Perspectives on pharmacy access to hormonal contraception among rural New Mexico women

Objective: In 2017, New Mexico approved an amendment allowing pharmacists to prescribe and dispense hormonal contraception. We interviewed rural New Mexico women to determine their perceptions of pharmacy access to hormonal contraception. Study design: We conducted semi-structured telephone intervie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lauren Thaxton, Elizabeth Clark, Jocelyn Aubrey Wu, Alexandra Herman, Andrew L. Sussman, Eve Espey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:Contraception: X
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151621000162
id doaj-cf30879cd37b4efeb19e62927ee84f9d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cf30879cd37b4efeb19e62927ee84f9d2021-08-16T04:17:27ZengElsevierContraception: X2590-15162021-01-013100069Perspectives on pharmacy access to hormonal contraception among rural New Mexico womenLauren Thaxton0Elizabeth Clark1Jocelyn Aubrey Wu2Alexandra Herman3Andrew L. Sussman4Eve Espey5Department of Women's Health, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, United States; Corresponding author. L. Thaxton.Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United StatesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, United StatesDepartment of Pharmacy Practice & Administrative Sciences, University of New Mexico College of Pharmacy, Albuquerque, NM, United StatesDepartment of Family and Community Medicine and University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, United StatesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, United StatesObjective: In 2017, New Mexico approved an amendment allowing pharmacists to prescribe and dispense hormonal contraception. We interviewed rural New Mexico women to determine their perceptions of pharmacy access to hormonal contraception. Study design: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with women recruited from rural New Mexico communities. The interview guide explained the amendment followed by questions about the advantages and disadvantages of pharmacy access to hormonal contraception within rural communities. Results: Between November 2017 and May 2018, we recruited 32 women to participate. Participants were young (26/32 18–29 years old), gravid (27/31), employed (30/32), white (22/32) and Hispanic (26/31). The majority used Medicaid as their primary insurance (16/28). Most participants were supportive of pharmacy access to hormonal contraception. Participants saw their rural communities as facing health care barriers, some of which could be alleviated by pharmacy access. Perceived benefits of pharmacy access included convenience of pharmacy hours, shorter wait times, and no need for an appointment. Participants expressed concerns about lack of privacy in their pharmacies. Many expressed trust in their pharmacist to review side effects and explain usage of contraception- a role that was considered separate from that of a primary care provider who offers regular medical visits for routine screening and nuanced or complex discussions about contraception. Some participants expressed that pharmacy access could be especially beneficial for teens. Conclusions: Rural New Mexico women were supportive of pharmacy access to contraception and accept pharmacists as trusted members of the health care team. Implications: Rural New Mexico women find benefit in pharmacy access to hormonal contraception, citing improved access to contraceptives in their communities.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151621000162ContraceptionHormonal contraceptionPharmacy accessPharmacistRural health
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lauren Thaxton
Elizabeth Clark
Jocelyn Aubrey Wu
Alexandra Herman
Andrew L. Sussman
Eve Espey
spellingShingle Lauren Thaxton
Elizabeth Clark
Jocelyn Aubrey Wu
Alexandra Herman
Andrew L. Sussman
Eve Espey
Perspectives on pharmacy access to hormonal contraception among rural New Mexico women
Contraception: X
Contraception
Hormonal contraception
Pharmacy access
Pharmacist
Rural health
author_facet Lauren Thaxton
Elizabeth Clark
Jocelyn Aubrey Wu
Alexandra Herman
Andrew L. Sussman
Eve Espey
author_sort Lauren Thaxton
title Perspectives on pharmacy access to hormonal contraception among rural New Mexico women
title_short Perspectives on pharmacy access to hormonal contraception among rural New Mexico women
title_full Perspectives on pharmacy access to hormonal contraception among rural New Mexico women
title_fullStr Perspectives on pharmacy access to hormonal contraception among rural New Mexico women
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives on pharmacy access to hormonal contraception among rural New Mexico women
title_sort perspectives on pharmacy access to hormonal contraception among rural new mexico women
publisher Elsevier
series Contraception: X
issn 2590-1516
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Objective: In 2017, New Mexico approved an amendment allowing pharmacists to prescribe and dispense hormonal contraception. We interviewed rural New Mexico women to determine their perceptions of pharmacy access to hormonal contraception. Study design: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with women recruited from rural New Mexico communities. The interview guide explained the amendment followed by questions about the advantages and disadvantages of pharmacy access to hormonal contraception within rural communities. Results: Between November 2017 and May 2018, we recruited 32 women to participate. Participants were young (26/32 18–29 years old), gravid (27/31), employed (30/32), white (22/32) and Hispanic (26/31). The majority used Medicaid as their primary insurance (16/28). Most participants were supportive of pharmacy access to hormonal contraception. Participants saw their rural communities as facing health care barriers, some of which could be alleviated by pharmacy access. Perceived benefits of pharmacy access included convenience of pharmacy hours, shorter wait times, and no need for an appointment. Participants expressed concerns about lack of privacy in their pharmacies. Many expressed trust in their pharmacist to review side effects and explain usage of contraception- a role that was considered separate from that of a primary care provider who offers regular medical visits for routine screening and nuanced or complex discussions about contraception. Some participants expressed that pharmacy access could be especially beneficial for teens. Conclusions: Rural New Mexico women were supportive of pharmacy access to contraception and accept pharmacists as trusted members of the health care team. Implications: Rural New Mexico women find benefit in pharmacy access to hormonal contraception, citing improved access to contraceptives in their communities.
topic Contraception
Hormonal contraception
Pharmacy access
Pharmacist
Rural health
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151621000162
work_keys_str_mv AT laurenthaxton perspectivesonpharmacyaccesstohormonalcontraceptionamongruralnewmexicowomen
AT elizabethclark perspectivesonpharmacyaccesstohormonalcontraceptionamongruralnewmexicowomen
AT jocelynaubreywu perspectivesonpharmacyaccesstohormonalcontraceptionamongruralnewmexicowomen
AT alexandraherman perspectivesonpharmacyaccesstohormonalcontraceptionamongruralnewmexicowomen
AT andrewlsussman perspectivesonpharmacyaccesstohormonalcontraceptionamongruralnewmexicowomen
AT eveespey perspectivesonpharmacyaccesstohormonalcontraceptionamongruralnewmexicowomen
_version_ 1721206136231690240