gmd-12-4571-2019.pdf
id doaj-ceae329131c8408bae2bbb1cc1a1e0b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ceae329131c8408bae2bbb1cc1a1e0b22020-11-25T02:15:38ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032019-11-01124571458410.5194/gmd-12-4571-2019Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case studyZ. Li0Z. Li1Y. Zhou2Y. Zhou3B. Wan4H. Chung5B. Huang6B. Huang7B. Liu8Institute of Space and Earth Information Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, ChinaShenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, 518057, ChinaShenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, 518057, ChinaDepartment of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, ChinaGlarun Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, 211100, ChinaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, ChinaInstitute of Space and Earth Information Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, ChinaShenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, 518057, ChinaResearch Institute of Tsinghua University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518057, China<p>The veracity of urban climate simulation models should be systematically evaluated to demonstrate the trustworthiness of these models against possible model uncertainties. However, existing studies paid insufficient attention to model evaluation; most studies only provided some simple comparison lines between modelled variables and their corresponding observed ones on the temporal dimension. Challenges remain since such simple comparisons cannot concretely prove that the simulation of urban climate behaviours is reliable. Studies without systematic model evaluations, being ambiguous or arbitrary to some extent, may lead to some seemingly new but scientifically misleading findings.</p> <p>To tackle these challenges, this article proposes a methodological framework for the model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations and demonstrates its effectiveness with a case study in the area of Shenzhen and Hong Kong SAR, China. It is intended to (again) remind urban climate modellers of the necessity of conducting systematic model evaluations with urban-scale climatology modelling and reduce these ambiguous or arbitrary modelling practices.</p>https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/4571/2019/gmd-12-4571-2019.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Z. Li
Z. Li
Y. Zhou
Y. Zhou
B. Wan
H. Chung
B. Huang
B. Huang
B. Liu
spellingShingle Z. Li
Z. Li
Y. Zhou
Y. Zhou
B. Wan
H. Chung
B. Huang
B. Huang
B. Liu
Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case study
Geoscientific Model Development
author_facet Z. Li
Z. Li
Y. Zhou
Y. Zhou
B. Wan
H. Chung
B. Huang
B. Huang
B. Liu
author_sort Z. Li
title Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case study
title_short Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case study
title_full Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case study
title_fullStr Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case study
title_full_unstemmed Model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the WRF/Noah LSM/SLUCM model (Version 3.7.1) as a case study
title_sort model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations: using the wrf/noah lsm/slucm model (version 3.7.1) as a case study
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Geoscientific Model Development
issn 1991-959X
1991-9603
publishDate 2019-11-01
description <p>The veracity of urban climate simulation models should be systematically evaluated to demonstrate the trustworthiness of these models against possible model uncertainties. However, existing studies paid insufficient attention to model evaluation; most studies only provided some simple comparison lines between modelled variables and their corresponding observed ones on the temporal dimension. Challenges remain since such simple comparisons cannot concretely prove that the simulation of urban climate behaviours is reliable. Studies without systematic model evaluations, being ambiguous or arbitrary to some extent, may lead to some seemingly new but scientifically misleading findings.</p> <p>To tackle these challenges, this article proposes a methodological framework for the model evaluation of high-resolution urban climate simulations and demonstrates its effectiveness with a case study in the area of Shenzhen and Hong Kong SAR, China. It is intended to (again) remind urban climate modellers of the necessity of conducting systematic model evaluations with urban-scale climatology modelling and reduce these ambiguous or arbitrary modelling practices.</p>
url https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/4571/2019/gmd-12-4571-2019.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zli modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy
AT zli modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy
AT yzhou modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy
AT yzhou modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy
AT bwan modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy
AT hchung modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy
AT bhuang modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy
AT bhuang modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy
AT bliu modelevaluationofhighresolutionurbanclimatesimulationsusingthewrfnoahlsmslucmmodelversion371asacasestudy
_version_ 1724894900626915328