Comparison between results of dynamic & static moduli of soil determined by different methods

A comprehensive study was carried out to investigate static and dynamic soil properties for a high rise building in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. A total of 21 boreholes were drilled to a maximum depth of 100 m including the performance of Standard Penetration Tests and core measurements for rock formations...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A.H. Hammam, M. Eliwa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2013-08-01
Series:HBRC Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687404813000266
id doaj-d21fbfe132aa46fb8e2f71e7680f7272
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d21fbfe132aa46fb8e2f71e7680f72722020-11-25T00:45:40ZengTaylor & Francis GroupHBRC Journal1687-40482013-08-019214414910.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.05.002Comparison between results of dynamic & static moduli of soil determined by different methodsA.H. Hammam0M. Eliwa1Housing and Building National Research Center, Cairo, EgyptAl-Jazzar Consulting Engineers, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaA comprehensive study was carried out to investigate static and dynamic soil properties for a high rise building in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. A total of 21 boreholes were drilled to a maximum depth of 100 m including the performance of Standard Penetration Tests and core measurements for rock formations. Pressure-meter tests were performed to determine Young, ES and shear, G moduli while shear wave velocity were measured through cross-hole method. The dynamic shear modulus Gmax and Poisson’s Ratio (υ) could be estimated directly through relations with shear wave velocity. Three boreholes at three locations were prepared during drilling for carrying out pressure-meter tests every 5.0 m from ground surface down to 60.0 m. Other two locations at the site were chosen to perform cross-hole tests. These tests were performed from ground surface down to 55.0 m at intervals of 1.50 m. A comprehensive comparison was established between the results of Young and shear moduli determined from pressure-meter, cross-hole and S.P.T. It was observed that the values of ES and G determined via pressure-meter are much less than those of Ei and Gmax determined via cross-hole tests. It was also observed that the results of shear wave velocity, estimated via S.P.T correlations, have a wide range but are in fair agreement with the results of cross-hole tests.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687404813000266Shear wave velocityDynamic shear modulusCross-holePressure-meter
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A.H. Hammam
M. Eliwa
spellingShingle A.H. Hammam
M. Eliwa
Comparison between results of dynamic & static moduli of soil determined by different methods
HBRC Journal
Shear wave velocity
Dynamic shear modulus
Cross-hole
Pressure-meter
author_facet A.H. Hammam
M. Eliwa
author_sort A.H. Hammam
title Comparison between results of dynamic & static moduli of soil determined by different methods
title_short Comparison between results of dynamic & static moduli of soil determined by different methods
title_full Comparison between results of dynamic & static moduli of soil determined by different methods
title_fullStr Comparison between results of dynamic & static moduli of soil determined by different methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between results of dynamic & static moduli of soil determined by different methods
title_sort comparison between results of dynamic & static moduli of soil determined by different methods
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series HBRC Journal
issn 1687-4048
publishDate 2013-08-01
description A comprehensive study was carried out to investigate static and dynamic soil properties for a high rise building in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. A total of 21 boreholes were drilled to a maximum depth of 100 m including the performance of Standard Penetration Tests and core measurements for rock formations. Pressure-meter tests were performed to determine Young, ES and shear, G moduli while shear wave velocity were measured through cross-hole method. The dynamic shear modulus Gmax and Poisson’s Ratio (υ) could be estimated directly through relations with shear wave velocity. Three boreholes at three locations were prepared during drilling for carrying out pressure-meter tests every 5.0 m from ground surface down to 60.0 m. Other two locations at the site were chosen to perform cross-hole tests. These tests were performed from ground surface down to 55.0 m at intervals of 1.50 m. A comprehensive comparison was established between the results of Young and shear moduli determined from pressure-meter, cross-hole and S.P.T. It was observed that the values of ES and G determined via pressure-meter are much less than those of Ei and Gmax determined via cross-hole tests. It was also observed that the results of shear wave velocity, estimated via S.P.T correlations, have a wide range but are in fair agreement with the results of cross-hole tests.
topic Shear wave velocity
Dynamic shear modulus
Cross-hole
Pressure-meter
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687404813000266
work_keys_str_mv AT ahhammam comparisonbetweenresultsofdynamicstaticmoduliofsoildeterminedbydifferentmethods
AT meliwa comparisonbetweenresultsofdynamicstaticmoduliofsoildeterminedbydifferentmethods
_version_ 1725268786691440640