Analytical Challenges for Neoinstitutional Theories of Institutional Change in Comparative Political Science
This article analyses the core critiques on institutional change theories within the neoinstitutional research agenda in comparative political science. If offers an explanatory typology using analytical challenges for the development of theories with new institutional approaches. This typology provi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Brazilian Political Science Association
2009-06-01
|
Series: | Brazilian Political Science Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.bpsr.org.br/index.php/bpsr/article/view/17/13 |
id |
doaj-d174d70d4fe44b659e6554f26da16777 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d174d70d4fe44b659e6554f26da167772020-11-24T21:09:57ZengBrazilian Political Science AssociationBrazilian Political Science Review1981-38211981-38212009-06-013298126Analytical Challenges for Neoinstitutional Theories of Institutional Change in Comparative Political ScienceFlávio Rezende0UFPEThis article analyses the core critiques on institutional change theories within the neoinstitutional research agenda in comparative political science. If offers an explanatory typology using analytical challenges for the development of theories with new institutional approaches. This typology provides key critical issues that should be seriously considered by political scientists when analyzing change. The framework suggests that the analytical challenges be posed in five interwoven dimensions: a) inclusion of institutional variables; b) agency and cognition; c) contextual sensitivity; d) increasing precision in the concept of institution (and institutional change); and, e) recursive interaction between agents and institutions in the process of institutional change. Based on these challenges, the article conducts a comparative analysis of the theories of change suggested by North and Aoki to understand how they deal with such issues.http://www.bpsr.org.br/index.php/bpsr/article/view/17/13Comparative political scienceinstitutional change theorynew institutionalismtheory and modelsresearch design |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Flávio Rezende |
spellingShingle |
Flávio Rezende Analytical Challenges for Neoinstitutional Theories of Institutional Change in Comparative Political Science Brazilian Political Science Review Comparative political science institutional change theory new institutionalism theory and models research design |
author_facet |
Flávio Rezende |
author_sort |
Flávio Rezende |
title |
Analytical Challenges for Neoinstitutional Theories of Institutional Change in Comparative Political Science |
title_short |
Analytical Challenges for Neoinstitutional Theories of Institutional Change in Comparative Political Science |
title_full |
Analytical Challenges for Neoinstitutional Theories of Institutional Change in Comparative Political Science |
title_fullStr |
Analytical Challenges for Neoinstitutional Theories of Institutional Change in Comparative Political Science |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analytical Challenges for Neoinstitutional Theories of Institutional Change in Comparative Political Science |
title_sort |
analytical challenges for neoinstitutional theories of institutional change in comparative political science |
publisher |
Brazilian Political Science Association |
series |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
issn |
1981-3821 1981-3821 |
publishDate |
2009-06-01 |
description |
This article analyses the core critiques on institutional change theories within the neoinstitutional research agenda in comparative political science. If offers an explanatory typology using analytical challenges for the development of theories with new institutional approaches. This typology provides key critical issues that should be seriously considered by political scientists when analyzing change. The framework suggests that the analytical challenges be posed in five interwoven dimensions: a) inclusion of institutional variables; b) agency and cognition; c) contextual sensitivity; d) increasing precision in the concept of institution (and institutional change); and, e) recursive interaction between agents and institutions in the process of institutional change. Based on these challenges, the article conducts a comparative analysis of the theories of change suggested by North and Aoki to understand how they deal with such issues. |
topic |
Comparative political science institutional change theory new institutionalism theory and models research design |
url |
http://www.bpsr.org.br/index.php/bpsr/article/view/17/13 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT flaviorezende analyticalchallengesforneoinstitutionaltheoriesofinstitutionalchangeincomparativepoliticalscience |
_version_ |
1716756892374532096 |