Biological Age Predictors

The search for reliable indicators of biological age, rather than chronological age, has been ongoing for over three decades, and until recently, largely without success. Advances in the fields of molecular biology have increased the variety of potential candidate biomarkers that may be considered a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juulia Jylhävä, Nancy L. Pedersen, Sara Hägg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-07-01
Series:EBioMedicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352396417301421
id doaj-cfd5b175614f4dadaaeb14470cd719da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cfd5b175614f4dadaaeb14470cd719da2020-11-25T00:07:11ZengElsevierEBioMedicine2352-39642017-07-0121C293610.1016/j.ebiom.2017.03.046Biological Age PredictorsJuulia JylhäväNancy L. PedersenSara HäggThe search for reliable indicators of biological age, rather than chronological age, has been ongoing for over three decades, and until recently, largely without success. Advances in the fields of molecular biology have increased the variety of potential candidate biomarkers that may be considered as biological age predictors. In this review, we summarize current state-of-the-art findings considering six potential types of biological age predictors: epigenetic clocks, telomere length, transcriptomic predictors, proteomic predictors, metabolomics-based predictors, and composite biomarker predictors. Promising developments consider multiple combinations of these various types of predictors, which may shed light on the aging process and provide further understanding of what contributes to healthy aging. Thus far, the most promising, new biological age predictor is the epigenetic clock; however its true value as a biomarker of aging requires longitudinal confirmation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352396417301421AgingBiomarkerPredictionEpigenetic clockTelomere length
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Juulia Jylhävä
Nancy L. Pedersen
Sara Hägg
spellingShingle Juulia Jylhävä
Nancy L. Pedersen
Sara Hägg
Biological Age Predictors
EBioMedicine
Aging
Biomarker
Prediction
Epigenetic clock
Telomere length
author_facet Juulia Jylhävä
Nancy L. Pedersen
Sara Hägg
author_sort Juulia Jylhävä
title Biological Age Predictors
title_short Biological Age Predictors
title_full Biological Age Predictors
title_fullStr Biological Age Predictors
title_full_unstemmed Biological Age Predictors
title_sort biological age predictors
publisher Elsevier
series EBioMedicine
issn 2352-3964
publishDate 2017-07-01
description The search for reliable indicators of biological age, rather than chronological age, has been ongoing for over three decades, and until recently, largely without success. Advances in the fields of molecular biology have increased the variety of potential candidate biomarkers that may be considered as biological age predictors. In this review, we summarize current state-of-the-art findings considering six potential types of biological age predictors: epigenetic clocks, telomere length, transcriptomic predictors, proteomic predictors, metabolomics-based predictors, and composite biomarker predictors. Promising developments consider multiple combinations of these various types of predictors, which may shed light on the aging process and provide further understanding of what contributes to healthy aging. Thus far, the most promising, new biological age predictor is the epigenetic clock; however its true value as a biomarker of aging requires longitudinal confirmation.
topic Aging
Biomarker
Prediction
Epigenetic clock
Telomere length
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352396417301421
work_keys_str_mv AT juuliajylhava biologicalagepredictors
AT nancylpedersen biologicalagepredictors
AT sarahagg biologicalagepredictors
_version_ 1725419590634176512