Comparison of Mendeliome exome capture kits for use in clinical diagnostics

Abstract Next generation sequencing has disrupted genetic testing, allowing far more scope in the tests applied. The appropriate sections of the genome to be tested can now be readily selected, from single mutations to whole-genome sequencing. One product offering within this spectrum are focused ex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reuben J. Pengelly, Daniel Ward, David Hunt, Christopher Mattocks, Sarah Ennis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2020-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60215-y
id doaj-d0ff4ef14c084a28b6648af15e4ab6eb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d0ff4ef14c084a28b6648af15e4ab6eb2021-02-23T09:31:31ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222020-02-011011710.1038/s41598-020-60215-yComparison of Mendeliome exome capture kits for use in clinical diagnosticsReuben J. Pengelly0Daniel Ward1David Hunt2Christopher Mattocks3Sarah Ennis4Human Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of SouthamptonNational Genetics Reference Laboratory (Wessex), Salisbury District HospitalWessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne HospitalNational Genetics Reference Laboratory (Wessex), Salisbury District HospitalHuman Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of SouthamptonAbstract Next generation sequencing has disrupted genetic testing, allowing far more scope in the tests applied. The appropriate sections of the genome to be tested can now be readily selected, from single mutations to whole-genome sequencing. One product offering within this spectrum are focused exomes, targeting ~5,000 genes know to be implicated in human disease. These are designed to offer a flexible platform offering high diagnostic yield with a reduction in sequencing requirement compared to whole exome sequencing. Here, we have undertaken sequencing of control DNA samples and compare two kits, the Illumina TruSight One and the Agilent SureSelect Focused Exome. Characteristics of the kits are comprehensively evaluated. Despite the larger design region of the Agilent kit, we find that the Illumina kit performs better in terms of gene coverage, as well as coverage of clinically relevant loci. We provide exhaustive coverage statistics for each kit to aid the assessment of their suitability and provide read data for control DNA samples to allow for bioinformatic benchmarking by users developing pipelines for these data.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60215-y
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Reuben J. Pengelly
Daniel Ward
David Hunt
Christopher Mattocks
Sarah Ennis
spellingShingle Reuben J. Pengelly
Daniel Ward
David Hunt
Christopher Mattocks
Sarah Ennis
Comparison of Mendeliome exome capture kits for use in clinical diagnostics
Scientific Reports
author_facet Reuben J. Pengelly
Daniel Ward
David Hunt
Christopher Mattocks
Sarah Ennis
author_sort Reuben J. Pengelly
title Comparison of Mendeliome exome capture kits for use in clinical diagnostics
title_short Comparison of Mendeliome exome capture kits for use in clinical diagnostics
title_full Comparison of Mendeliome exome capture kits for use in clinical diagnostics
title_fullStr Comparison of Mendeliome exome capture kits for use in clinical diagnostics
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Mendeliome exome capture kits for use in clinical diagnostics
title_sort comparison of mendeliome exome capture kits for use in clinical diagnostics
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Abstract Next generation sequencing has disrupted genetic testing, allowing far more scope in the tests applied. The appropriate sections of the genome to be tested can now be readily selected, from single mutations to whole-genome sequencing. One product offering within this spectrum are focused exomes, targeting ~5,000 genes know to be implicated in human disease. These are designed to offer a flexible platform offering high diagnostic yield with a reduction in sequencing requirement compared to whole exome sequencing. Here, we have undertaken sequencing of control DNA samples and compare two kits, the Illumina TruSight One and the Agilent SureSelect Focused Exome. Characteristics of the kits are comprehensively evaluated. Despite the larger design region of the Agilent kit, we find that the Illumina kit performs better in terms of gene coverage, as well as coverage of clinically relevant loci. We provide exhaustive coverage statistics for each kit to aid the assessment of their suitability and provide read data for control DNA samples to allow for bioinformatic benchmarking by users developing pipelines for these data.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60215-y
work_keys_str_mv AT reubenjpengelly comparisonofmendeliomeexomecapturekitsforuseinclinicaldiagnostics
AT danielward comparisonofmendeliomeexomecapturekitsforuseinclinicaldiagnostics
AT davidhunt comparisonofmendeliomeexomecapturekitsforuseinclinicaldiagnostics
AT christophermattocks comparisonofmendeliomeexomecapturekitsforuseinclinicaldiagnostics
AT sarahennis comparisonofmendeliomeexomecapturekitsforuseinclinicaldiagnostics
_version_ 1714850590382620672