Benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; A multicriteria decision analysis.
Warfarin and new oral anticoagulants are effective in reducing stroke in atrial fibrillation; however, the benefits and risks rates in clinical trials show heterogeneity for each anticoagulant, and is unknown the cost influence on a model considering most of the treatment consequences. We designed a...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5933763?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-d251c4e36bd5432691b45055b83936a9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d251c4e36bd5432691b45055b83936a92020-11-24T22:06:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01135e019636110.1371/journal.pone.0196361Benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; A multicriteria decision analysis.Jose Mendoza-SanchezFederico SilvaLady RangelLinda JaramilloLeidy MendozaJenny GarzonAndrea QuirogaWarfarin and new oral anticoagulants are effective in reducing stroke in atrial fibrillation; however, the benefits and risks rates in clinical trials show heterogeneity for each anticoagulant, and is unknown the cost influence on a model considering most of the treatment consequences. We designed a benefit-risk and cost assessment of oral anticoagulants.We followed the roadmap proposed by IMI-PROTECT and the considerations of emerged good practice to perform Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). The roadmap defines the following steps: (1) planning, (2) evidence gathering and data preparation, (3) analyses, (4) explorations, and (5) conclusions. We defined two reference points (0-100) to allocate numerical values for scores and weights, and used an analogue numeric scale to assess physicians' preferences. As benefits of the anticoagulant therapy, we included reductions in stroke and all-cause mortality; intracranial haemorrhage, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, minor bleeding and myocardial infarction were considered risks. We also made an estimation of the annual drug cost per person.The scores were: Apixaban 33, Dabigatrán 25, warfarin 18 and Rivaroxaban 14 this score reveals the most preferred up to the less preferred option, considering the benefit-risk ratio and drug costs altogether. The relative model weights were: 51.1% for risks, 40.4% for benefits and 8.5% for cost. The sensitivity analysis confirms the model robustness.From this analysis, apixaban should be considered as the preferred anticoagulant option -due to a better benefit-risk balance and a minor cost influence- followed by dabigatran, warfarin and rivaroxaban.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5933763?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jose Mendoza-Sanchez Federico Silva Lady Rangel Linda Jaramillo Leidy Mendoza Jenny Garzon Andrea Quiroga |
spellingShingle |
Jose Mendoza-Sanchez Federico Silva Lady Rangel Linda Jaramillo Leidy Mendoza Jenny Garzon Andrea Quiroga Benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; A multicriteria decision analysis. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Jose Mendoza-Sanchez Federico Silva Lady Rangel Linda Jaramillo Leidy Mendoza Jenny Garzon Andrea Quiroga |
author_sort |
Jose Mendoza-Sanchez |
title |
Benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; A multicriteria decision analysis. |
title_short |
Benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; A multicriteria decision analysis. |
title_full |
Benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; A multicriteria decision analysis. |
title_fullStr |
Benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; A multicriteria decision analysis. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; A multicriteria decision analysis. |
title_sort |
benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; a multicriteria decision analysis. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Warfarin and new oral anticoagulants are effective in reducing stroke in atrial fibrillation; however, the benefits and risks rates in clinical trials show heterogeneity for each anticoagulant, and is unknown the cost influence on a model considering most of the treatment consequences. We designed a benefit-risk and cost assessment of oral anticoagulants.We followed the roadmap proposed by IMI-PROTECT and the considerations of emerged good practice to perform Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). The roadmap defines the following steps: (1) planning, (2) evidence gathering and data preparation, (3) analyses, (4) explorations, and (5) conclusions. We defined two reference points (0-100) to allocate numerical values for scores and weights, and used an analogue numeric scale to assess physicians' preferences. As benefits of the anticoagulant therapy, we included reductions in stroke and all-cause mortality; intracranial haemorrhage, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, minor bleeding and myocardial infarction were considered risks. We also made an estimation of the annual drug cost per person.The scores were: Apixaban 33, Dabigatrán 25, warfarin 18 and Rivaroxaban 14 this score reveals the most preferred up to the less preferred option, considering the benefit-risk ratio and drug costs altogether. The relative model weights were: 51.1% for risks, 40.4% for benefits and 8.5% for cost. The sensitivity analysis confirms the model robustness.From this analysis, apixaban should be considered as the preferred anticoagulant option -due to a better benefit-risk balance and a minor cost influence- followed by dabigatran, warfarin and rivaroxaban. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5933763?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT josemendozasanchez benefitriskandcostofneworalanticoagulantsandwarfarininatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT federicosilva benefitriskandcostofneworalanticoagulantsandwarfarininatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT ladyrangel benefitriskandcostofneworalanticoagulantsandwarfarininatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT lindajaramillo benefitriskandcostofneworalanticoagulantsandwarfarininatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT leidymendoza benefitriskandcostofneworalanticoagulantsandwarfarininatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT jennygarzon benefitriskandcostofneworalanticoagulantsandwarfarininatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis AT andreaquiroga benefitriskandcostofneworalanticoagulantsandwarfarininatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis |
_version_ |
1725822864974675968 |