The Value of Tropical Forest to Local Communities: Complications, Caveats, and Cautions
The methods used to value tropical forests have the potential to influence how policy makers and others perceive forest lands. A small number of valuation studies achieve real impact. These are generally succinct accounts supporting a specific perception. However, such reports risk being used to jus...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2002-12-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol6/iss2/art9/ |
id |
doaj-d1a1800199a546858ebfbc30a16c66f1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d1a1800199a546858ebfbc30a16c66f12020-11-24T22:43:52ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872002-12-0162910.5751/ES-00458-060209458The Value of Tropical Forest to Local Communities: Complications, Caveats, and CautionsDouglas Sheil0Sven Wunder1CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research)CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research)The methods used to value tropical forests have the potential to influence how policy makers and others perceive forest lands. A small number of valuation studies achieve real impact. These are generally succinct accounts supporting a specific perception. However, such reports risk being used to justify inappropriate actions. The end users of such results are rarely those who produced them, and misunderstanding of key details is a concern. One defense is to ensure that shortcomings and common pitfalls are better appreciated by the ultimate users. In this article, we aim to reduce such risks by discussing how valuation studies should be assessed and challenged by users. We consider two concise, high-profile valuation papers here, by Peters and colleagues and by Godoy and colleagues. We illustrate a series of questions that should be asked, not only about the two papers, but also about any landscape valuation study. We highlight the many challenges faced in valuing tropical forest lands and in presenting and using the results sensibly, and we offer some suggestions for improvement. Attention to complexities and clarity about uncertainties are required. Forest valuation must be pursued and promoted with caution.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol6/iss2/art9/cultural anthropologyforest valuationindigenous peopleland-use changelivelihood securitylocal participationmeasurement biasesnontimber forest productspolicy prioritiestropical deforestationunit-area valuesunit-time values |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Douglas Sheil Sven Wunder |
spellingShingle |
Douglas Sheil Sven Wunder The Value of Tropical Forest to Local Communities: Complications, Caveats, and Cautions Ecology and Society cultural anthropology forest valuation indigenous people land-use change livelihood security local participation measurement biases nontimber forest products policy priorities tropical deforestation unit-area values unit-time values |
author_facet |
Douglas Sheil Sven Wunder |
author_sort |
Douglas Sheil |
title |
The Value of Tropical Forest to Local Communities: Complications, Caveats, and Cautions |
title_short |
The Value of Tropical Forest to Local Communities: Complications, Caveats, and Cautions |
title_full |
The Value of Tropical Forest to Local Communities: Complications, Caveats, and Cautions |
title_fullStr |
The Value of Tropical Forest to Local Communities: Complications, Caveats, and Cautions |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Value of Tropical Forest to Local Communities: Complications, Caveats, and Cautions |
title_sort |
value of tropical forest to local communities: complications, caveats, and cautions |
publisher |
Resilience Alliance |
series |
Ecology and Society |
issn |
1708-3087 |
publishDate |
2002-12-01 |
description |
The methods used to value tropical forests have the potential to influence how policy makers and others perceive forest lands. A small number of valuation studies achieve real impact. These are generally succinct accounts supporting a specific perception. However, such reports risk being used to justify inappropriate actions. The end users of such results are rarely those who produced them, and misunderstanding of key details is a concern. One defense is to ensure that shortcomings and common pitfalls are better appreciated by the ultimate users. In this article, we aim to reduce such risks by discussing how valuation studies should be assessed and challenged by users. We consider two concise, high-profile valuation papers here, by Peters and colleagues and by Godoy and colleagues. We illustrate a series of questions that should be asked, not only about the two papers, but also about any landscape valuation study. We highlight the many challenges faced in valuing tropical forest lands and in presenting and using the results sensibly, and we offer some suggestions for improvement. Attention to complexities and clarity about uncertainties are required. Forest valuation must be pursued and promoted with caution. |
topic |
cultural anthropology forest valuation indigenous people land-use change livelihood security local participation measurement biases nontimber forest products policy priorities tropical deforestation unit-area values unit-time values |
url |
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol6/iss2/art9/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT douglassheil thevalueoftropicalforesttolocalcommunitiescomplicationscaveatsandcautions AT svenwunder thevalueoftropicalforesttolocalcommunitiescomplicationscaveatsandcautions AT douglassheil valueoftropicalforesttolocalcommunitiescomplicationscaveatsandcautions AT svenwunder valueoftropicalforesttolocalcommunitiescomplicationscaveatsandcautions |
_version_ |
1716475804010938368 |