Scientific Comparison of Different Online Heart Rate Monitoring Systems

Recent technical development focused on real-time heart rate monitoring instead of postexercise evaluation of recorded data. There are several systems on the market that allow direct and real-time monitoring of several individuals at the same time. The present study compared the systems of Polar, Ac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Schönfelder, Georg Hinterseher, Philipp Peter, Peter Spitzenpfeil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2011-01-01
Series:International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/631848
id doaj-d0af1368e5fb4197b6bbb28b9ee95923
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d0af1368e5fb4197b6bbb28b9ee959232020-11-25T01:12:55ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Telemedicine and Applications1687-64151687-64232011-01-01201110.1155/2011/631848631848Scientific Comparison of Different Online Heart Rate Monitoring SystemsMartin Schönfelder0Georg Hinterseher1Philipp Peter2Peter Spitzenpfeil3Institute of Public Health Research, Technical University of Munich, Connollystraße 32, 80809 Munich, GermanyInstitute of Public Health Research, Technical University of Munich, Connollystraße 32, 80809 Munich, GermanyInstitute of Public Health Research, Technical University of Munich, Connollystraße 32, 80809 Munich, GermanyFachgebiet für Trainingswissenschaftliche Diagnostik, Technische Universität München, Connollystraße 32, 80809 Munich, GermanyRecent technical development focused on real-time heart rate monitoring instead of postexercise evaluation of recorded data. There are several systems on the market that allow direct and real-time monitoring of several individuals at the same time. The present study compared the systems of Polar, Acentas, Activio, and Suunto in a field test with twelve subjects regarding failure quota, operating distance, and ECG validity. Moreover, the installation and use of software and hardware were evaluated with a quality rating system. Chest belts were evaluated with a questionnaire, too. Overall the system of Acentas reached the best mark of all systems, but detailed results showed that every system has its advantages and disadvantages depending on using purpose, location, and weather. So this evaluation cannot recommend a single system but rather shows strength and weakness of all systems and additionally can be used for further system improvements.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/631848
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martin Schönfelder
Georg Hinterseher
Philipp Peter
Peter Spitzenpfeil
spellingShingle Martin Schönfelder
Georg Hinterseher
Philipp Peter
Peter Spitzenpfeil
Scientific Comparison of Different Online Heart Rate Monitoring Systems
International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications
author_facet Martin Schönfelder
Georg Hinterseher
Philipp Peter
Peter Spitzenpfeil
author_sort Martin Schönfelder
title Scientific Comparison of Different Online Heart Rate Monitoring Systems
title_short Scientific Comparison of Different Online Heart Rate Monitoring Systems
title_full Scientific Comparison of Different Online Heart Rate Monitoring Systems
title_fullStr Scientific Comparison of Different Online Heart Rate Monitoring Systems
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Comparison of Different Online Heart Rate Monitoring Systems
title_sort scientific comparison of different online heart rate monitoring systems
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications
issn 1687-6415
1687-6423
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Recent technical development focused on real-time heart rate monitoring instead of postexercise evaluation of recorded data. There are several systems on the market that allow direct and real-time monitoring of several individuals at the same time. The present study compared the systems of Polar, Acentas, Activio, and Suunto in a field test with twelve subjects regarding failure quota, operating distance, and ECG validity. Moreover, the installation and use of software and hardware were evaluated with a quality rating system. Chest belts were evaluated with a questionnaire, too. Overall the system of Acentas reached the best mark of all systems, but detailed results showed that every system has its advantages and disadvantages depending on using purpose, location, and weather. So this evaluation cannot recommend a single system but rather shows strength and weakness of all systems and additionally can be used for further system improvements.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/631848
work_keys_str_mv AT martinschonfelder scientificcomparisonofdifferentonlineheartratemonitoringsystems
AT georghinterseher scientificcomparisonofdifferentonlineheartratemonitoringsystems
AT philipppeter scientificcomparisonofdifferentonlineheartratemonitoringsystems
AT peterspitzenpfeil scientificcomparisonofdifferentonlineheartratemonitoringsystems
_version_ 1725164442557087744