RETRACTED ARTICLE: Comparison of two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP—a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studies

Abstract Background Decompressive laminectomy (DI) is a standard operation for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patient with severe claudication symptoms for many years. However, patients whose symptom severity does not meet undergoing invasive surgery make therapeutic options into dilemma. Interspinous...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: He Zhao, Li-Jun Duan, Yu-Shan Gao, Yong-Dong Yang, Ding-Yan Zhao, Xiang-Sheng Tang, Zhen-guo Hu, Chuan-Hong Li, Si-Xue Chen, Tao Liu, Xing Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-03-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-018-0742-0
id doaj-d2ed16d7bd444e86acdd63bb299484ed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d2ed16d7bd444e86acdd63bb299484ed2020-11-24T21:20:53ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2018-03-011311810.1186/s13018-018-0742-0RETRACTED ARTICLE: Comparison of two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP—a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studiesHe Zhao0Li-Jun Duan1Yu-Shan Gao2Yong-Dong Yang3Ding-Yan Zhao4Xiang-Sheng Tang5Zhen-guo Hu6Chuan-Hong Li7Si-Xue Chen8Tao Liu9Xing Yu10Department of Orthopedics III, Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese MedicineDepartment of Orthopedics, Bayannaoer City HospitalSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese MedicineDepartment of Orthopedics III, Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese MedicineDepartment of Orthopedics III, Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese MedicineDepartment of Orthopedics, China-Japan Friendship Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese MedicineDepartment of Orthopedics III, Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese MedicineDepartment of Orthopedics III, Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese MedicineDepartment of Orthopedics III, Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese MedicineDepartment of Orthopedics III, Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese MedicineDepartment of Orthopedics III, Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese MedicineAbstract Background Decompressive laminectomy (DI) is a standard operation for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patient with severe claudication symptoms for many years. However, patients whose symptom severity does not meet undergoing invasive surgery make therapeutic options into dilemma. Interspinous spacers (ISP) bridge the gap between surgical interventions and CC in management of LSS. In our study, we aim to systematically assess the two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP. Methods Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library were searched to retrieve clinical trials concerning the comparison between Superion and X-STOP in treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis before April 2017. The following outcome measures were extracted: (1) Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) patient satisfaction score, (2) axial pain severity, (3) extremity pain severity, (4) back-specific functional impairment, (5) reoperation, and (6) complication. The data analysis was conducted with Review Manager 5.3. Results Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1118 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled analysis indicated that the Superion group is superior to X-STOP in axial pain severity (SMD: 0.03; 95% CI 0.15, 0.45; p < 0.0001, I 2 = 41%, p = 0.16), ZCQ patient satisfaction score (SMD: 0.23; 95% CI 0.08, 0.38; p = 0.002, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.61). However, Superion group showed similarity outcome in extremity pain severity (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI − 0.06, 0.43; p = 0.14, I 2 = 62%, p = 0.05), back-specific functional impairment (SMD: 0.04; 95% CI − 0.10, 0.19; p = 0.56, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.77), reoperation rate (RR: 1.10; 95% CI 0.82, 1.48; p = 0.51, I 2 = 19%, p = 0.30), and complication (RR: 0.98; 95% CI 0.63, 1.53; p = 0.92, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.83). Conclusion Both the Superion and X-STOP interspinous spacers can relieve symptoms of LSS. In addition, the Superion spacer may represent a promising spacer for patient with LSS. As we know, the effectiveness and safety of ISP is still considered investigational and unfavor clinical results in the medical literature may continue to limit the appeal of IPS to many surgeons in the future. However, because of the advantage of IPS technique, it will win a wide place in the future degenerative lumbar microsurgery.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-018-0742-0SuperionX-STOPFollow-upMeta-analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author He Zhao
Li-Jun Duan
Yu-Shan Gao
Yong-Dong Yang
Ding-Yan Zhao
Xiang-Sheng Tang
Zhen-guo Hu
Chuan-Hong Li
Si-Xue Chen
Tao Liu
Xing Yu
spellingShingle He Zhao
Li-Jun Duan
Yu-Shan Gao
Yong-Dong Yang
Ding-Yan Zhao
Xiang-Sheng Tang
Zhen-guo Hu
Chuan-Hong Li
Si-Xue Chen
Tao Liu
Xing Yu
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Comparison of two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP—a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studies
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Superion
X-STOP
Follow-up
Meta-analysis
author_facet He Zhao
Li-Jun Duan
Yu-Shan Gao
Yong-Dong Yang
Ding-Yan Zhao
Xiang-Sheng Tang
Zhen-guo Hu
Chuan-Hong Li
Si-Xue Chen
Tao Liu
Xing Yu
author_sort He Zhao
title RETRACTED ARTICLE: Comparison of two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP—a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studies
title_short RETRACTED ARTICLE: Comparison of two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP—a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studies
