An integrated conceptual framework for evaluating and improving ‘understanding’ in informed consent

Abstract Background The development of understandable informed consent (IC) documents has proven to be one of the most important challenges in research with humans as well as in healthcare settings. Therefore, evaluating and improving understanding has been of increasing interest for empirical resea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sabine Bossert, Daniel Strech
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-10-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2204-0
Description
Summary:Abstract Background The development of understandable informed consent (IC) documents has proven to be one of the most important challenges in research with humans as well as in healthcare settings. Therefore, evaluating and improving understanding has been of increasing interest for empirical research on IC. However, several conceptual and practical challenges for the development of understandable IC documents remain unresolved. Methods In this paper, we will outline and systematize some of these challenges. On the basis of our own experiences in empirical user testing of IC documents as well as the relevant literature on understanding in IC, we propose an integrated conceptual model for the development of understandable IC documents. Results The proposed conceptual model integrates different methods for the participatory improvement of written information, including IC, as well as quantitative methods for measuring understanding in IC. Conclusions In most IC processes, understandable written information is an important prerequisite for valid IC. To improve the quality of IC documents, a conceptual model for participatory procedures of testing, revising, and retesting can be applied. However, the model presented in this paper needs further theoretical and empirical elaboration and clarification of several conceptual and practical challenges.
ISSN:1745-6215