Reform of Civil Justice in Ukraine: A Differentiation of Action Proceedings and Review of Court Decisions

[full article, abstract in English, abstract in Russian] During the reform of 2014–2017 Ukrainian legislation was approved significantly, among them the Constitution, laws, related to judiciary and litigation, enforcement as well. The advocacy reform is last. This has led to the evolutionary ren...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Iryna Izarova
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Vilnius University Press 2019-05-01
Series:Teisė
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journals.vu.lt/teise/article/view/12828
id doaj-d084e96e77194a3498f8e212e6d8d8bf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d084e96e77194a3498f8e212e6d8d8bf2020-11-24T20:48:54ZdeuVilnius University PressTeisė1392-12742424-60502019-05-0111110.15388/Teise.2019.111.14Reform of Civil Justice in Ukraine: A Differentiation of Action Proceedings and Review of Court DecisionsIryna Izarova0Taras Shevchenko National University [full article, abstract in English, abstract in Russian] During the reform of 2014–2017 Ukrainian legislation was approved significantly, among them the Constitution, laws, related to judiciary and litigation, enforcement as well. The advocacy reform is last. This has led to the evolutionary renewal of justice in Ukraine, which was positively faced by the international community.  This article proposes to consider some components of civil justice reform, which were substantially updated, as well as to analyse their compliance with international and European standards. This refers to (1) a general review of judicial statistics and (2) new approaches to the trial of a court of first instance – order, simplified, general proceedings, criteria for demarcation of civil cases (3), and (4) peculiarities of settling a dispute with the participation of a judge. The conclusions summarize the most progressive results of reforms, as well as make suggestions on further development of the potential of civil justice. http://www.journals.vu.lt/teise/article/view/12828court of first instancejudgecivil justice reformdemarcation of civil casesjudicial statistics
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Iryna Izarova
spellingShingle Iryna Izarova
Reform of Civil Justice in Ukraine: A Differentiation of Action Proceedings and Review of Court Decisions
Teisė
court of first instance
judge
civil justice reform
demarcation of civil cases
judicial statistics
author_facet Iryna Izarova
author_sort Iryna Izarova
title Reform of Civil Justice in Ukraine: A Differentiation of Action Proceedings and Review of Court Decisions
title_short Reform of Civil Justice in Ukraine: A Differentiation of Action Proceedings and Review of Court Decisions
title_full Reform of Civil Justice in Ukraine: A Differentiation of Action Proceedings and Review of Court Decisions
title_fullStr Reform of Civil Justice in Ukraine: A Differentiation of Action Proceedings and Review of Court Decisions
title_full_unstemmed Reform of Civil Justice in Ukraine: A Differentiation of Action Proceedings and Review of Court Decisions
title_sort reform of civil justice in ukraine: a differentiation of action proceedings and review of court decisions
publisher Vilnius University Press
series Teisė
issn 1392-1274
2424-6050
publishDate 2019-05-01
description [full article, abstract in English, abstract in Russian] During the reform of 2014–2017 Ukrainian legislation was approved significantly, among them the Constitution, laws, related to judiciary and litigation, enforcement as well. The advocacy reform is last. This has led to the evolutionary renewal of justice in Ukraine, which was positively faced by the international community.  This article proposes to consider some components of civil justice reform, which were substantially updated, as well as to analyse their compliance with international and European standards. This refers to (1) a general review of judicial statistics and (2) new approaches to the trial of a court of first instance – order, simplified, general proceedings, criteria for demarcation of civil cases (3), and (4) peculiarities of settling a dispute with the participation of a judge. The conclusions summarize the most progressive results of reforms, as well as make suggestions on further development of the potential of civil justice.
topic court of first instance
judge
civil justice reform
demarcation of civil cases
judicial statistics
url http://www.journals.vu.lt/teise/article/view/12828
work_keys_str_mv AT irynaizarova reformofciviljusticeinukraineadifferentiationofactionproceedingsandreviewofcourtdecisions
_version_ 1716807502962622464