Enhancing interdisciplinary climate change work through comprehensive evaluation

This paper shares the details of an evaluation plan from an interdisciplinary climate change project that developed decision support tools (DSTs) for agricultural advisors and farmers. It showcases how evaluation enhanced the project work by providing opportunities for the team to reflect on and use...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jenna Klink, Vikram Koundinya, Kim Kies, Courtney Robinson, Amulya Rao, Claire Berezowitz, Melissa Widhalm, Linda Prokopy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-01-01
Series:Climate Risk Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096316301103
id doaj-d2b20575f2f34d1ea6cfd80eea44c1af
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d2b20575f2f34d1ea6cfd80eea44c1af2020-11-25T01:04:29ZengElsevierClimate Risk Management2212-09632017-01-0115C10912510.1016/j.crm.2016.11.003Enhancing interdisciplinary climate change work through comprehensive evaluationJenna Klink0Vikram Koundinya1Kim Kies2Courtney Robinson3Amulya Rao4Claire Berezowitz5Melissa Widhalm6Linda Prokopy7Environmental Resources Center Evaluation Unit, University of Wisconsin-Extension, 445 Henry Mall, Room 202, Madison, WI 53706, United StatesEnvironmental Resources Center Evaluation Unit, University of Wisconsin-Extension, 445 Henry Mall, Room 202, Madison, WI 53706, United StatesEnvironmental Resources Center Evaluation Unit, University of Wisconsin-Extension, 445 Henry Mall, Room 203, Madison, WI 53706, United StatesEnvironmental Resources Center Evaluation Unit, University of Wisconsin-Extension, 445 Henry Mall, Room 214, Madison, WI 53706, United StatesEnvironmental Resources Center Evaluation Unit, University of Wisconsin-Extension, 445 Henry Mall, Room 214, Madison, WI 53706, United StatesEnvironmental Resources Center Evaluation Unit, University of Wisconsin-Extension, 445 Henry Mall, Room 214, Madison, WI 53706, United StatesForestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, FORS Room 201A, 195 Marsteller St, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United StatesForestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, FORS Room 201B, 195 Marsteller St, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United StatesThis paper shares the details of an evaluation plan from an interdisciplinary climate change project that developed decision support tools (DSTs) for agricultural advisors and farmers. It showcases how evaluation enhanced the project work by providing opportunities for the team to reflect on and use data to improve performance. The plan included both formative and summative approaches, team member interviews to assess team functioning, usability testing of DSTs, outreach and marketing campaign evaluation. Outreach evaluation included surveying those reached, monitoring project website traffic, and tracking and mapping outreach details. Marketing evaluation included pre-testing campaign materials, assessing open and click rates of email campaign, and monitoring associated traffic to website. The Useful to Usable (U2U) team was generally high functioning, but team interviews allowed the evaluators and leaders to discern factors that were influencing intended outcomes, respond to needs, assign resources, and catalyze activities that were crucial in shaping the outcomes. Usability testing surfaced issues related to default values and search and help features that were addressed by the team and resulted in improved usability. Outreach evaluation found geographic and methodological gaps that were filled, resulting in more target audiences reached and more effective methods used (e.g., hands-on events). Marketing evaluation allowed for improving contact lists over time and improving campaign messaging before deployment. Evaluators and project leaders working on similar projects may adapt or utilize methods detailed in this paper, along with the recommendations, while designing and implementing improvement-oriented evaluation plans.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096316301103Mixed methods evaluationStakeholder engagementInterdisciplinary teamUsability testingMarketing campaignOutreach evaluation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jenna Klink
Vikram Koundinya
Kim Kies
Courtney Robinson
Amulya Rao
Claire Berezowitz
Melissa Widhalm
Linda Prokopy
spellingShingle Jenna Klink
Vikram Koundinya
Kim Kies
Courtney Robinson
Amulya Rao
Claire Berezowitz
Melissa Widhalm
Linda Prokopy
Enhancing interdisciplinary climate change work through comprehensive evaluation
Climate Risk Management
Mixed methods evaluation
Stakeholder engagement
Interdisciplinary team
Usability testing
Marketing campaign
Outreach evaluation
author_facet Jenna Klink
Vikram Koundinya
Kim Kies
Courtney Robinson
Amulya Rao
Claire Berezowitz
Melissa Widhalm
Linda Prokopy
author_sort Jenna Klink
title Enhancing interdisciplinary climate change work through comprehensive evaluation
title_short Enhancing interdisciplinary climate change work through comprehensive evaluation
title_full Enhancing interdisciplinary climate change work through comprehensive evaluation
title_fullStr Enhancing interdisciplinary climate change work through comprehensive evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing interdisciplinary climate change work through comprehensive evaluation
title_sort enhancing interdisciplinary climate change work through comprehensive evaluation
publisher Elsevier
series Climate Risk Management
issn 2212-0963
publishDate 2017-01-01
description This paper shares the details of an evaluation plan from an interdisciplinary climate change project that developed decision support tools (DSTs) for agricultural advisors and farmers. It showcases how evaluation enhanced the project work by providing opportunities for the team to reflect on and use data to improve performance. The plan included both formative and summative approaches, team member interviews to assess team functioning, usability testing of DSTs, outreach and marketing campaign evaluation. Outreach evaluation included surveying those reached, monitoring project website traffic, and tracking and mapping outreach details. Marketing evaluation included pre-testing campaign materials, assessing open and click rates of email campaign, and monitoring associated traffic to website. The Useful to Usable (U2U) team was generally high functioning, but team interviews allowed the evaluators and leaders to discern factors that were influencing intended outcomes, respond to needs, assign resources, and catalyze activities that were crucial in shaping the outcomes. Usability testing surfaced issues related to default values and search and help features that were addressed by the team and resulted in improved usability. Outreach evaluation found geographic and methodological gaps that were filled, resulting in more target audiences reached and more effective methods used (e.g., hands-on events). Marketing evaluation allowed for improving contact lists over time and improving campaign messaging before deployment. Evaluators and project leaders working on similar projects may adapt or utilize methods detailed in this paper, along with the recommendations, while designing and implementing improvement-oriented evaluation plans.
topic Mixed methods evaluation
Stakeholder engagement
Interdisciplinary team
Usability testing
Marketing campaign
Outreach evaluation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096316301103
work_keys_str_mv AT jennaklink enhancinginterdisciplinaryclimatechangeworkthroughcomprehensiveevaluation
AT vikramkoundinya enhancinginterdisciplinaryclimatechangeworkthroughcomprehensiveevaluation
AT kimkies enhancinginterdisciplinaryclimatechangeworkthroughcomprehensiveevaluation
AT courtneyrobinson enhancinginterdisciplinaryclimatechangeworkthroughcomprehensiveevaluation
AT amulyarao enhancinginterdisciplinaryclimatechangeworkthroughcomprehensiveevaluation
AT claireberezowitz enhancinginterdisciplinaryclimatechangeworkthroughcomprehensiveevaluation
AT melissawidhalm enhancinginterdisciplinaryclimatechangeworkthroughcomprehensiveevaluation
AT lindaprokopy enhancinginterdisciplinaryclimatechangeworkthroughcomprehensiveevaluation
_version_ 1725197808986750976