Intramuscular compared to intravenous midazolam for paediatric sedation: A study on cardiopulmonary safety and effectiveness

Background: Sedation in children remains a controversial issue in emergency departments (ED). Midazolam, as a benzodiazepine is widely used for procedural sedation among paediatrics. We compared the effectiveness and safety of two forms of midazolam prescription; intramuscular (IM) and intravenous (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad-Reza Ghane, Hamid-Reza Javadzadeh, Sadrollah Mahmoudi, Bita Najafian, Amin Saburi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:African Journal of Paediatric Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.afrjpaedsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0189-6725;year=2014;volume=11;issue=3;spage=219;epage=224;aulast=Ghane
id doaj-d29a1581d26f429da50a1aa81e43f1f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d29a1581d26f429da50a1aa81e43f1f52020-11-24T22:20:10ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAfrican Journal of Paediatric Surgery0189-67250974-59982014-01-0111321922410.4103/0189-6725.137329Intramuscular compared to intravenous midazolam for paediatric sedation: A study on cardiopulmonary safety and effectivenessMohammad-Reza GhaneHamid-Reza JavadzadehSadrollah MahmoudiBita NajafianAmin SaburiBackground: Sedation in children remains a controversial issue in emergency departments (ED). Midazolam, as a benzodiazepine is widely used for procedural sedation among paediatrics. We compared the effectiveness and safety of two forms of midazolam prescription; intramuscular (IM) and intravenous (IV). Patients and Methods: A cohort study was conducted on two matched groups of 30 children referred to our ED between 2010 and 2011. The first group received IM midazolam (0.3 mg/kg) and the second group received IV midazolam (0.15 mg/kg) for sedation. For evaluating effectiveness, sedation, irritation and cooperation score were followed every 15 min for 60 min and for safety assessment, vital signs and O 2 saturation were observed. Results: Mean age was 6.18 ± 2.88 years and 31 patients (51.7%) were male. All patients were sedated completely after using first dose. There was an overall complication rate of 68.3%. 35 (58.3%) patients presented euphoria as the most common complication, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.396). Cases who received IV midazolam became sedated faster than those received IM midazolam (P > 0.001). The vital signs including heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure and O 2 saturation changed significantly between and within groups during the sedation (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Both forms of midazolam, IM and IV, are effective and safe for paediatric sedation in ED. Although the sedative with IV form might appear sooner, IM form of midazolam can be effectively used in patient with limited IV access. Patients are better to observe closely for psychological side-effects.http://www.afrjpaedsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0189-6725;year=2014;volume=11;issue=3;spage=219;epage=224;aulast=GhaneMidazolamsafetysedation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammad-Reza Ghane
Hamid-Reza Javadzadeh
Sadrollah Mahmoudi
Bita Najafian
Amin Saburi
spellingShingle Mohammad-Reza Ghane
Hamid-Reza Javadzadeh
Sadrollah Mahmoudi
Bita Najafian
Amin Saburi
Intramuscular compared to intravenous midazolam for paediatric sedation: A study on cardiopulmonary safety and effectiveness
African Journal of Paediatric Surgery
Midazolam
safety
sedation
author_facet Mohammad-Reza Ghane
Hamid-Reza Javadzadeh
Sadrollah Mahmoudi
Bita Najafian
Amin Saburi
author_sort Mohammad-Reza Ghane
title Intramuscular compared to intravenous midazolam for paediatric sedation: A study on cardiopulmonary safety and effectiveness
title_short Intramuscular compared to intravenous midazolam for paediatric sedation: A study on cardiopulmonary safety and effectiveness
title_full Intramuscular compared to intravenous midazolam for paediatric sedation: A study on cardiopulmonary safety and effectiveness
title_fullStr Intramuscular compared to intravenous midazolam for paediatric sedation: A study on cardiopulmonary safety and effectiveness
title_full_unstemmed Intramuscular compared to intravenous midazolam for paediatric sedation: A study on cardiopulmonary safety and effectiveness
title_sort intramuscular compared to intravenous midazolam for paediatric sedation: a study on cardiopulmonary safety and effectiveness
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series African Journal of Paediatric Surgery
issn 0189-6725
0974-5998
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Background: Sedation in children remains a controversial issue in emergency departments (ED). Midazolam, as a benzodiazepine is widely used for procedural sedation among paediatrics. We compared the effectiveness and safety of two forms of midazolam prescription; intramuscular (IM) and intravenous (IV). Patients and Methods: A cohort study was conducted on two matched groups of 30 children referred to our ED between 2010 and 2011. The first group received IM midazolam (0.3 mg/kg) and the second group received IV midazolam (0.15 mg/kg) for sedation. For evaluating effectiveness, sedation, irritation and cooperation score were followed every 15 min for 60 min and for safety assessment, vital signs and O 2 saturation were observed. Results: Mean age was 6.18 ± 2.88 years and 31 patients (51.7%) were male. All patients were sedated completely after using first dose. There was an overall complication rate of 68.3%. 35 (58.3%) patients presented euphoria as the most common complication, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.396). Cases who received IV midazolam became sedated faster than those received IM midazolam (P > 0.001). The vital signs including heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure and O 2 saturation changed significantly between and within groups during the sedation (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Both forms of midazolam, IM and IV, are effective and safe for paediatric sedation in ED. Although the sedative with IV form might appear sooner, IM form of midazolam can be effectively used in patient with limited IV access. Patients are better to observe closely for psychological side-effects.
topic Midazolam
safety
sedation
url http://www.afrjpaedsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0189-6725;year=2014;volume=11;issue=3;spage=219;epage=224;aulast=Ghane
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadrezaghane intramuscularcomparedtointravenousmidazolamforpaediatricsedationastudyoncardiopulmonarysafetyandeffectiveness
AT hamidrezajavadzadeh intramuscularcomparedtointravenousmidazolamforpaediatricsedationastudyoncardiopulmonarysafetyandeffectiveness
AT sadrollahmahmoudi intramuscularcomparedtointravenousmidazolamforpaediatricsedationastudyoncardiopulmonarysafetyandeffectiveness
AT bitanajafian intramuscularcomparedtointravenousmidazolamforpaediatricsedationastudyoncardiopulmonarysafetyandeffectiveness
AT aminsaburi intramuscularcomparedtointravenousmidazolamforpaediatricsedationastudyoncardiopulmonarysafetyandeffectiveness
_version_ 1725776625279172608