Economic Impact Assessment of Regulatory Changes: A Case Study of a Proposed New ICAO Standard for Contaminated Runways

The literature on economic impact assessments (EIA) of regulatory changes in the transport sector is scarce. This study examines how a change in the regulatory framework for air transport could affect transport costs. The case in question is the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) State...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Svein Bråthen, Karoline L. Hoff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/5897
id doaj-d289257fccbd47a0934eca93765da12b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d289257fccbd47a0934eca93765da12b2020-11-25T03:02:22ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-07-01125897589710.3390/su12155897Economic Impact Assessment of Regulatory Changes: A Case Study of a Proposed New ICAO Standard for Contaminated RunwaysSvein Bråthen0Karoline L. Hoff1Faculty of Logistics, Molde University College, Specialized University in Logistics and Department for Transport Economics, Möre Research Institute, 6402 Molde, NorwayFaculty of Logistics, Molde University College, Specialized University in Logistics and Department for Transport Economics, Möre Research Institute, 6402 Molde, NorwayThe literature on economic impact assessments (EIA) of regulatory changes in the transport sector is scarce. This study examines how a change in the regulatory framework for air transport could affect transport costs. The case in question is the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) State letter AN 4/1.2.26-16/19 that proposed to set a higher minimum friction on runways operated during slippery conditions. This may affect operations, particularly in the northern hemisphere. Four Norwegian airports that operate under severe winter conditions are used as examples. Sudden cancellations or transfers to another airport give additional costs per passenger, ranging from NOK 750 to NOK 5600 per return flight. If these results are generalized to all affected flights in Norway, the annual estimate is NOK 400–450 million. These numbers may not seem exorbitant. However, the costs are mainly borne by a limited number of airports. Some of them may have to close during winter, with severe consequences for local communities. This study illustrates how effects of a proposed regulatory change may be assessed in order to aid the decision-making process. The impacts on aviation safety are not considered. Data on aircraft accidents in Norway do not indicate significant effects from the proposed regulatory change.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/5897aviationeconomic impact assessmentcost benefit analysisregulatory changesrunways
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Svein Bråthen
Karoline L. Hoff
spellingShingle Svein Bråthen
Karoline L. Hoff
Economic Impact Assessment of Regulatory Changes: A Case Study of a Proposed New ICAO Standard for Contaminated Runways
Sustainability
aviation
economic impact assessment
cost benefit analysis
regulatory changes
runways
author_facet Svein Bråthen
Karoline L. Hoff
author_sort Svein Bråthen
title Economic Impact Assessment of Regulatory Changes: A Case Study of a Proposed New ICAO Standard for Contaminated Runways
title_short Economic Impact Assessment of Regulatory Changes: A Case Study of a Proposed New ICAO Standard for Contaminated Runways
title_full Economic Impact Assessment of Regulatory Changes: A Case Study of a Proposed New ICAO Standard for Contaminated Runways
title_fullStr Economic Impact Assessment of Regulatory Changes: A Case Study of a Proposed New ICAO Standard for Contaminated Runways
title_full_unstemmed Economic Impact Assessment of Regulatory Changes: A Case Study of a Proposed New ICAO Standard for Contaminated Runways
title_sort economic impact assessment of regulatory changes: a case study of a proposed new icao standard for contaminated runways
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-07-01
description The literature on economic impact assessments (EIA) of regulatory changes in the transport sector is scarce. This study examines how a change in the regulatory framework for air transport could affect transport costs. The case in question is the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) State letter AN 4/1.2.26-16/19 that proposed to set a higher minimum friction on runways operated during slippery conditions. This may affect operations, particularly in the northern hemisphere. Four Norwegian airports that operate under severe winter conditions are used as examples. Sudden cancellations or transfers to another airport give additional costs per passenger, ranging from NOK 750 to NOK 5600 per return flight. If these results are generalized to all affected flights in Norway, the annual estimate is NOK 400–450 million. These numbers may not seem exorbitant. However, the costs are mainly borne by a limited number of airports. Some of them may have to close during winter, with severe consequences for local communities. This study illustrates how effects of a proposed regulatory change may be assessed in order to aid the decision-making process. The impacts on aviation safety are not considered. Data on aircraft accidents in Norway do not indicate significant effects from the proposed regulatory change.
topic aviation
economic impact assessment
cost benefit analysis
regulatory changes
runways
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/5897
work_keys_str_mv AT sveinbrathen economicimpactassessmentofregulatorychangesacasestudyofaproposednewicaostandardforcontaminatedrunways
AT karolinelhoff economicimpactassessmentofregulatorychangesacasestudyofaproposednewicaostandardforcontaminatedrunways
_version_ 1724689890220703744