Survey of the practices of neonatologists in managing neonates believed to be at high risk of sleep disordered breathing

• Main Authors: Bhavesh Mehta, Dominic Fitzgerald
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-01
• Series: BMJ Paediatrics Open
• Online Access: https://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000979.full

Objective To determine the practices of neonatologists in managing high-risk neonates believed to be at risk of sleep disordered breathing (SDB).Design An electronic web-based questionnaire assessing awareness of and current practices for managing neonates predisposed to SDB with conditions like craniofacial anomalies, neuromuscular disorders or airway problems was emailed to 232 neonatologists and neonatal fellows working in Australia and New Zealand (NZ). Additionally, neonatologists were approached directly during the annual Australia and NZ perinatal conference in 2019.Results 93 neonatologists (40%) responded to the survey. The majority (85%) of the respondents stated that there were no written protocols/criteria for sleep consultation in their unit. We found considerable variations in the threshold for performing tests including oximetry or referring for polysomnography. Most respondents would perform oximetry before referring for a sleep consultation. However, the duration of oximetry varied from 6 to 24 hours and there was no consensus about what is considered abnormal on an oximetry study.Conclusion Management of SDB is gaining importance in neonatal care because of prolonged length of hospital stay and possible long-term effects of SDB. Responses received suggest a lack of clarity regarding thresholds for referral for treatment of SDB. Likely contributory factors are concerns regarding a lack of long-term outcome data from treatment perceived to be onerous for the family, unsettling to some infants and delaying hospital discharge. To overcome inconsistencies in practice, standardised guidelines for assessing and managing SDB in neonates are needed.