title_full RETRACTED ARTICLE: Comparison of two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP—a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studies
title_fullStr RETRACTED ARTICLE: Comparison of two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP—a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studies
title_full_unstemmed RETRACTED ARTICLE: Comparison of two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP—a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studies
title_sort retracted article: comparison of two fda-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: superion versus x-stop—a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studies
publisher BMC
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
issn 1749-799X
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Abstract Background Decompressive laminectomy (DI) is a standard operation for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patient with severe claudication symptoms for many years. However, patients whose symptom severity does not meet undergoing invasive surgery make therapeutic options into dilemma. Interspinous spacers (ISP) bridge the gap between surgical interventions and CC in management of LSS. In our study, we aim to systematically assess the two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP. Methods Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library were searched to retrieve clinical trials concerning the comparison between Superion and X-STOP in treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis before April 2017. The following outcome measures were extracted: (1) Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) patient satisfaction score, (2) axial pain severity, (3) extremity pain severity, (4) back-specific functional impairment, (5) reoperation, and (6) complication. The data analysis was conducted with Review Manager 5.3. Results Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1118 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled analysis indicated that the Superion group is superior to X-STOP in axial pain severity (SMD: 0.03; 95% CI 0.15, 0.45; p < 0.0001, I 2 = 41%, p = 0.16), ZCQ patient satisfaction score (SMD: 0.23; 95% CI 0.08, 0.38; p = 0.002, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.61). However, Superion group showed similarity outcome in extremity pain severity (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI − 0.06, 0.43; p = 0.14, I 2 = 62%, p = 0.05), back-specific functional impairment (SMD: 0.04; 95% CI − 0.10, 0.19; p = 0.56, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.77), reoperation rate (RR: 1.10; 95% CI 0.82, 1.48; p = 0.51, I 2 = 19%, p = 0.30), and complication (RR: 0.98; 95% CI 0.63, 1.53; p = 0.92, I 2 = 0%, p = 0.83). Conclusion Both the Superion and X-STOP interspinous spacers can relieve symptoms of LSS. In addition, the Superion spacer may represent a promising spacer for patient with LSS. As we know, the effectiveness and safety of ISP is still considered investigational and unfavor clinical results in the medical literature may continue to limit the appeal of IPS to many surgeons in the future. However, because of the advantage of IPS technique, it will win a wide place in the future degenerative lumbar microsurgery.
topic Superion
X-STOP
Follow-up
Meta-analysis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-018-0742-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hezhao retractedarticlecomparisonoftwofdaapprovedinterspinousspacersfortreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosissuperionversusxstopametaanalysisfromfiverandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
AT lijunduan retractedarticlecomparisonoftwofdaapprovedinterspinousspacersfortreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosissuperionversusxstopametaanalysisfromfiverandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
AT yushangao retractedarticlecomparisonoftwofdaapprovedinterspinousspacersfortreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosissuperionversusxstopametaanalysisfromfiverandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
AT yongdongyang retractedarticlecomparisonoftwofdaapprovedinterspinousspacersfortreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosissuperionversusxstopametaanalysisfromfiverandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
AT dingyanzhao retractedarticlecomparisonoftwofdaapprovedinterspinousspacersfortreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosissuperionversusxstopametaanalysisfromfiverandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
AT xiangshengtang retractedarticlecomparisonoftwofdaapprovedinterspinousspacersfortreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosissuperionversusxstopametaanalysisfromfiverandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
AT zhenguohu retractedarticlecomparisonoftwofdaapprovedinterspinousspacersfortreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosissuperionversusxstopametaanalysisfromfiverandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
AT chuanhongli retractedarticlecomparisonoftwofdaapprovedinterspinousspacersfortreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosissuperionversusxstopametaanalysisfromfiverandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
AT sixuechen retractedarticlecomparisonoftwofdaapprovedinterspinousspacersfortreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosissuperionversusxstopametaanalysisfromfiverandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
AT taoliu retractedarticlecomparisonoftwofdaapprovedinterspinousspacersfortreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosissuperionversusxstopametaanalysisfromfiverandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
AT xingyu retractedarticlecomparisonoftwofdaapprovedinterspinousspacersfortreatmentoflumbarspinalstenosissuperionversusxstopametaanalysisfromfiverandomizedcontrolledtrialstudies
_version_ 1726002334789533696