Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood?

AI designers endeavour to improve ‘autonomy’ in artificial intelligent devices, as recent developments show. This chapter firstly argues against attributing metaphysical attitudes to AI and, simultaneously, in favor of improving autonomous AI which has been enabled to respect autonomy in human agen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ewa Nowak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Adam Mickiewicz University 2017-12-01
Series:Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fped/article/view/13198
id doaj-cfed5f181472436fa092a19627a18b5b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cfed5f181472436fa092a19627a18b5b2021-08-02T14:47:52ZengAdam Mickiewicz UniversityFilozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna2299-18752017-12-016210.14746/fped.2017.6.2.2013198Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood?Ewa Nowak0Instytut Filozofii, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu AI designers endeavour to improve ‘autonomy’ in artificial intelligent devices, as recent developments show. This chapter firstly argues against attributing metaphysical attitudes to AI and, simultaneously, in favor of improving autonomous AI which has been enabled to respect autonomy in human agents. This seems to be the only responsible way of making further advances in the field of autonomous social AI. Let us examine what is meant by claims such as designing our artificial alter egos and sharing moral selves with artificial humanoid devices as well as providing autonomous AI with an ethical framework modelled upon the core aspects of moral selfhood, e.g., making decisions which are based on autonomous law-giving, in Kantian terms. https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fped/article/view/13198autonomous artificial intelligenceautonomycategorical imperativesocial AIethics for AI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ewa Nowak
spellingShingle Ewa Nowak
Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood?
Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna
autonomous artificial intelligence
autonomy
categorical imperative
social AI
ethics for AI
author_facet Ewa Nowak
author_sort Ewa Nowak
title Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood?
title_short Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood?
title_full Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood?
title_fullStr Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood?
title_full_unstemmed Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood?
title_sort can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood?
publisher Adam Mickiewicz University
series Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna
issn 2299-1875
publishDate 2017-12-01
description AI designers endeavour to improve ‘autonomy’ in artificial intelligent devices, as recent developments show. This chapter firstly argues against attributing metaphysical attitudes to AI and, simultaneously, in favor of improving autonomous AI which has been enabled to respect autonomy in human agents. This seems to be the only responsible way of making further advances in the field of autonomous social AI. Let us examine what is meant by claims such as designing our artificial alter egos and sharing moral selves with artificial humanoid devices as well as providing autonomous AI with an ethical framework modelled upon the core aspects of moral selfhood, e.g., making decisions which are based on autonomous law-giving, in Kantian terms.
topic autonomous artificial intelligence
autonomy
categorical imperative
social AI
ethics for AI
url https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fped/article/view/13198
work_keys_str_mv AT ewanowak canhumanandartificialagentsshareanautonomycategoricalimperativebasedethicsandmoralselfhood
_version_ 1721230966560653312