Community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield.

Climate change affects agriculture through a range of direct and indirect pathways. These include direct changes to impacts of pests and diseases on crops and indirect effects produced by interactions between organisms. It remains unclear whether the net effects of these biotic influences will be be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark A K Gillespie, Marco Jacometti, Jason M Tylianakis, Steve D Wratten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6242358?pdf=render
id doaj-ceb19782d1bc4072b1c303c9ef2102cf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ceb19782d1bc4072b1c303c9ef2102cf2020-11-24T21:35:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-011311e020779610.1371/journal.pone.0207796Community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield.Mark A K GillespieMarco JacomettiJason M TylianakisSteve D WrattenClimate change affects agriculture through a range of direct and indirect pathways. These include direct changes to impacts of pests and diseases on crops and indirect effects produced by interactions between organisms. It remains unclear whether the net effects of these biotic influences will be beneficial or detrimental to crop yield because few studies consider multiple interactions within communities and the net effects of these on community structure and yield. In this study, we created two experimental grapevine communities in field cages, and quantified direct and indirect effects of key pest and disease species under simulated climate change conditions (elevated temperature and reduced humidity). We found that the net impact of simulated climate change on total yield differed for the two communities, with increased yield in one community and no effect in the other. These effects, and the interactions between pests and pathogens, may also have been affected by the prevailing abiotic conditions, and we discuss how these may contribute to our findings. These results demonstrate that future research should consider more of the interactions between key organisms affecting crops under varying abiotic conditions to help generate future recommendations for adapting to the effects of climate change.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6242358?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark A K Gillespie
Marco Jacometti
Jason M Tylianakis
Steve D Wratten
spellingShingle Mark A K Gillespie
Marco Jacometti
Jason M Tylianakis
Steve D Wratten
Community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Mark A K Gillespie
Marco Jacometti
Jason M Tylianakis
Steve D Wratten
author_sort Mark A K Gillespie
title Community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield.
title_short Community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield.
title_full Community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield.
title_fullStr Community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield.
title_full_unstemmed Community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield.
title_sort community dynamics can modify the direction of simulated warming effects on crop yield.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Climate change affects agriculture through a range of direct and indirect pathways. These include direct changes to impacts of pests and diseases on crops and indirect effects produced by interactions between organisms. It remains unclear whether the net effects of these biotic influences will be beneficial or detrimental to crop yield because few studies consider multiple interactions within communities and the net effects of these on community structure and yield. In this study, we created two experimental grapevine communities in field cages, and quantified direct and indirect effects of key pest and disease species under simulated climate change conditions (elevated temperature and reduced humidity). We found that the net impact of simulated climate change on total yield differed for the two communities, with increased yield in one community and no effect in the other. These effects, and the interactions between pests and pathogens, may also have been affected by the prevailing abiotic conditions, and we discuss how these may contribute to our findings. These results demonstrate that future research should consider more of the interactions between key organisms affecting crops under varying abiotic conditions to help generate future recommendations for adapting to the effects of climate change.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6242358?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT markakgillespie communitydynamicscanmodifythedirectionofsimulatedwarmingeffectsoncropyield
AT marcojacometti communitydynamicscanmodifythedirectionofsimulatedwarmingeffectsoncropyield
AT jasonmtylianakis communitydynamicscanmodifythedirectionofsimulatedwarmingeffectsoncropyield
AT stevedwratten communitydynamicscanmodifythedirectionofsimulatedwarmingeffectsoncropyield
_version_ 1725943835314356224