Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood?
AI designers endeavour to improve ‘autonomy’ in artificial intelligent devices, as recent developments show. This chapter firstly argues against attributing metaphysical attitudes to AI and, simultaneously, in favor of improving autonomous AI which has been enabled to respect autonomy in human agen...
Main Author: | Ewa Nowak |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Adam Mickiewicz University
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fped/article/view/13198 |
Similar Items
-
WHY DOES KANT THINK THAT MORAL REQUIREMENTS ARE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVES?
by: Mejia, Maria
Published: (2016) -
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE AND LEADERSHIP IN EDUCATION
by: Konstantun Pokotylo
Published: (2015-12-01) -
The categorical imperative of the karma-yogin
by: Chernov S. A.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
The Universal Law of Nature Formulation of the Categorical Imperative
by: Maldonado, Dylan
Published: (2013) -
Corporate social responsibility in the light of Kant’s categorical imperative
by: Krzysztof Tapek
Published: (2018-11-01)