Zur Komposition von insofern als im Deutschen

This paper is about the compositional interpretation of adverbial clauses as introduced by insofern als (lit. ‘insofar as’) in German (= IAs); for example, Die Lösung ist insofern attraktiv, als sie günstig ist. (lit. ‘The solution is insofar attractive as it is cheap.’). I argue that IAs always c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bücking Sebastian
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: De Gruyter 2018-06-01
Series:Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2018-0001
id doaj-d2b0efd59a514a6c88ef356ee40b2f47
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d2b0efd59a514a6c88ef356ee40b2f472021-09-05T20:51:39ZdeuDe GruyterZeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft0721-90671613-37062018-06-0137115310.1515/zfs-2018-0001zfs-2018-0001Zur Komposition von insofern als im DeutschenBücking Sebastian0Universität Tübingen, Sonderforschungsbereich 833 „Bedeutungskonstitution“Tübingen, GermanyThis paper is about the compositional interpretation of adverbial clauses as introduced by insofern als (lit. ‘insofar as’) in German (= IAs); for example, Die Lösung ist insofern attraktiv, als sie günstig ist. (lit. ‘The solution is insofar attractive as it is cheap.’). I argue that IAs always contribute dimensional restrictions, but do so in two distinct structure-sensitive ways: IAs can be structurally integrated into their host clauses and, thus, dimensionally specify a lexical component of the matrix VP (= LIAs) (‘The solution is attractive in price.’); alternatively, they can be structurally non-integrated and, thus, provide a dimension against which the matrix sentence is evaluated holistically (= SIAs) (‘In light of the fact that the solution is cheap, one may say that it is attrac­tive.’). The proposal is supported by both syntactic and semantic-pragmatic evidence: (i) LIAs and SIAs are distinguished by independently motivated tests for structural (non)integration such as scope of negation and particles, focus-background structure, and variable binding. (ii) LIAs are sensitive to a lexically given multidimensional matrix predication. SIAs, by contrast, require that the embedded clause specify an objective justification for the truth of the matrix proposition as a whole. In particular, IAs are shown to not pass tests for subjectivity as discussed for finden (‘find’); for example, judge- dependency, resistance against denial, or, accessibility of a subjective attitude. The paper concludes by sketching a formal derivation of both readings. Accordingly, LIAs constrain the dimensional parameter of multidimensional lexical predications, while SIAs provide facts that de re justify the assertibility of predications for topic situations.https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2018-0001explicative-restricting adverbial clausesclausal linkagesyntaxsemantics interface(multi)dimensional predicationsituation semantics
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bücking Sebastian
spellingShingle Bücking Sebastian
Zur Komposition von insofern als im Deutschen
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft
explicative-restricting adverbial clauses
clausal linkage
syntaxsemantics interface
(multi)dimensional predication
situation semantics
author_facet Bücking Sebastian
author_sort Bücking Sebastian
title Zur Komposition von insofern als im Deutschen
title_short Zur Komposition von insofern als im Deutschen
title_full Zur Komposition von insofern als im Deutschen
title_fullStr Zur Komposition von insofern als im Deutschen
title_full_unstemmed Zur Komposition von insofern als im Deutschen
title_sort zur komposition von insofern als im deutschen
publisher De Gruyter
series Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft
issn 0721-9067
1613-3706
publishDate 2018-06-01
description This paper is about the compositional interpretation of adverbial clauses as introduced by insofern als (lit. ‘insofar as’) in German (= IAs); for example, Die Lösung ist insofern attraktiv, als sie günstig ist. (lit. ‘The solution is insofar attractive as it is cheap.’). I argue that IAs always contribute dimensional restrictions, but do so in two distinct structure-sensitive ways: IAs can be structurally integrated into their host clauses and, thus, dimensionally specify a lexical component of the matrix VP (= LIAs) (‘The solution is attractive in price.’); alternatively, they can be structurally non-integrated and, thus, provide a dimension against which the matrix sentence is evaluated holistically (= SIAs) (‘In light of the fact that the solution is cheap, one may say that it is attrac­tive.’). The proposal is supported by both syntactic and semantic-pragmatic evidence: (i) LIAs and SIAs are distinguished by independently motivated tests for structural (non)integration such as scope of negation and particles, focus-background structure, and variable binding. (ii) LIAs are sensitive to a lexically given multidimensional matrix predication. SIAs, by contrast, require that the embedded clause specify an objective justification for the truth of the matrix proposition as a whole. In particular, IAs are shown to not pass tests for subjectivity as discussed for finden (‘find’); for example, judge- dependency, resistance against denial, or, accessibility of a subjective attitude. The paper concludes by sketching a formal derivation of both readings. Accordingly, LIAs constrain the dimensional parameter of multidimensional lexical predications, while SIAs provide facts that de re justify the assertibility of predications for topic situations.
topic explicative-restricting adverbial clauses
clausal linkage
syntaxsemantics interface
(multi)dimensional predication
situation semantics
url https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2018-0001
work_keys_str_mv AT buckingsebastian zurkompositionvoninsofernalsimdeutschen
_version_ 1717783364753162240