Benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; A multicriteria decision analysis.

Warfarin and new oral anticoagulants are effective in reducing stroke in atrial fibrillation; however, the benefits and risks rates in clinical trials show heterogeneity for each anticoagulant, and is unknown the cost influence on a model considering most of the treatment consequences. We designed a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jose Mendoza-Sanchez, Federico Silva, Lady Rangel, Linda Jaramillo, Leidy Mendoza, Jenny Garzon, Andrea Quiroga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5933763?pdf=render
id doaj-d251c4e36bd5432691b45055b83936a9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d251c4e36bd5432691b45055b83936a92020-11-24T22:06:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01135e019636110.1371/journal.pone.0196361Benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; A multicriteria decision analysis.Jose Mendoza-SanchezFederico SilvaLady RangelLinda JaramilloLeidy MendozaJenny GarzonAndrea QuirogaWarfarin and new oral anticoagulants are effective in reducing stroke in atrial fibrillation; however, the benefits and risks rates in clinical trials show heterogeneity for each anticoagulant, and is unknown the cost influence on a model considering most of the treatment consequences. We designed a benefit-risk and cost assessment of oral anticoagulants.We followed the roadmap proposed by IMI-PROTECT and the considerations of emerged good practice to perform Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). The roadmap defines the following steps: (1) planning, (2) evidence gathering and data preparation, (3) analyses, (4) explorations, and (5) conclusions. We defined two reference points (0-100) to allocate numerical values for scores and weights, and used an analogue numeric scale to assess physicians' preferences. As benefits of the anticoagulant therapy, we included reductions in stroke and all-cause mortality; intracranial haemorrhage, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, minor bleeding and myocardial infarction were considered risks. We also made an estimation of the annual drug cost per person.The scores were: Apixaban 33, Dabigatrán 25, warfarin 18 and Rivaroxaban 14 this score reveals the most preferred up to the less preferred option, considering the benefit-risk ratio and drug costs altogether. The relative model weights were: 51.1% for risks, 40.4% for benefits and 8.5% for cost. The sensitivity analysis confirms the model robustness.From this analysis, apixaban should be considered as the preferred anticoagulant option -due to a better benefit-risk balance and a minor cost influence- followed by dabigatran, warfarin and rivaroxaban.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5933763?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jose Mendoza-Sanchez
Federico Silva
Lady Rangel
Linda Jaramillo
Leidy Mendoza
Jenny Garzon
Andrea Quiroga
spellingShingle Jose Mendoza-Sanchez
Federico Silva
Lady Rangel
Linda Jaramillo
Leidy Mendoza
Jenny Garzon
Andrea Quiroga
Benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; A multicriteria decision analysis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jose Mendoza-Sanchez
Federico Silva
Lady Rangel
Linda Jaramillo
Leidy Mendoza
Jenny Garzon
Andrea Quiroga
author_sort Jose Mendoza-Sanchez
title Benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; A multicriteria decision analysis.
title_short Benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; A multicriteria decision analysis.
title_full Benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; A multicriteria decision analysis.
title_fullStr Benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; A multicriteria decision analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; A multicriteria decision analysis.
title_sort benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; a multicriteria decision analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Warfarin and new oral anticoagulants are effective in reducing stroke in atrial fibrillation; however, the benefits and risks rates in clinical trials show heterogeneity for each anticoagulant, and is unknown the cost influence on a model considering most of the treatment consequences. We designed a benefit-risk and cost assessment of oral anticoagulants.We followed the roadmap proposed by IMI-PROTECT and the considerations of emerged good practice to perform Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). The roadmap defines the following steps: (1) planning, (2) evidence gathering and data preparation, (3) analyses, (4) explorations, and (5) conclusions. We defined two reference points (0-100) to allocate numerical values for scores and weights, and used an analogue numeric scale to assess physicians' preferences. As benefits of the anticoagulant therapy, we included reductions in stroke and all-cause mortality; intracranial haemorrhage, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, minor bleeding and myocardial infarction were considered risks. We also made an estimation of the annual drug cost per person.The scores were: Apixaban 33, Dabigatrán 25, warfarin 18 and Rivaroxaban 14 this score reveals the most preferred up to the less preferred option, considering the benefit-risk ratio and drug costs altogether. The relative model weights were: 51.1% for risks, 40.4% for benefits and 8.5% for cost. The sensitivity analysis confirms the model robustness.From this analysis, apixaban should be considered as the preferred anticoagulant option -due to a better benefit-risk balance and a minor cost influence- followed by dabigatran, warfarin and rivaroxaban.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5933763?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT josemendozasanchez benefitriskandcostofneworalanticoagulantsandwarfarininatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT federicosilva benefitriskandcostofneworalanticoagulantsandwarfarininatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT ladyrangel benefitriskandcostofneworalanticoagulantsandwarfarininatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT lindajaramillo benefitriskandcostofneworalanticoagulantsandwarfarininatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT leidymendoza benefitriskandcostofneworalanticoagulantsandwarfarininatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT jennygarzon benefitriskandcostofneworalanticoagulantsandwarfarininatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT andreaquiroga benefitriskandcostofneworalanticoagulantsandwarfarininatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis
_version_ 1725822864974675968