Averaging bias correction for the future space-borne methane IPDA lidar mission MERLIN

• Main Authors: Y. Tellier, C. Pierangelo, M. Wirth, F. Gibert, F. Marnas
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-10-01
• Series: Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
• Online Access: https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/11/5865/2018/amt-11-5865-2018.pdf

<p>The CNES (French Space Agency) and DLR (German Space Agency) project MERLIN is a future integrated path differential absorption (IPDA) lidar satellite mission that aims at measuring methane dry-air mixing ratio columns (<i>X</i>_CH₄) in order to improve surface flux estimates of this key greenhouse gas. To reach a 1&thinsp;% relative random error on <i>X</i>_CH₄ measurements, MERLIN signal processing performs an averaging of data over 50&thinsp;km along the satellite trajectory. This article discusses how to process this horizontal averaging in order to avoid the bias caused by the non-linearity of the measurement equation and measurements affected by random noise and horizontal geophysical variability. Three averaging schemes are presented: averaging of columns of <i>X</i>_CH₄, averaging of columns of differential absorption optical depth (DAOD) and averaging of signals. The three schemes are affected both by statistical and geophysical biases that are discussed and compared, and correction algorithms are developed for the three schemes. These algorithms are tested and their biases are compared on modelled scenes from real satellite data. To achieve the accuracy requirements that are limited to 0.2&thinsp;% relative systematic error (for a reference value of 1780&thinsp;ppb), we recommend performing the averaging of signals corrected from the statistical bias due to the measurement noise and from the geophysical bias mainly due to variations of methane optical depth and surface reflectivity along the averaging track. The proposed method is compliant with the mission relative systematic error requirements dedicated to averaging algorithms of 0.06&thinsp;% (±1&thinsp;ppb for <i>X</i>_CH₄ = 1780 ppb) for all tested scenes and all tested ground reflectivity values.</p>