Causative relations between human papilloma virus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between human papilloma virus (HPV) infections and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). The study included 421 women (aged 18–45 years) who were examined gynecologicaly; their medical history and Pap smear results were collected and colposcopy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefan Miladinov Kovachev, Victor Dimitrov Slavov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-05-01
Series:Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment
Subjects:
hpv
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2016.1159922
id doaj-cef5507213d14b4cb2ce723629e8b174
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cef5507213d14b4cb2ce723629e8b1742020-11-25T01:31:55ZengTaylor & Francis GroupBiotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment1310-28181314-35302016-05-0130355856110.1080/13102818.2016.11599221159922Causative relations between human papilloma virus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasiaStefan Miladinov Kovachev0Victor Dimitrov Slavov1Military Medical AcademyGenetic Medico-Diagnostic Laboratory “Genica” LTDThe aim of this study was to assess the correlation between human papilloma virus (HPV) infections and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). The study included 421 women (aged 18–45 years) who were examined gynecologicaly; their medical history and Pap smear results were collected and colposcopy and HPV tests were performed. In those cases where colposcopy and cytological evidence of atypism was found, biopsy or abrasion from the uterine cervix was performed. The GenoFlow HPV Array Test Kit was used to analyse the HPV status in cervical samples collected during the study. The obtained results showed that, one/more HPV genotypes were identified in 42% (177/421) and HPV(−) in 58% (244/421) of the examined women. In the HPV(+) group, CIN was diagnosed in 57 (13.5%) women, whereas, in the HPV(−) group, in 44 (10.5%) women. There was a significant dependence between HPV(+) status and development of CIN (p = 0.001), but the statistical analysis did not reveal sufficient positive predictive value or precision (p > 0.05), i.e. probability that (randomly selected) HPV(+) patients have CIN; neither sensitivity (p > 0.05), i.e. probability that (randomly selected) CIN patients are HPV(+); nor specificity (p > 0.05), i.e. probability that (randomly selected) women without CIN are HPV(−). These results indicate that infection with HPV is probably not the only cause for development of CIN.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2016.1159922hpvinfectioncervical intraepithelial neoplasia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stefan Miladinov Kovachev
Victor Dimitrov Slavov
spellingShingle Stefan Miladinov Kovachev
Victor Dimitrov Slavov
Causative relations between human papilloma virus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment
hpv
infection
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
author_facet Stefan Miladinov Kovachev
Victor Dimitrov Slavov
author_sort Stefan Miladinov Kovachev
title Causative relations between human papilloma virus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
title_short Causative relations between human papilloma virus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
title_full Causative relations between human papilloma virus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
title_fullStr Causative relations between human papilloma virus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
title_full_unstemmed Causative relations between human papilloma virus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
title_sort causative relations between human papilloma virus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment
issn 1310-2818
1314-3530
publishDate 2016-05-01
description The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between human papilloma virus (HPV) infections and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). The study included 421 women (aged 18–45 years) who were examined gynecologicaly; their medical history and Pap smear results were collected and colposcopy and HPV tests were performed. In those cases where colposcopy and cytological evidence of atypism was found, biopsy or abrasion from the uterine cervix was performed. The GenoFlow HPV Array Test Kit was used to analyse the HPV status in cervical samples collected during the study. The obtained results showed that, one/more HPV genotypes were identified in 42% (177/421) and HPV(−) in 58% (244/421) of the examined women. In the HPV(+) group, CIN was diagnosed in 57 (13.5%) women, whereas, in the HPV(−) group, in 44 (10.5%) women. There was a significant dependence between HPV(+) status and development of CIN (p = 0.001), but the statistical analysis did not reveal sufficient positive predictive value or precision (p > 0.05), i.e. probability that (randomly selected) HPV(+) patients have CIN; neither sensitivity (p > 0.05), i.e. probability that (randomly selected) CIN patients are HPV(+); nor specificity (p > 0.05), i.e. probability that (randomly selected) women without CIN are HPV(−). These results indicate that infection with HPV is probably not the only cause for development of CIN.
topic hpv
infection
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2016.1159922
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanmiladinovkovachev causativerelationsbetweenhumanpapillomavirusinfectionandcervicalintraepithelialneoplasia
AT victordimitrovslavov causativerelationsbetweenhumanpapillomavirusinfectionandcervicalintraepithelialneoplasia
_version_ 1725084524755288064