Religious Leaders and Elections in the Polarizing Context of Indonesia

Studies of elections in young democracies point to the risk of elections intensifying existing social conflicts, a process observed in Indonesia in recent years. The 2017 mayoral election in Yogyakarta contradicts this trend, presenting an empirical puzzle. Despite the fact that local conditions mig...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Iqbal Ahnaf, Danielle N. Lussier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Gadjah Mada 2019-10-01
Series:Humaniora
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jurnal-humaniora/article/view/49420
id doaj-d09d2a9cb9fb4a4b952669b55ad163ab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d09d2a9cb9fb4a4b952669b55ad163ab2020-11-24T23:59:27ZengUniversitas Gadjah MadaHumaniora0852-08012302-92692019-10-0131322723710.22146/jh.v31i3.4942025042Religious Leaders and Elections in the Polarizing Context of IndonesiaM. Iqbal Ahnaf0Danielle N. Lussier1Center for Religious and Cross-cultural Studies, Universitas Gadjah MadaDepartment of Political Science, Grinnell CollegeStudies of elections in young democracies point to the risk of elections intensifying existing social conflicts, a process observed in Indonesia in recent years. The 2017 mayoral election in Yogyakarta contradicts this trend, presenting an empirical puzzle. Despite the fact that local conditions might encourage electoral mobilization along sectarian lines, we find evidence of restraint. Based on analysis of the contents of sermons in 12 mosques and churches in the month before the election we identify three factors that discourage religious leaders from exercising opportunities to intensify religious tension. These include (a) elites were not motivated to exacerbate communal tension because they do not feel the election will bring about reform or change that would seriously affect their established position, (b) even though sectarian messaging is possible, the elites did not believe masses could be easily persuaded by sectarian political messaging, and (c) political outbidding by using sectarian messages would risk confronting the local dominant culture of harmony. These findings suggest that several factors need to be activated for religious leaders to exercise their moral authority over worshippers for political purposes. The presence of an opportunity structure for intensifying sectarian conflict is not sufficient for that conflict to emerge.https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jurnal-humaniora/article/view/49420electionviolencereligiontolerancesermon
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Iqbal Ahnaf
Danielle N. Lussier
spellingShingle M. Iqbal Ahnaf
Danielle N. Lussier
Religious Leaders and Elections in the Polarizing Context of Indonesia
Humaniora
election
violence
religion
tolerance
sermon
author_facet M. Iqbal Ahnaf
Danielle N. Lussier
author_sort M. Iqbal Ahnaf
title Religious Leaders and Elections in the Polarizing Context of Indonesia
title_short Religious Leaders and Elections in the Polarizing Context of Indonesia
title_full Religious Leaders and Elections in the Polarizing Context of Indonesia
title_fullStr Religious Leaders and Elections in the Polarizing Context of Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Religious Leaders and Elections in the Polarizing Context of Indonesia
title_sort religious leaders and elections in the polarizing context of indonesia
publisher Universitas Gadjah Mada
series Humaniora
issn 0852-0801
2302-9269
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Studies of elections in young democracies point to the risk of elections intensifying existing social conflicts, a process observed in Indonesia in recent years. The 2017 mayoral election in Yogyakarta contradicts this trend, presenting an empirical puzzle. Despite the fact that local conditions might encourage electoral mobilization along sectarian lines, we find evidence of restraint. Based on analysis of the contents of sermons in 12 mosques and churches in the month before the election we identify three factors that discourage religious leaders from exercising opportunities to intensify religious tension. These include (a) elites were not motivated to exacerbate communal tension because they do not feel the election will bring about reform or change that would seriously affect their established position, (b) even though sectarian messaging is possible, the elites did not believe masses could be easily persuaded by sectarian political messaging, and (c) political outbidding by using sectarian messages would risk confronting the local dominant culture of harmony. These findings suggest that several factors need to be activated for religious leaders to exercise their moral authority over worshippers for political purposes. The presence of an opportunity structure for intensifying sectarian conflict is not sufficient for that conflict to emerge.
topic election
violence
religion
tolerance
sermon
url https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jurnal-humaniora/article/view/49420
work_keys_str_mv AT miqbalahnaf religiousleadersandelectionsinthepolarizingcontextofindonesia
AT daniellenlussier religiousleadersandelectionsinthepolarizingcontextofindonesia
_version_ 1725448040437776384