Differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in the use of primary medical care; a systematic review

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Studies on differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in health care utilization vary with respect to the extent and direction of differences in use. Therefore, our study aimed to provide a systematic overview of the exis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Foets Marleen, Devillé Walter, Uiters Ellen, Spreeuwenberg Peter, Groenewegen Peter P
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-05-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/76
id doaj-d1d6b9407c1745be8748c29851583f8f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d1d6b9407c1745be8748c29851583f8f2020-11-25T01:55:01ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632009-05-01917610.1186/1472-6963-9-76Differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in the use of primary medical care; a systematic reviewFoets MarleenDevillé WalterUiters EllenSpreeuwenberg PeterGroenewegen Peter P<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Studies on differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in health care utilization vary with respect to the extent and direction of differences in use. Therefore, our study aimed to provide a systematic overview of the existing research on differences in primary care utilization between immigrant groups and the majority population.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>For this review PubMed, PsycInfo, Cinahl, Sociofile, Web of Science and Current Contents were consulted. Study selection and quality assessment was performed using a predefined protocol by 2 reviewers independently of each other. Only original, quantitative, peer-reviewed papers were taken into account. To account for this hierarchical structure, logistic multilevel analyses were performed to examine the extent to which differences are found across countries and immigrant groups. Differences in primary care use were related to study characteristics, strength of the primary care system and methodological quality.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 37 studies from 7 countries met all inclusion criteria. Remarkably, studies performed within the US more often reported a significant lower use among immigrant groups as compared to the majority population than the other countries. As studies scored higher on methodological quality, the likelihood of reporting significant differences increased. Adjustment for health status and use of culture-/language-adjusted procedures during the data collection were negatively related to reporting significant differences in the studies.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our review underlined the need for careful design in studies of differences in health care use between immigrant groups and the majority population. The results from studies concerning differences between immigrant and the majority population in primary health care use performed within the US might be interpreted as a reflection of a weaker primary care system in the US compared to Europe and Canada.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/76
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Foets Marleen
Devillé Walter
Uiters Ellen
Spreeuwenberg Peter
Groenewegen Peter P
spellingShingle Foets Marleen
Devillé Walter
Uiters Ellen
Spreeuwenberg Peter
Groenewegen Peter P
Differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in the use of primary medical care; a systematic review
BMC Health Services Research
author_facet Foets Marleen
Devillé Walter
Uiters Ellen
Spreeuwenberg Peter
Groenewegen Peter P
author_sort Foets Marleen
title Differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in the use of primary medical care; a systematic review
title_short Differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in the use of primary medical care; a systematic review
title_full Differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in the use of primary medical care; a systematic review
title_fullStr Differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in the use of primary medical care; a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in the use of primary medical care; a systematic review
title_sort differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in the use of primary medical care; a systematic review
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2009-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Studies on differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in health care utilization vary with respect to the extent and direction of differences in use. Therefore, our study aimed to provide a systematic overview of the existing research on differences in primary care utilization between immigrant groups and the majority population.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>For this review PubMed, PsycInfo, Cinahl, Sociofile, Web of Science and Current Contents were consulted. Study selection and quality assessment was performed using a predefined protocol by 2 reviewers independently of each other. Only original, quantitative, peer-reviewed papers were taken into account. To account for this hierarchical structure, logistic multilevel analyses were performed to examine the extent to which differences are found across countries and immigrant groups. Differences in primary care use were related to study characteristics, strength of the primary care system and methodological quality.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 37 studies from 7 countries met all inclusion criteria. Remarkably, studies performed within the US more often reported a significant lower use among immigrant groups as compared to the majority population than the other countries. As studies scored higher on methodological quality, the likelihood of reporting significant differences increased. Adjustment for health status and use of culture-/language-adjusted procedures during the data collection were negatively related to reporting significant differences in the studies.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our review underlined the need for careful design in studies of differences in health care use between immigrant groups and the majority population. The results from studies concerning differences between immigrant and the majority population in primary health care use performed within the US might be interpreted as a reflection of a weaker primary care system in the US compared to Europe and Canada.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/76
work_keys_str_mv AT foetsmarleen differencesbetweenimmigrantandnonimmigrantgroupsintheuseofprimarymedicalcareasystematicreview
AT devillewalter differencesbetweenimmigrantandnonimmigrantgroupsintheuseofprimarymedicalcareasystematicreview
AT uitersellen differencesbetweenimmigrantandnonimmigrantgroupsintheuseofprimarymedicalcareasystematicreview
AT spreeuwenbergpeter differencesbetweenimmigrantandnonimmigrantgroupsintheuseofprimarymedicalcareasystematicreview
AT groenewegenpeterp differencesbetweenimmigrantandnonimmigrantgroupsintheuseofprimarymedicalcareasystematicreview
_version_ 1724985606078988288