Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood?
AI designers endeavour to improve ‘autonomy’ in artificial intelligent devices, as recent developments show. This chapter firstly argues against attributing metaphysical attitudes to AI and, simultaneously, in favor of improving autonomous AI which has been enabled to respect autonomy in human agen...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Adam Mickiewicz University
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fped/article/view/13198 |
id |
doaj-cfed5f181472436fa092a19627a18b5b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cfed5f181472436fa092a19627a18b5b2021-08-02T14:47:52ZengAdam Mickiewicz UniversityFilozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna2299-18752017-12-016210.14746/fped.2017.6.2.2013198Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood?Ewa Nowak0Instytut Filozofii, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu AI designers endeavour to improve ‘autonomy’ in artificial intelligent devices, as recent developments show. This chapter firstly argues against attributing metaphysical attitudes to AI and, simultaneously, in favor of improving autonomous AI which has been enabled to respect autonomy in human agents. This seems to be the only responsible way of making further advances in the field of autonomous social AI. Let us examine what is meant by claims such as designing our artificial alter egos and sharing moral selves with artificial humanoid devices as well as providing autonomous AI with an ethical framework modelled upon the core aspects of moral selfhood, e.g., making decisions which are based on autonomous law-giving, in Kantian terms. https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fped/article/view/13198autonomous artificial intelligenceautonomycategorical imperativesocial AIethics for AI |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ewa Nowak |
spellingShingle |
Ewa Nowak Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood? Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna autonomous artificial intelligence autonomy categorical imperative social AI ethics for AI |
author_facet |
Ewa Nowak |
author_sort |
Ewa Nowak |
title |
Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood? |
title_short |
Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood? |
title_full |
Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood? |
title_fullStr |
Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood? |
title_sort |
can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood? |
publisher |
Adam Mickiewicz University |
series |
Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna |
issn |
2299-1875 |
publishDate |
2017-12-01 |
description |
AI designers endeavour to improve ‘autonomy’ in artificial intelligent devices, as recent developments show. This chapter firstly argues against attributing metaphysical attitudes to AI and, simultaneously, in favor of improving autonomous AI which has been enabled to respect autonomy in human agents. This seems to be the only responsible way of making further advances in the field of autonomous social AI. Let us examine what is meant by claims such as designing our artificial alter egos and sharing moral selves with artificial humanoid devices as well as providing autonomous AI with an ethical framework modelled upon the core aspects of moral selfhood, e.g., making decisions which are based on autonomous law-giving, in Kantian terms.
|
topic |
autonomous artificial intelligence autonomy categorical imperative social AI ethics for AI |
url |
https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fped/article/view/13198 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ewanowak canhumanandartificialagentsshareanautonomycategoricalimperativebasedethicsandmoralselfhood |
_version_ |
1721230966560653312 |