Computation in Psychotherapy, or How Computational Psychiatry Can Aid Learning-Based Psychological Therapies

Learning-based therapies, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, are used worldwide, and their efficacy is endorsed by health and research funding agencies. However, the mechanisms behind both their strengths and their weaknesses are inadequately understood. Here we describe how advances in computati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Moutoussis, Nitzan Shahar, Tobias U. Hauser, Raymond J. Dolan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The MIT Press 2018-02-01
Series:Computational Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/CPSY_a_00014
id doaj-cf5625cac8b64fd89818ddcfa418a77f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cf5625cac8b64fd89818ddcfa418a77f2020-11-24T21:35:17ZengThe MIT PressComputational Psychiatry2379-62272018-02-012507310.1162/CPSY_a_00014CPSY_a_00014Computation in Psychotherapy, or How Computational Psychiatry Can Aid Learning-Based Psychological TherapiesMichael Moutoussis0Nitzan Shahar1Tobias U. Hauser2Raymond J. Dolan3Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UKWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UKWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UKWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UKLearning-based therapies, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, are used worldwide, and their efficacy is endorsed by health and research funding agencies. However, the mechanisms behind both their strengths and their weaknesses are inadequately understood. Here we describe how advances in computational modeling may help formalize and test hypotheses regarding how patients make inferences, which are core postulates of these therapies. Specifically, we highlight the relevance of computations with regard to the development, maintenance, and therapeutic change in psychiatric disorders. A Bayesian approach helps delineate which apparent inferential biases and aberrant beliefs are in fact near-normative, given patients’ current concerns, and which are not. As examples, we formalize three hypotheses. First, high-level dysfunctional beliefs should be treated as beliefs over models of the world. There is a need to test how, and whether, people apply these high-level beliefs to guide the formation of lower level beliefs important for real-life decision making, conditional on their experiences. Second, during the genesis of a disorder, maladaptive beliefs grow because more benign alternative schemas are discounted during belief updating. Third, we propose that when patients learn within therapy but fail to benefit in real life, this can be accounted for by a mechanism that we term overaccommodation, similar to that used to explain fear reinstatement. Beyond these specifics, an ambitious collaborative research program between computational psychiatry researchers, therapists, and experts-by-experience needs to form testable predictions out of factors claimed to be important for therapy.https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/CPSY_a_00014computational psychiatrybelief updatingBayesian inferencecognitive-behavioral therapymentalization-based therapynear-miss disasteravoidancetherapy failurereinforcement learningexposure-with-response-prevention
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Moutoussis
Nitzan Shahar
Tobias U. Hauser
Raymond J. Dolan
spellingShingle Michael Moutoussis
Nitzan Shahar
Tobias U. Hauser
Raymond J. Dolan
Computation in Psychotherapy, or How Computational Psychiatry Can Aid Learning-Based Psychological Therapies
Computational Psychiatry
computational psychiatry
belief updating
Bayesian inference
cognitive-behavioral therapy
mentalization-based therapy
near-miss disaster
avoidance
therapy failure
reinforcement learning
exposure-with-response-prevention
author_facet Michael Moutoussis
Nitzan Shahar
Tobias U. Hauser
Raymond J. Dolan
author_sort Michael Moutoussis
title Computation in Psychotherapy, or How Computational Psychiatry Can Aid Learning-Based Psychological Therapies
title_short Computation in Psychotherapy, or How Computational Psychiatry Can Aid Learning-Based Psychological Therapies
title_full Computation in Psychotherapy, or How Computational Psychiatry Can Aid Learning-Based Psychological Therapies
title_fullStr Computation in Psychotherapy, or How Computational Psychiatry Can Aid Learning-Based Psychological Therapies
title_full_unstemmed Computation in Psychotherapy, or How Computational Psychiatry Can Aid Learning-Based Psychological Therapies
title_sort computation in psychotherapy, or how computational psychiatry can aid learning-based psychological therapies
publisher The MIT Press
series Computational Psychiatry
issn 2379-6227
publishDate 2018-02-01
description Learning-based therapies, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, are used worldwide, and their efficacy is endorsed by health and research funding agencies. However, the mechanisms behind both their strengths and their weaknesses are inadequately understood. Here we describe how advances in computational modeling may help formalize and test hypotheses regarding how patients make inferences, which are core postulates of these therapies. Specifically, we highlight the relevance of computations with regard to the development, maintenance, and therapeutic change in psychiatric disorders. A Bayesian approach helps delineate which apparent inferential biases and aberrant beliefs are in fact near-normative, given patients’ current concerns, and which are not. As examples, we formalize three hypotheses. First, high-level dysfunctional beliefs should be treated as beliefs over models of the world. There is a need to test how, and whether, people apply these high-level beliefs to guide the formation of lower level beliefs important for real-life decision making, conditional on their experiences. Second, during the genesis of a disorder, maladaptive beliefs grow because more benign alternative schemas are discounted during belief updating. Third, we propose that when patients learn within therapy but fail to benefit in real life, this can be accounted for by a mechanism that we term overaccommodation, similar to that used to explain fear reinstatement. Beyond these specifics, an ambitious collaborative research program between computational psychiatry researchers, therapists, and experts-by-experience needs to form testable predictions out of factors claimed to be important for therapy.
topic computational psychiatry
belief updating
Bayesian inference
cognitive-behavioral therapy
mentalization-based therapy
near-miss disaster
avoidance
therapy failure
reinforcement learning
exposure-with-response-prevention
url https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/CPSY_a_00014
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelmoutoussis computationinpsychotherapyorhowcomputationalpsychiatrycanaidlearningbasedpsychologicaltherapies
AT nitzanshahar computationinpsychotherapyorhowcomputationalpsychiatrycanaidlearningbasedpsychologicaltherapies
AT tobiasuhauser computationinpsychotherapyorhowcomputationalpsychiatrycanaidlearningbasedpsychologicaltherapies
AT raymondjdolan computationinpsychotherapyorhowcomputationalpsychiatrycanaidlearningbasedpsychologicaltherapies
_version_ 1725945613532528640