Development of Analytical Methods to Quantify Perfluorooctane Sulfonate and Related Compounds in the Environment

<p>Analytical techniques based on <sup>19</sup>F NMR spectroscopy and HPLC-suppressed conductivity detection were developed to detect and quantify aqueous perfluoroctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluoroctanoic acid (PFOA), and perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS). Chromatographic separation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valeria de Lourdes Ochoa-Herrera, Jim A. Field, Reyes Sierra-Alvarez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad San Francisco de Quito 2011-12-01
Series:ACI Avances en Ciencias e Ingenierías
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.usfq.edu.ec/index.php/avances/article/view/63
Description
Summary:<p>Analytical techniques based on <sup>19</sup>F NMR spectroscopy and HPLC-suppressed conductivity detection were developed to detect and quantify aqueous perfluoroctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluoroctanoic acid (PFOA), and perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS). Chromatographic separation of the perfluoroalkyl surfactants (PFAS) was performed using a C<sup>18</sup> reversed-phase column and a mobile phase consisting of a mixture of boric acid and acetonitrile. The detection limit for PFOS by <sup>19</sup>F NMR was 3.6 mg L<sup>-1</sup>. The detection limit for PFOS, PFOA and PFBS by HPLC-suppressed conductivity detection was 1 mg L<sup>-1</sup>. The detection limits were shown to improve considerably if samples were pre-concentrated by solid-phase extraction. The detection limits for PFOS of pre-concentrated samples were 3.6 mg L<sup>-1</sup> and 10 ug L<sup>-1</sup> by <sup>19</sup>F NMR and HPLC-suppressed conductivity detection, respectively. Comparison of these two methodologies showed that HPLC-suppressed conductivity detection should be preferred for routine quantification of these contaminants due to its simplicity, time efficiency, and accuracy. Conversely, <sup>19</sup>F NMR can be used to characterize changes in the chemical structure of fluorinated compounds due to its inherent advantage of high specificity and no matrix interferences. The feasibility of utilizing total organic carbon (TOC) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) analysis for the quantitative detection of PFOS in aqueous samples was also investigated. Although, the TOC analysis provided reliable quantification of PFAS in aqueous samples, the non-specificity is a drawback of the technique. The dichromate-based COD method was found unsuitable for the analysis of PFOS due to the incomplete oxidation of the highly stable perfluorinated compound under the conditions evaluated.</p>
ISSN:1390-5384
2528-7788