The Possible Role of Staphylococcus epidermidis LPxTG Surface Protein SesC in Biofilm Formation.

Staphylococcus epidermidis is the most common cause of device-associated infections. It has been shown that active and passive immunization in an animal model against protein SesC significantly reduces S. epidermidis biofilm-associated infections. In order to elucidate its role, knock-out of sesC or...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laleh Khodaparast, Ladan Khodaparast, Mohammad Shahrooei, Benoit Stijlemans, Rita Merckx, Pieter Baatsen, James P O'Gara, Elaine Waters, Lieve Van Mellaert, Johan Van Eldere
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4723045?pdf=render
id doaj-d2467d0a15da4504ac545b329ff7b19f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d2467d0a15da4504ac545b329ff7b19f2020-11-25T01:52:31ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01111e014670410.1371/journal.pone.0146704The Possible Role of Staphylococcus epidermidis LPxTG Surface Protein SesC in Biofilm Formation.Laleh KhodaparastLadan KhodaparastMohammad ShahrooeiBenoit StijlemansRita MerckxPieter BaatsenJames P O'GaraElaine WatersLieve Van MellaertJohan Van EldereStaphylococcus epidermidis is the most common cause of device-associated infections. It has been shown that active and passive immunization in an animal model against protein SesC significantly reduces S. epidermidis biofilm-associated infections. In order to elucidate its role, knock-out of sesC or isolation of S. epidermidis sesC-negative mutants were attempted, however, without success. As an alternative strategy, sesC was introduced into Staphylococcus aureus 8325-4 and its isogenic icaADBC and srtA mutants, into the clinical methicillin-sensitive S. aureus isolate MSSA4 and the MRSA S. aureus isolate BH1CC, which all lack sesC. Transformation of these strains with sesC i) changed the biofilm phenotype of strains 8325-4 and MSSA4 from PIA-dependent to proteinaceous even though PIA synthesis was not affected, ii) converted the non-biofilm-forming strain 8325-4 ica::tet to a proteinaceous biofilm-forming strain, iii) impaired PIA-dependent biofilm formation by 8325-4 srtA::tet, iv) had no impact on protein-mediated biofilm formation of BH1CC and v) increased in vivo catheter and organ colonization by strain 8325-4. Furthermore, treatment with anti-SesC antibodies significantly reduced in vitro biofilm formation and in vivo colonization by these transformants expressing sesC. These findings strongly suggest that SesC is involved in S. epidermidis attachment to and subsequent biofilm formation on a substrate.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4723045?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laleh Khodaparast
Ladan Khodaparast
Mohammad Shahrooei
Benoit Stijlemans
Rita Merckx
Pieter Baatsen
James P O'Gara
Elaine Waters
Lieve Van Mellaert
Johan Van Eldere
spellingShingle Laleh Khodaparast
Ladan Khodaparast
Mohammad Shahrooei
Benoit Stijlemans
Rita Merckx
Pieter Baatsen
James P O'Gara
Elaine Waters
Lieve Van Mellaert
Johan Van Eldere
The Possible Role of Staphylococcus epidermidis LPxTG Surface Protein SesC in Biofilm Formation.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Laleh Khodaparast
Ladan Khodaparast
Mohammad Shahrooei
Benoit Stijlemans
Rita Merckx
Pieter Baatsen
James P O'Gara
Elaine Waters
Lieve Van Mellaert
Johan Van Eldere
author_sort Laleh Khodaparast
title The Possible Role of Staphylococcus epidermidis LPxTG Surface Protein SesC in Biofilm Formation.
title_short The Possible Role of Staphylococcus epidermidis LPxTG Surface Protein SesC in Biofilm Formation.
title_full The Possible Role of Staphylococcus epidermidis LPxTG Surface Protein SesC in Biofilm Formation.
title_fullStr The Possible Role of Staphylococcus epidermidis LPxTG Surface Protein SesC in Biofilm Formation.
title_full_unstemmed The Possible Role of Staphylococcus epidermidis LPxTG Surface Protein SesC in Biofilm Formation.
title_sort possible role of staphylococcus epidermidis lpxtg surface protein sesc in biofilm formation.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Staphylococcus epidermidis is the most common cause of device-associated infections. It has been shown that active and passive immunization in an animal model against protein SesC significantly reduces S. epidermidis biofilm-associated infections. In order to elucidate its role, knock-out of sesC or isolation of S. epidermidis sesC-negative mutants were attempted, however, without success. As an alternative strategy, sesC was introduced into Staphylococcus aureus 8325-4 and its isogenic icaADBC and srtA mutants, into the clinical methicillin-sensitive S. aureus isolate MSSA4 and the MRSA S. aureus isolate BH1CC, which all lack sesC. Transformation of these strains with sesC i) changed the biofilm phenotype of strains 8325-4 and MSSA4 from PIA-dependent to proteinaceous even though PIA synthesis was not affected, ii) converted the non-biofilm-forming strain 8325-4 ica::tet to a proteinaceous biofilm-forming strain, iii) impaired PIA-dependent biofilm formation by 8325-4 srtA::tet, iv) had no impact on protein-mediated biofilm formation of BH1CC and v) increased in vivo catheter and organ colonization by strain 8325-4. Furthermore, treatment with anti-SesC antibodies significantly reduced in vitro biofilm formation and in vivo colonization by these transformants expressing sesC. These findings strongly suggest that SesC is involved in S. epidermidis attachment to and subsequent biofilm formation on a substrate.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4723045?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT lalehkhodaparast thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT ladankhodaparast thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT mohammadshahrooei thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT benoitstijlemans thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT ritamerckx thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT pieterbaatsen thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT jamespogara thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT elainewaters thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT lievevanmellaert thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT johanvaneldere thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT lalehkhodaparast possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT ladankhodaparast possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT mohammadshahrooei possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT benoitstijlemans possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT ritamerckx possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT pieterbaatsen possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT jamespogara possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT elainewaters possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT lievevanmellaert possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
AT johanvaneldere possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation
_version_ 1724994688028508160