Religious Leaders and Elections in the Polarizing Context of Indonesia
Studies of elections in young democracies point to the risk of elections intensifying existing social conflicts, a process observed in Indonesia in recent years. The 2017 mayoral election in Yogyakarta contradicts this trend, presenting an empirical puzzle. Despite the fact that local conditions mig...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universitas Gadjah Mada
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Humaniora |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jurnal-humaniora/article/view/49420 |
id |
doaj-d09d2a9cb9fb4a4b952669b55ad163ab |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d09d2a9cb9fb4a4b952669b55ad163ab2020-11-24T23:59:27ZengUniversitas Gadjah MadaHumaniora0852-08012302-92692019-10-0131322723710.22146/jh.v31i3.4942025042Religious Leaders and Elections in the Polarizing Context of IndonesiaM. Iqbal Ahnaf0Danielle N. Lussier1Center for Religious and Cross-cultural Studies, Universitas Gadjah MadaDepartment of Political Science, Grinnell CollegeStudies of elections in young democracies point to the risk of elections intensifying existing social conflicts, a process observed in Indonesia in recent years. The 2017 mayoral election in Yogyakarta contradicts this trend, presenting an empirical puzzle. Despite the fact that local conditions might encourage electoral mobilization along sectarian lines, we find evidence of restraint. Based on analysis of the contents of sermons in 12 mosques and churches in the month before the election we identify three factors that discourage religious leaders from exercising opportunities to intensify religious tension. These include (a) elites were not motivated to exacerbate communal tension because they do not feel the election will bring about reform or change that would seriously affect their established position, (b) even though sectarian messaging is possible, the elites did not believe masses could be easily persuaded by sectarian political messaging, and (c) political outbidding by using sectarian messages would risk confronting the local dominant culture of harmony. These findings suggest that several factors need to be activated for religious leaders to exercise their moral authority over worshippers for political purposes. The presence of an opportunity structure for intensifying sectarian conflict is not sufficient for that conflict to emerge.https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jurnal-humaniora/article/view/49420electionviolencereligiontolerancesermon |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
M. Iqbal Ahnaf Danielle N. Lussier |
spellingShingle |
M. Iqbal Ahnaf Danielle N. Lussier Religious Leaders and Elections in the Polarizing Context of Indonesia Humaniora election violence religion tolerance sermon |
author_facet |
M. Iqbal Ahnaf Danielle N. Lussier |
author_sort |
M. Iqbal Ahnaf |
title |
Religious Leaders and Elections in the Polarizing Context of Indonesia |
title_short |
Religious Leaders and Elections in the Polarizing Context of Indonesia |
title_full |
Religious Leaders and Elections in the Polarizing Context of Indonesia |
title_fullStr |
Religious Leaders and Elections in the Polarizing Context of Indonesia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Religious Leaders and Elections in the Polarizing Context of Indonesia |
title_sort |
religious leaders and elections in the polarizing context of indonesia |
publisher |
Universitas Gadjah Mada |
series |
Humaniora |
issn |
0852-0801 2302-9269 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Studies of elections in young democracies point to the risk of elections intensifying existing social conflicts, a process observed in Indonesia in recent years. The 2017 mayoral election in Yogyakarta contradicts this trend, presenting an empirical puzzle. Despite the fact that local conditions might encourage electoral mobilization along sectarian lines, we find evidence of restraint. Based on analysis of the contents of sermons in 12 mosques and churches in the month before the election we identify three factors that discourage religious leaders from exercising opportunities to intensify religious tension. These include (a) elites were not motivated to exacerbate communal tension because they do not feel the election will bring about reform or change that would seriously affect their established position, (b) even though sectarian messaging is possible, the elites did not believe masses could be easily persuaded by sectarian political messaging, and (c) political outbidding by using sectarian messages would risk confronting the local dominant culture of harmony. These findings suggest that several factors need to be activated for religious leaders to exercise their moral authority over worshippers for political purposes. The presence of an opportunity structure for intensifying sectarian conflict is not sufficient for that conflict to emerge. |
topic |
election violence religion tolerance sermon |
url |
https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jurnal-humaniora/article/view/49420 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT miqbalahnaf religiousleadersandelectionsinthepolarizingcontextofindonesia AT daniellenlussier religiousleadersandelectionsinthepolarizingcontextofindonesia |
_version_ |
1725448040437776384 |