The Value of Tropical Forest to Local Communities: Complications, Caveats, and Cautions

The methods used to value tropical forests have the potential to influence how policy makers and others perceive forest lands. A small number of valuation studies achieve real impact. These are generally succinct accounts supporting a specific perception. However, such reports risk being used to jus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Douglas Sheil, Sven Wunder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2002-12-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol6/iss2/art9/
id doaj-d1a1800199a546858ebfbc30a16c66f1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d1a1800199a546858ebfbc30a16c66f12020-11-24T22:43:52ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872002-12-0162910.5751/ES-00458-060209458The Value of Tropical Forest to Local Communities: Complications, Caveats, and CautionsDouglas Sheil0Sven Wunder1CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research)CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research)The methods used to value tropical forests have the potential to influence how policy makers and others perceive forest lands. A small number of valuation studies achieve real impact. These are generally succinct accounts supporting a specific perception. However, such reports risk being used to justify inappropriate actions. The end users of such results are rarely those who produced them, and misunderstanding of key details is a concern. One defense is to ensure that shortcomings and common pitfalls are better appreciated by the ultimate users. In this article, we aim to reduce such risks by discussing how valuation studies should be assessed and challenged by users. We consider two concise, high-profile valuation papers here, by Peters and colleagues and by Godoy and colleagues. We illustrate a series of questions that should be asked, not only about the two papers, but also about any landscape valuation study. We highlight the many challenges faced in valuing tropical forest lands and in presenting and using the results sensibly, and we offer some suggestions for improvement. Attention to complexities and clarity about uncertainties are required. Forest valuation must be pursued and promoted with caution.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol6/iss2/art9/cultural anthropologyforest valuationindigenous peopleland-use changelivelihood securitylocal participationmeasurement biasesnontimber forest productspolicy prioritiestropical deforestationunit-area valuesunit-time values
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Douglas Sheil
Sven Wunder
spellingShingle Douglas Sheil
Sven Wunder
The Value of Tropical Forest to Local Communities: Complications, Caveats, and Cautions
Ecology and Society
cultural anthropology
forest valuation
indigenous people
land-use change
livelihood security
local participation
measurement biases
nontimber forest products
policy priorities
tropical deforestation
unit-area values
unit-time values
author_facet Douglas Sheil
Sven Wunder
author_sort Douglas Sheil
title The Value of Tropical Forest to Local Communities: Complications, Caveats, and Cautions
title_short The Value of Tropical Forest to Local Communities: Complications, Caveats, and Cautions
title_full The Value of Tropical Forest to Local Communities: Complications, Caveats, and Cautions
title_fullStr The Value of Tropical Forest to Local Communities: Complications, Caveats, and Cautions
title_full_unstemmed The Value of Tropical Forest to Local Communities: Complications, Caveats, and Cautions
title_sort value of tropical forest to local communities: complications, caveats, and cautions
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2002-12-01
description The methods used to value tropical forests have the potential to influence how policy makers and others perceive forest lands. A small number of valuation studies achieve real impact. These are generally succinct accounts supporting a specific perception. However, such reports risk being used to justify inappropriate actions. The end users of such results are rarely those who produced them, and misunderstanding of key details is a concern. One defense is to ensure that shortcomings and common pitfalls are better appreciated by the ultimate users. In this article, we aim to reduce such risks by discussing how valuation studies should be assessed and challenged by users. We consider two concise, high-profile valuation papers here, by Peters and colleagues and by Godoy and colleagues. We illustrate a series of questions that should be asked, not only about the two papers, but also about any landscape valuation study. We highlight the many challenges faced in valuing tropical forest lands and in presenting and using the results sensibly, and we offer some suggestions for improvement. Attention to complexities and clarity about uncertainties are required. Forest valuation must be pursued and promoted with caution.
topic cultural anthropology
forest valuation
indigenous people
land-use change
livelihood security
local participation
measurement biases
nontimber forest products
policy priorities
tropical deforestation
unit-area values
unit-time values
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol6/iss2/art9/
work_keys_str_mv AT douglassheil thevalueoftropicalforesttolocalcommunitiescomplicationscaveatsandcautions
AT svenwunder thevalueoftropicalforesttolocalcommunitiescomplicationscaveatsandcautions
AT douglassheil valueoftropicalforesttolocalcommunitiescomplicationscaveatsandcautions
AT svenwunder valueoftropicalforesttolocalcommunitiescomplicationscaveatsandcautions
_version_ 1716475804010938368