Computation in Psychotherapy, or How Computational Psychiatry Can Aid Learning-Based Psychological Therapies
Learning-based therapies, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, are used worldwide, and their efficacy is endorsed by health and research funding agencies. However, the mechanisms behind both their strengths and their weaknesses are inadequately understood. Here we describe how advances in computati...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The MIT Press
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Computational Psychiatry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/CPSY_a_00014 |
id |
doaj-cf5625cac8b64fd89818ddcfa418a77f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cf5625cac8b64fd89818ddcfa418a77f2020-11-24T21:35:17ZengThe MIT PressComputational Psychiatry2379-62272018-02-012507310.1162/CPSY_a_00014CPSY_a_00014Computation in Psychotherapy, or How Computational Psychiatry Can Aid Learning-Based Psychological TherapiesMichael Moutoussis0Nitzan Shahar1Tobias U. Hauser2Raymond J. Dolan3Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UKWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UKWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UKWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UKLearning-based therapies, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, are used worldwide, and their efficacy is endorsed by health and research funding agencies. However, the mechanisms behind both their strengths and their weaknesses are inadequately understood. Here we describe how advances in computational modeling may help formalize and test hypotheses regarding how patients make inferences, which are core postulates of these therapies. Specifically, we highlight the relevance of computations with regard to the development, maintenance, and therapeutic change in psychiatric disorders. A Bayesian approach helps delineate which apparent inferential biases and aberrant beliefs are in fact near-normative, given patients’ current concerns, and which are not. As examples, we formalize three hypotheses. First, high-level dysfunctional beliefs should be treated as beliefs over models of the world. There is a need to test how, and whether, people apply these high-level beliefs to guide the formation of lower level beliefs important for real-life decision making, conditional on their experiences. Second, during the genesis of a disorder, maladaptive beliefs grow because more benign alternative schemas are discounted during belief updating. Third, we propose that when patients learn within therapy but fail to benefit in real life, this can be accounted for by a mechanism that we term overaccommodation, similar to that used to explain fear reinstatement. Beyond these specifics, an ambitious collaborative research program between computational psychiatry researchers, therapists, and experts-by-experience needs to form testable predictions out of factors claimed to be important for therapy.https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/CPSY_a_00014computational psychiatrybelief updatingBayesian inferencecognitive-behavioral therapymentalization-based therapynear-miss disasteravoidancetherapy failurereinforcement learningexposure-with-response-prevention |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michael Moutoussis Nitzan Shahar Tobias U. Hauser Raymond J. Dolan |
spellingShingle |
Michael Moutoussis Nitzan Shahar Tobias U. Hauser Raymond J. Dolan Computation in Psychotherapy, or How Computational Psychiatry Can Aid Learning-Based Psychological Therapies Computational Psychiatry computational psychiatry belief updating Bayesian inference cognitive-behavioral therapy mentalization-based therapy near-miss disaster avoidance therapy failure reinforcement learning exposure-with-response-prevention |
author_facet |
Michael Moutoussis Nitzan Shahar Tobias U. Hauser Raymond J. Dolan |
author_sort |
Michael Moutoussis |
title |
Computation in Psychotherapy, or How Computational Psychiatry Can Aid Learning-Based Psychological Therapies |
title_short |
Computation in Psychotherapy, or How Computational Psychiatry Can Aid Learning-Based Psychological Therapies |
title_full |
Computation in Psychotherapy, or How Computational Psychiatry Can Aid Learning-Based Psychological Therapies |
title_fullStr |
Computation in Psychotherapy, or How Computational Psychiatry Can Aid Learning-Based Psychological Therapies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Computation in Psychotherapy, or How Computational Psychiatry Can Aid Learning-Based Psychological Therapies |
title_sort |
computation in psychotherapy, or how computational psychiatry can aid learning-based psychological therapies |
publisher |
The MIT Press |
series |
Computational Psychiatry |
issn |
2379-6227 |
publishDate |
2018-02-01 |
description |
Learning-based therapies, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, are used worldwide, and their efficacy is endorsed by health and research funding agencies. However, the mechanisms behind both their strengths and their weaknesses are inadequately understood. Here we describe how advances in computational modeling may help formalize and test hypotheses regarding how patients make inferences, which are core postulates of these therapies. Specifically, we highlight the relevance of computations with regard to the development, maintenance, and therapeutic change in psychiatric disorders. A Bayesian approach helps delineate which apparent inferential biases and aberrant beliefs are in fact near-normative, given patients’ current concerns, and which are not. As examples, we formalize three hypotheses. First, high-level dysfunctional beliefs should be treated as beliefs over models of the world. There is a need to test how, and whether, people apply these high-level
beliefs to guide the formation of lower level beliefs important for real-life decision making, conditional on their experiences. Second, during the genesis of a disorder, maladaptive beliefs grow because more benign alternative schemas are discounted during belief updating. Third, we propose that when patients learn within therapy but fail to benefit in real life, this can be accounted for by a mechanism that we term overaccommodation, similar to that used to explain fear reinstatement. Beyond these specifics, an ambitious collaborative research program between computational psychiatry researchers, therapists, and experts-by-experience needs to form testable predictions out of factors claimed to be important for therapy. |
topic |
computational psychiatry belief updating Bayesian inference cognitive-behavioral therapy mentalization-based therapy near-miss disaster avoidance therapy failure reinforcement learning exposure-with-response-prevention |
url |
https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/CPSY_a_00014 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michaelmoutoussis computationinpsychotherapyorhowcomputationalpsychiatrycanaidlearningbasedpsychologicaltherapies AT nitzanshahar computationinpsychotherapyorhowcomputationalpsychiatrycanaidlearningbasedpsychologicaltherapies AT tobiasuhauser computationinpsychotherapyorhowcomputationalpsychiatrycanaidlearningbasedpsychologicaltherapies AT raymondjdolan computationinpsychotherapyorhowcomputationalpsychiatrycanaidlearningbasedpsychologicaltherapies |
_version_ |
1725945613532528640 |