A comparative evaluation of epidural and general anaesthetic technique for renal surgeries: A randomised prospective study

Background and Aims: Neuraxial anaesthesia has become popular for the renal surgeries during the last few years. This study was aimed at comparing general anaesthesia (GA) with epidural anaesthesia in patients undergoing renal surgeries. Methods: One hundred American Society of Anaesthesiologists (A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa, Jasleen Kaur, Amarjit Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2014;volume=58;issue=4;spage=410;epage=415;aulast=Bajwa
id doaj-d289caf3153444bbbc5674c833e1fd35
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d289caf3153444bbbc5674c833e1fd352020-11-24T23:40:57ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Anaesthesia0019-50492014-01-0158441041510.4103/0019-5049.138975A comparative evaluation of epidural and general anaesthetic technique for renal surgeries: A randomised prospective studySukhminder Jit Singh BajwaJasleen KaurAmarjit SinghBackground and Aims: Neuraxial anaesthesia has become popular for the renal surgeries during the last few years. This study was aimed at comparing general anaesthesia (GA) with epidural anaesthesia in patients undergoing renal surgeries. Methods: One hundred American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status-I and II adult consenting patients of both gender in the age group of 25-55 years undergoing renal surgeries were randomly assigned to two groups of 50 patients each: Group G and Group E. Group G patients were administered conventional GA while Group E received epidural anaesthesia (EA) with 3 mg/kg of ropivacaine and 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine. Besides cardio-respiratory parameters, surgeon′s satisfaction, patient′s satisfaction and side effects were observed. Parametric data were analysed by ANOVA while non-parametric data were compared with Mann-Whitney U-test and Wilcoxon test. Value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The demographic profile, total anaesthesia time, surgical time and haemodynamic parameters and surgeon′s satisfaction scores were comparable in both groups. Patient′s satisfaction scores were better in Group E during the post-operative period. Incidence of side-effects such as nausea and vomiting and shivering were higher in Group G (P < 0.001) while the incidence of dry mouth was higher in Group E (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Epidural anaesthesia with ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine can be safely and effectively used in patients undergoing renal surgeries.http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2014;volume=58;issue=4;spage=410;epage=415;aulast=BajwaDexmedetomidineepiduralgeneral anaesthesiarenal surgeryropivacaine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa
Jasleen Kaur
Amarjit Singh
spellingShingle Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa
Jasleen Kaur
Amarjit Singh
A comparative evaluation of epidural and general anaesthetic technique for renal surgeries: A randomised prospective study
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Dexmedetomidine
epidural
general anaesthesia
renal surgery
ropivacaine
author_facet Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa
Jasleen Kaur
Amarjit Singh
author_sort Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa
title A comparative evaluation of epidural and general anaesthetic technique for renal surgeries: A randomised prospective study
title_short A comparative evaluation of epidural and general anaesthetic technique for renal surgeries: A randomised prospective study
title_full A comparative evaluation of epidural and general anaesthetic technique for renal surgeries: A randomised prospective study
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of epidural and general anaesthetic technique for renal surgeries: A randomised prospective study
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of epidural and general anaesthetic technique for renal surgeries: A randomised prospective study
title_sort comparative evaluation of epidural and general anaesthetic technique for renal surgeries: a randomised prospective study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
issn 0019-5049
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Background and Aims: Neuraxial anaesthesia has become popular for the renal surgeries during the last few years. This study was aimed at comparing general anaesthesia (GA) with epidural anaesthesia in patients undergoing renal surgeries. Methods: One hundred American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status-I and II adult consenting patients of both gender in the age group of 25-55 years undergoing renal surgeries were randomly assigned to two groups of 50 patients each: Group G and Group E. Group G patients were administered conventional GA while Group E received epidural anaesthesia (EA) with 3 mg/kg of ropivacaine and 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine. Besides cardio-respiratory parameters, surgeon′s satisfaction, patient′s satisfaction and side effects were observed. Parametric data were analysed by ANOVA while non-parametric data were compared with Mann-Whitney U-test and Wilcoxon test. Value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The demographic profile, total anaesthesia time, surgical time and haemodynamic parameters and surgeon′s satisfaction scores were comparable in both groups. Patient′s satisfaction scores were better in Group E during the post-operative period. Incidence of side-effects such as nausea and vomiting and shivering were higher in Group G (P < 0.001) while the incidence of dry mouth was higher in Group E (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Epidural anaesthesia with ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine can be safely and effectively used in patients undergoing renal surgeries.
topic Dexmedetomidine
epidural
general anaesthesia
renal surgery
ropivacaine
url http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2014;volume=58;issue=4;spage=410;epage=415;aulast=Bajwa
work_keys_str_mv AT sukhminderjitsinghbajwa acomparativeevaluationofepiduralandgeneralanaesthetictechniqueforrenalsurgeriesarandomisedprospectivestudy
AT jasleenkaur acomparativeevaluationofepiduralandgeneralanaesthetictechniqueforrenalsurgeriesarandomisedprospectivestudy
AT amarjitsingh acomparativeevaluationofepiduralandgeneralanaesthetictechniqueforrenalsurgeriesarandomisedprospectivestudy
AT sukhminderjitsinghbajwa comparativeevaluationofepiduralandgeneralanaesthetictechniqueforrenalsurgeriesarandomisedprospectivestudy
AT jasleenkaur comparativeevaluationofepiduralandgeneralanaesthetictechniqueforrenalsurgeriesarandomisedprospectivestudy
AT amarjitsingh comparativeevaluationofepiduralandgeneralanaesthetictechniqueforrenalsurgeriesarandomisedprospectivestudy
_version_ 1725508552298070016