Management of refractory lupus nephritis: challenges and opportunities

The development of refractory lupus nephritis (LN) indicates an inadequate response to the therapy, which implies the preservation or worsening of the disease activity, despite the the­rapy. However, the definition of LN is ambiguous, given the lack of clear response parameters: the study of protein...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I.Yu. Golovach, Ye.D. Yehudina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Publishing House Zaslavsky 2020-02-01
Series:Počki
Subjects:
Online Access:http://kidneys.zaslavsky.com.ua/article/view/196917
id doaj-cf6e685430d84d2792b8b3d6e51f6538
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cf6e685430d84d2792b8b3d6e51f65382020-11-25T03:02:17ZengPublishing House ZaslavskyPočki 2307-12572307-12652020-02-0191475710.22141/2307-1257.9.1.2020.196917196917Management of refractory lupus nephritis: challenges and opportunitiesI.Yu. Golovach0Ye.D. Yehudina1Clinical Hospital “Feofaniya” of the Agency of State Affairs, Kyiv, UkraineClinic of Modern Rheumatology, Kyiv, UkraineThe development of refractory lupus nephritis (LN) indicates an inadequate response to the therapy, which implies the preservation or worsening of the disease activity, despite the the­rapy. However, the definition of LN is ambiguous, given the lack of clear response parameters: the study of proteinuria and renal function does not give a clear difference between activity and irrever­sible damage. Understanding the causes of refractory disease and developing treatment strategies are very important since in such patients the prognosis is extremely unfavourable in the form of the development of the end-stage renal disease. This review explores the current concept of refractory LN and summarizes the treatment approaches used in observational cohort studies and case series. We emphasize the importance of optimizing patient adherence to immunosuppressive and supportive therapeutic strategies, as well as avoiding diagnosis delay. Treatment options include a higher dose of glucocorticoid, switching between cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil, or adding rituximab, which could potentially be combined with belimumab. Less evidence confirms the effectiveness of extracorporeal treatment (plasma exchange or immunoadsorption), calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporin A or tacrolimus), intravenous immunoglobulin and stem cell transplantation in the treatment of LN. Improvements in understanding what refractory LN is can be integrated into treatment pathways and improve outcomes of LNhttp://kidneys.zaslavsky.com.ua/article/view/196917lupus nephritisrefractoryrituximabimmunoadsorptionstem cell transplantationtreatment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author I.Yu. Golovach
Ye.D. Yehudina
spellingShingle I.Yu. Golovach
Ye.D. Yehudina
Management of refractory lupus nephritis: challenges and opportunities
Počki
lupus nephritis
refractory
rituximab
immunoadsorption
stem cell transplantation
treatment
author_facet I.Yu. Golovach
Ye.D. Yehudina
author_sort I.Yu. Golovach
title Management of refractory lupus nephritis: challenges and opportunities
title_short Management of refractory lupus nephritis: challenges and opportunities
title_full Management of refractory lupus nephritis: challenges and opportunities
title_fullStr Management of refractory lupus nephritis: challenges and opportunities
title_full_unstemmed Management of refractory lupus nephritis: challenges and opportunities
title_sort management of refractory lupus nephritis: challenges and opportunities
publisher Publishing House Zaslavsky
series Počki
issn 2307-1257
2307-1265
publishDate 2020-02-01
description The development of refractory lupus nephritis (LN) indicates an inadequate response to the therapy, which implies the preservation or worsening of the disease activity, despite the the­rapy. However, the definition of LN is ambiguous, given the lack of clear response parameters: the study of proteinuria and renal function does not give a clear difference between activity and irrever­sible damage. Understanding the causes of refractory disease and developing treatment strategies are very important since in such patients the prognosis is extremely unfavourable in the form of the development of the end-stage renal disease. This review explores the current concept of refractory LN and summarizes the treatment approaches used in observational cohort studies and case series. We emphasize the importance of optimizing patient adherence to immunosuppressive and supportive therapeutic strategies, as well as avoiding diagnosis delay. Treatment options include a higher dose of glucocorticoid, switching between cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil, or adding rituximab, which could potentially be combined with belimumab. Less evidence confirms the effectiveness of extracorporeal treatment (plasma exchange or immunoadsorption), calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporin A or tacrolimus), intravenous immunoglobulin and stem cell transplantation in the treatment of LN. Improvements in understanding what refractory LN is can be integrated into treatment pathways and improve outcomes of LN
topic lupus nephritis
refractory
rituximab
immunoadsorption
stem cell transplantation
treatment
url http://kidneys.zaslavsky.com.ua/article/view/196917
work_keys_str_mv AT iyugolovach managementofrefractorylupusnephritischallengesandopportunities
AT yedyehudina managementofrefractorylupusnephritischallengesandopportunities
_version_ 1724690389062909952