Eutrophication and water quality policy discourse in Lake Erie Basin

Watershed-based approaches to addressing water quality issues often involve a diverse set of actors working collaboratively to develop policy. Such an approach is currently underway in the Western Lake Erie Basin, where the province of Ontario and the state of Ohio have embarked on a 40% phosphorus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bereket N. Isaac, Rob de Loë
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Water Alternatives Association 2020-10-01
Series:Water Alternatives
Subjects:
usa
Online Access:http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol13/v13issue3/593-a13-3-11/file
id doaj-d2b77f6b22fd4332bb5f9ef7657d3f47
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d2b77f6b22fd4332bb5f9ef7657d3f472020-11-25T03:05:29ZengWater Alternatives AssociationWater Alternatives1965-01751965-01752020-10-01133800821Eutrophication and water quality policy discourse in Lake Erie BasinBereket N. Isaac0Rob de Loë1University of WaterlooUniversity of WaterlooWatershed-based approaches to addressing water quality issues often involve a diverse set of actors working collaboratively to develop policy. Such an approach is currently underway in the Western Lake Erie Basin, where the province of Ontario and the state of Ohio have embarked on a 40% phosphorus run-off reduction target to address eutrophication problems in the lake. In this study, we adopt the concept of discourse to inform our understanding of the collaborative process undertaken to develop domestic action plans (DAPs) to guide efforts by various stakeholders. We find that in both cases there were distinct groups of actors who shared and promoted a particular narrative or storyline. These storylines provided varying accounts of the science and policy aspects of the eutrophication problem in Lake Erie, and there was variation as well in the specific actors to whom they attributed responsibility. We illustrate how the storylines shaped the nature and form of the action plans. We provide a discussion of the policy implications of unequal capacities among different actor coalitions to influence trajectories and outcomes in the context of governance for water quality. It is shown that the potential of discourse coalitions to influence policy raises important questions as to whose voice is considered legitimate enough to be included in the policy process.http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol13/v13issue3/593-a13-3-11/filelake erieeutrophicationwater policydiscourse analysisstorylinescanadausa
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bereket N. Isaac
Rob de Loë
spellingShingle Bereket N. Isaac
Rob de Loë
Eutrophication and water quality policy discourse in Lake Erie Basin
Water Alternatives
lake erie
eutrophication
water policy
discourse analysis
storylines
canada
usa
author_facet Bereket N. Isaac
Rob de Loë
author_sort Bereket N. Isaac
title Eutrophication and water quality policy discourse in Lake Erie Basin
title_short Eutrophication and water quality policy discourse in Lake Erie Basin
title_full Eutrophication and water quality policy discourse in Lake Erie Basin
title_fullStr Eutrophication and water quality policy discourse in Lake Erie Basin
title_full_unstemmed Eutrophication and water quality policy discourse in Lake Erie Basin
title_sort eutrophication and water quality policy discourse in lake erie basin
publisher Water Alternatives Association
series Water Alternatives
issn 1965-0175
1965-0175
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Watershed-based approaches to addressing water quality issues often involve a diverse set of actors working collaboratively to develop policy. Such an approach is currently underway in the Western Lake Erie Basin, where the province of Ontario and the state of Ohio have embarked on a 40% phosphorus run-off reduction target to address eutrophication problems in the lake. In this study, we adopt the concept of discourse to inform our understanding of the collaborative process undertaken to develop domestic action plans (DAPs) to guide efforts by various stakeholders. We find that in both cases there were distinct groups of actors who shared and promoted a particular narrative or storyline. These storylines provided varying accounts of the science and policy aspects of the eutrophication problem in Lake Erie, and there was variation as well in the specific actors to whom they attributed responsibility. We illustrate how the storylines shaped the nature and form of the action plans. We provide a discussion of the policy implications of unequal capacities among different actor coalitions to influence trajectories and outcomes in the context of governance for water quality. It is shown that the potential of discourse coalitions to influence policy raises important questions as to whose voice is considered legitimate enough to be included in the policy process.
topic lake erie
eutrophication
water policy
discourse analysis
storylines
canada
usa
url http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol13/v13issue3/593-a13-3-11/file
work_keys_str_mv AT bereketnisaac eutrophicationandwaterqualitypolicydiscourseinlakeeriebasin
AT robdeloe eutrophicationandwaterqualitypolicydiscourseinlakeeriebasin
_version_ 1724678302067589120