Comparison of five commonly used automated susceptibility testing methods for accuracy in the China Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (CARSS) hospitals
Menglan Zhou,1–3 Yao Wang,1,3 Chang Liu,1–3 Timothy Kudinha,4 Xiaolin Liu,5,6 Yanping Luo,7 Qiwen Yang,1,3,6 Hongli Sun,1,3,6 Jihong Hu,8 Ying-Chun Xu1,3,6 1Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of...
Main Authors: | Zhou ML, Wang Y, Liu C, Kudinha T, Liu X, Luo Y, Yang QW, Sun H, Hu J, Xu YC |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2018-08-01
|
Series: | Infection and Drug Resistance |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-five-commonly-used-automated-susceptibility-testing-meth-peer-reviewed-article-IDR |
Similar Items
-
Evaluating Localization Accuracy of Automated Driving Systems
by: Karl Rehrl, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
Accuracy of biometry using automated and manual keratometry for intraocular lens power calculation
by: Lubna Khan, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Evaluation of the automated system Vitek2 for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Brazilian Gram-positive cocci strains
by: Pedro Alves d'Azevedo, et al. -
Automated brain volumetric measures with AccuBrain: version comparison in accuracy, reproducibility and application for diagnosis
by: Luo, Y., et al.
Published: (2022) -
Design Automation of Approximate Circuits With Runtime Reconfigurable Accuracy
by: Georgios Zervakis, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)