Community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield.
Climate change affects agriculture through a range of direct and indirect pathways. These include direct changes to impacts of pests and diseases on crops and indirect effects produced by interactions between organisms. It remains unclear whether the net effects of these biotic influences will be be...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6242358?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-ceb19782d1bc4072b1c303c9ef2102cf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ceb19782d1bc4072b1c303c9ef2102cf2020-11-24T21:35:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-011311e020779610.1371/journal.pone.0207796Community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield.Mark A K GillespieMarco JacomettiJason M TylianakisSteve D WrattenClimate change affects agriculture through a range of direct and indirect pathways. These include direct changes to impacts of pests and diseases on crops and indirect effects produced by interactions between organisms. It remains unclear whether the net effects of these biotic influences will be beneficial or detrimental to crop yield because few studies consider multiple interactions within communities and the net effects of these on community structure and yield. In this study, we created two experimental grapevine communities in field cages, and quantified direct and indirect effects of key pest and disease species under simulated climate change conditions (elevated temperature and reduced humidity). We found that the net impact of simulated climate change on total yield differed for the two communities, with increased yield in one community and no effect in the other. These effects, and the interactions between pests and pathogens, may also have been affected by the prevailing abiotic conditions, and we discuss how these may contribute to our findings. These results demonstrate that future research should consider more of the interactions between key organisms affecting crops under varying abiotic conditions to help generate future recommendations for adapting to the effects of climate change.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6242358?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mark A K Gillespie Marco Jacometti Jason M Tylianakis Steve D Wratten |
spellingShingle |
Mark A K Gillespie Marco Jacometti Jason M Tylianakis Steve D Wratten Community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Mark A K Gillespie Marco Jacometti Jason M Tylianakis Steve D Wratten |
author_sort |
Mark A K Gillespie |
title |
Community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield. |
title_short |
Community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield. |
title_full |
Community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield. |
title_fullStr |
Community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield. |
title_sort |
community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Climate change affects agriculture through a range of direct and indirect pathways. These include direct changes to impacts of pests and diseases on crops and indirect effects produced by interactions between organisms. It remains unclear whether the net effects of these biotic influences will be beneficial or detrimental to crop yield because few studies consider multiple interactions within communities and the net effects of these on community structure and yield. In this study, we created two experimental grapevine communities in field cages, and quantified direct and indirect effects of key pest and disease species under simulated climate change conditions (elevated temperature and reduced humidity). We found that the net impact of simulated climate change on total yield differed for the two communities, with increased yield in one community and no effect in the other. These effects, and the interactions between pests and pathogens, may also have been affected by the prevailing abiotic conditions, and we discuss how these may contribute to our findings. These results demonstrate that future research should consider more of the interactions between key organisms affecting crops under varying abiotic conditions to help generate future recommendations for adapting to the effects of climate change. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6242358?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT markakgillespie communitydynamicscanmodifythedirectionofsimulatedwarmingeffectsoncropyield AT marcojacometti communitydynamicscanmodifythedirectionofsimulatedwarmingeffectsoncropyield AT jasonmtylianakis communitydynamicscanmodifythedirectionofsimulatedwarmingeffectsoncropyield AT stevedwratten communitydynamicscanmodifythedirectionofsimulatedwarmingeffectsoncropyield |
_version_ |
1725943835314356224 |