MR-based morphometry of the posterior fossa in fetuses with neural tube defects of the spine.

<h4>Objectives</h4>In cases of "spina bifida," a detailed prenatal imaging assessment of the exact morphology of neural tube defects (NTD) is often limited. Due to the diverse clinical prognosis and prenatal treatment options, imaging parameters that support the prenatal differ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ramona Woitek, Anton Dvorak, Michael Weber, Rainer Seidl, Dieter Bettelheim, Veronika Schöpf, Gabriele Amann, Peter C Brugger, Julia Furtner, Ulrika Asenbaum, Daniela Prayer, Gregor Kasprian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112585
id doaj-d24b1ac7c4784d1283e5b167a4f1e94a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d24b1ac7c4784d1283e5b167a4f1e94a2021-03-04T08:47:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01911e11258510.1371/journal.pone.0112585MR-based morphometry of the posterior fossa in fetuses with neural tube defects of the spine.Ramona WoitekAnton DvorakMichael WeberRainer SeidlDieter BettelheimVeronika SchöpfGabriele AmannPeter C BruggerJulia FurtnerUlrika AsenbaumDaniela PrayerGregor Kasprian<h4>Objectives</h4>In cases of "spina bifida," a detailed prenatal imaging assessment of the exact morphology of neural tube defects (NTD) is often limited. Due to the diverse clinical prognosis and prenatal treatment options, imaging parameters that support the prenatal differentiation between open and closed neural tube defects (ONTDs and CNTDs) are required. This fetal MR study aims to evaluate the clivus-supraocciput angle (CSA) and the maximum transverse diameter of the posterior fossa (TDPF) as morphometric parameters to aid in the reliable diagnosis of either ONTDs or CNTDs.<h4>Methods</h4>The TDPF and the CSA of 238 fetuses (20-37 GW, mean: 28.36 GW) with a normal central nervous system, 44 with ONTDS, and 13 with CNTDs (18-37 GW, mean: 24.3 GW) were retrospectively measured using T2-weighted 1.5 Tesla MR -sequences.<h4>Results</h4>Normal fetuses showed a significant increase in the TDPF (r = .956; p<.001) and CSA (r = .714; p<.001) with gestational age. In ONTDs the CSA was significantly smaller (p<.001) than in normal controls and CNTDs, whereas in CNTDs the CSA was not significantly smaller than in controls (p = .160). In both ONTDs and in CNTDs the TDPF was significantly different from controls (p<.001).<h4>Conclusions</h4>The skull base morphology in fetuses with ONTDs differs significantly from cases with CNTDs and normal controls. This is the first study to show that the CSA changes during gestation and that it is a reliable imaging biomarker to distinguish between ONTDs and CNTDs, independent of the morphology of the spinal defect.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112585
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ramona Woitek
Anton Dvorak
Michael Weber
Rainer Seidl
Dieter Bettelheim
Veronika Schöpf
Gabriele Amann
Peter C Brugger
Julia Furtner
Ulrika Asenbaum
Daniela Prayer
Gregor Kasprian
spellingShingle Ramona Woitek
Anton Dvorak
Michael Weber
Rainer Seidl
Dieter Bettelheim
Veronika Schöpf
Gabriele Amann
Peter C Brugger
Julia Furtner
Ulrika Asenbaum
Daniela Prayer
Gregor Kasprian
MR-based morphometry of the posterior fossa in fetuses with neural tube defects of the spine.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ramona Woitek
Anton Dvorak
Michael Weber
Rainer Seidl
Dieter Bettelheim
Veronika Schöpf
Gabriele Amann
Peter C Brugger
Julia Furtner
Ulrika Asenbaum
Daniela Prayer
Gregor Kasprian
author_sort Ramona Woitek
title MR-based morphometry of the posterior fossa in fetuses with neural tube defects of the spine.
title_short MR-based morphometry of the posterior fossa in fetuses with neural tube defects of the spine.
title_full MR-based morphometry of the posterior fossa in fetuses with neural tube defects of the spine.
title_fullStr MR-based morphometry of the posterior fossa in fetuses with neural tube defects of the spine.
title_full_unstemmed MR-based morphometry of the posterior fossa in fetuses with neural tube defects of the spine.
title_sort mr-based morphometry of the posterior fossa in fetuses with neural tube defects of the spine.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description <h4>Objectives</h4>In cases of "spina bifida," a detailed prenatal imaging assessment of the exact morphology of neural tube defects (NTD) is often limited. Due to the diverse clinical prognosis and prenatal treatment options, imaging parameters that support the prenatal differentiation between open and closed neural tube defects (ONTDs and CNTDs) are required. This fetal MR study aims to evaluate the clivus-supraocciput angle (CSA) and the maximum transverse diameter of the posterior fossa (TDPF) as morphometric parameters to aid in the reliable diagnosis of either ONTDs or CNTDs.<h4>Methods</h4>The TDPF and the CSA of 238 fetuses (20-37 GW, mean: 28.36 GW) with a normal central nervous system, 44 with ONTDS, and 13 with CNTDs (18-37 GW, mean: 24.3 GW) were retrospectively measured using T2-weighted 1.5 Tesla MR -sequences.<h4>Results</h4>Normal fetuses showed a significant increase in the TDPF (r = .956; p<.001) and CSA (r = .714; p<.001) with gestational age. In ONTDs the CSA was significantly smaller (p<.001) than in normal controls and CNTDs, whereas in CNTDs the CSA was not significantly smaller than in controls (p = .160). In both ONTDs and in CNTDs the TDPF was significantly different from controls (p<.001).<h4>Conclusions</h4>The skull base morphology in fetuses with ONTDs differs significantly from cases with CNTDs and normal controls. This is the first study to show that the CSA changes during gestation and that it is a reliable imaging biomarker to distinguish between ONTDs and CNTDs, independent of the morphology of the spinal defect.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112585
work_keys_str_mv AT ramonawoitek mrbasedmorphometryoftheposteriorfossainfetuseswithneuraltubedefectsofthespine
AT antondvorak mrbasedmorphometryoftheposteriorfossainfetuseswithneuraltubedefectsofthespine
AT michaelweber mrbasedmorphometryoftheposteriorfossainfetuseswithneuraltubedefectsofthespine
AT rainerseidl mrbasedmorphometryoftheposteriorfossainfetuseswithneuraltubedefectsofthespine
AT dieterbettelheim mrbasedmorphometryoftheposteriorfossainfetuseswithneuraltubedefectsofthespine
AT veronikaschopf mrbasedmorphometryoftheposteriorfossainfetuseswithneuraltubedefectsofthespine
AT gabrieleamann mrbasedmorphometryoftheposteriorfossainfetuseswithneuraltubedefectsofthespine
AT petercbrugger mrbasedmorphometryoftheposteriorfossainfetuseswithneuraltubedefectsofthespine
AT juliafurtner mrbasedmorphometryoftheposteriorfossainfetuseswithneuraltubedefectsofthespine
AT ulrikaasenbaum mrbasedmorphometryoftheposteriorfossainfetuseswithneuraltubedefectsofthespine
AT danielaprayer mrbasedmorphometryoftheposteriorfossainfetuseswithneuraltubedefectsofthespine
AT gregorkasprian mrbasedmorphometryoftheposteriorfossainfetuseswithneuraltubedefectsofthespine
_version_ 1714807720901607424