The quantification of risk and tourism

Tourism in South Africa comprises 9.5% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), but remains an underresearched industry, especially regarding the quantification of the risks prevailing in the social, political and economic environment in which the industry operates. Risk prediction, extrapolation f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Piet Croucamp, Colene Hind
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AfricaJournals 2014-01-01
Series:African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure
Subjects:
Online Access: http://www.ajhtl.com/uploads/7/1/6/3/7163688/article_54_vol_3_2_2014.pdf
id doaj-d216521bcad64a529dc24684a34c6775
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d216521bcad64a529dc24684a34c67752020-11-24T23:24:36ZengAfricaJournalsAfrican Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure2223-814X2014-01-0132article_54_vol_3_2_2014The quantification of risk and tourismPiet Croucamp0Colene Hind1 University of Johannesburg University of South Africa Graduate School of Business Leadership Tourism in South Africa comprises 9.5% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), but remains an underresearched industry, especially regarding the quantification of the risks prevailing in the social, political and economic environment in which the industry operates. Risk prediction, extrapolation forecasting is conducted largely in the context of a qualitative methodology. This article reflects on the quantification of social constructs as variables of risk in the tourism industry with reference to South Africa. The theory and methodology of quantification is briefly reviewed and the indicators of risk are conceptualized and operationalized. The identified indicators are scaled in indices for purposes of quantification. Risk assessments and the quantification of constructs rely heavily on the experience - often personal - of the researcher and this scholarly endeavour is, therefore, not inclusive of all possible identified indicators of risk. It is accepted that tourism in South Africa is an industry comprising of a large diversity of sectors, each with a different set of risk indicators and risk profiles. The emphasis of this article is thus on the methodology to be applied to a risk profile. A secondary endeavour is to provide for clarity about the conceptual and operational confines of risk in general, as well as how quantified risk relates to the tourism industry. The indices provided include both domesticand international risk indicators. The motivation for the article is to encourage a greater emphasis on quantitative research in our efforts to understand and manage a risk profile for the tourist industry. http://www.ajhtl.com/uploads/7/1/6/3/7163688/article_54_vol_3_2_2014.pdf tourism risk South Africa economic indicators
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Piet Croucamp
Colene Hind
spellingShingle Piet Croucamp
Colene Hind
The quantification of risk and tourism
African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure
tourism
risk
South Africa
economic indicators
author_facet Piet Croucamp
Colene Hind
author_sort Piet Croucamp
title The quantification of risk and tourism
title_short The quantification of risk and tourism
title_full The quantification of risk and tourism
title_fullStr The quantification of risk and tourism
title_full_unstemmed The quantification of risk and tourism
title_sort quantification of risk and tourism
publisher AfricaJournals
series African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure
issn 2223-814X
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Tourism in South Africa comprises 9.5% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), but remains an underresearched industry, especially regarding the quantification of the risks prevailing in the social, political and economic environment in which the industry operates. Risk prediction, extrapolation forecasting is conducted largely in the context of a qualitative methodology. This article reflects on the quantification of social constructs as variables of risk in the tourism industry with reference to South Africa. The theory and methodology of quantification is briefly reviewed and the indicators of risk are conceptualized and operationalized. The identified indicators are scaled in indices for purposes of quantification. Risk assessments and the quantification of constructs rely heavily on the experience - often personal - of the researcher and this scholarly endeavour is, therefore, not inclusive of all possible identified indicators of risk. It is accepted that tourism in South Africa is an industry comprising of a large diversity of sectors, each with a different set of risk indicators and risk profiles. The emphasis of this article is thus on the methodology to be applied to a risk profile. A secondary endeavour is to provide for clarity about the conceptual and operational confines of risk in general, as well as how quantified risk relates to the tourism industry. The indices provided include both domesticand international risk indicators. The motivation for the article is to encourage a greater emphasis on quantitative research in our efforts to understand and manage a risk profile for the tourist industry.
topic tourism
risk
South Africa
economic indicators
url http://www.ajhtl.com/uploads/7/1/6/3/7163688/article_54_vol_3_2_2014.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pietcroucamp thequantificationofriskandtourism
AT colenehind thequantificationofriskandtourism
AT pietcroucamp quantificationofriskandtourism
AT colenehind quantificationofriskandtourism
_version_ 1725559845257478144