Response to: Brief Comments on “Siddhis and Psi Research: An Interdisciplinary Analysis”
In his brief comments on “Siddhis and Psi Research: An Interdisciplinary Analysis,” Ed Kelly expresses disappointment that the paper does not mirror his worldview, which includes questioning the reality of psi—especially precognition, accepting post-mortem survival and observational evidence for m...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Indiana University Press
2017-06-01
|
| Series: | Journal of World Philosophies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://scholarworks.iu.edu/iupjournals/index.php/jwp/article/view/931/109 |
| Summary: | In his brief comments on “Siddhis and Psi Research: An Interdisciplinary Analysis,” Ed Kelly expresses
disappointment that the paper does not mirror his worldview, which includes questioning the reality of psi—especially
precognition, accepting post-mortem survival and observational evidence for macro-PK including levitation. In this brief
response to Kelly, I provide arguments in support of informational psi, particularly precognition, and in favor of a
physicalist, signal-based approach to psi, with brief points against the validity of micro-PK (mind-over-matter) and
post-mortem survival. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2474-1795 |