THE ROLE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECT’S STATUS AT THE REAL ESTATE VALUATION

Introduction. The transition to the use of cadastral value as a basis for taxation on land and property taxes has generated a lot of questions. One of them is the consideration of public-law restrictions in the process of cadastral and market appraisal. The most frequent of such restrictions is the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vladislav Yu. Sutyagin, Yana Yu. Radyukova, Yuliya S. Sutyagina
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Volgograd State University 2018-06-01
Series:Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 3, Èkonomika,Èkologiâ
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ges.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/archive-en/426-science-journal-of-volsu-global-economic-system-2018-vol-20-2/finance-auditing/1326-sutyagin-v-yu-radyukova-ya-yu-sutyagina-yu-s-the-role-of-cultural-heritage-object-s-status-at-the-real-estate-valuation
id doaj-d31e39ccaa9c4891a50625772a0b5277
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d31e39ccaa9c4891a50625772a0b52772020-11-25T00:50:52ZrusVolgograd State UniversityVestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 3, Èkonomika,Èkologiâ1998-992X2408-94782018-06-012029310310.15688/jvolsu3.2018.2.10THE ROLE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECT’S STATUS AT THE REAL ESTATE VALUATION Vladislav Yu. Sutyagin 0Yana Yu. Radyukova 1Yuliya S. Sutyagina 2Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin, Tambov; Expert Council of the Self-Regulatory Organization Free Appraisal Department, Ekaterinburg; Otsenka+ LLC, Tambov, Russian FederationTambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin, Tambov, Russian Federation Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin, Tambov, Russian Federation Introduction. The transition to the use of cadastral value as a basis for taxation on land and property taxes has generated a lot of questions. One of them is the consideration of public-law restrictions in the process of cadastral and market appraisal. The most frequent of such restrictions is the existence of the status of an object of cultural heritage. Method or methodology. In the general scientific basis, the methods used in this study include the analysis, deduction, comparative analysis, and the logical method. In addition, the following specific scientific methods have been used: the method of analyzing the regulatory framework, paired analysis methods (in the case of pair sales analysis and pairwise income comparison analysis), and loss accounting (in the loss-of-benefit methods and the constraint analysis method). In the process of considering the method of constraint analysis, the authors use the method of calculating the coefficient, taking into account the size of such limitations. Results of the work. The complexity of accounting for such limitations in the evaluation process is due to the fact that this topic has been poorly developed in the evaluation theory and in practice. The authors note that the status of the object of cultural heritage leads to both additional advantages and encumbrances for the owner of real estate, which should be taken into account separately. The main methods of estimating such encumbrances are considered in the article. Of particular value is the authors’ methodology for analyzing constraints. Themethod is based on the analysis of the security obligation and the resulting limitations of the owner’s rights related to the status of the cultural heritage site, as well as the methodology for calculating the coefficient reflecting these limitations. Scope of application of the results. The results of this study can be used for further theoretical studies on the valuation of cultural heritage sites, as well as in the practice of valuation activities. Conclusion. The conducted research expands the methodological base for assessing the limitations resulting from the status of the cultural heritage site. The logic of the proposed method of constraint analysis is illustrated by the example given by the authors. http://ges.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/archive-en/426-science-journal-of-volsu-global-economic-system-2018-vol-20-2/finance-auditing/1326-sutyagin-v-yu-radyukova-ya-yu-sutyagina-yu-s-the-role-of-cultural-heritage-object-s-status-at-the-real-estate-valuationmarket valuecapital construction objectcultural heritage objectscoringcadastral valueappraisal activity
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vladislav Yu. Sutyagin
Yana Yu. Radyukova
Yuliya S. Sutyagina
spellingShingle Vladislav Yu. Sutyagin
Yana Yu. Radyukova
Yuliya S. Sutyagina
THE ROLE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECT’S STATUS AT THE REAL ESTATE VALUATION
Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 3, Èkonomika,Èkologiâ
market value
capital construction object
cultural heritage object
scoring
cadastral value
appraisal activity
author_facet Vladislav Yu. Sutyagin
Yana Yu. Radyukova
Yuliya S. Sutyagina
author_sort Vladislav Yu. Sutyagin
title THE ROLE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECT’S STATUS AT THE REAL ESTATE VALUATION
title_short THE ROLE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECT’S STATUS AT THE REAL ESTATE VALUATION
title_full THE ROLE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECT’S STATUS AT THE REAL ESTATE VALUATION
title_fullStr THE ROLE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECT’S STATUS AT THE REAL ESTATE VALUATION
title_full_unstemmed THE ROLE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECT’S STATUS AT THE REAL ESTATE VALUATION
title_sort role of cultural heritage object’s status at the real estate valuation
publisher Volgograd State University
series Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 3, Èkonomika,Èkologiâ
issn 1998-992X
2408-9478
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Introduction. The transition to the use of cadastral value as a basis for taxation on land and property taxes has generated a lot of questions. One of them is the consideration of public-law restrictions in the process of cadastral and market appraisal. The most frequent of such restrictions is the existence of the status of an object of cultural heritage. Method or methodology. In the general scientific basis, the methods used in this study include the analysis, deduction, comparative analysis, and the logical method. In addition, the following specific scientific methods have been used: the method of analyzing the regulatory framework, paired analysis methods (in the case of pair sales analysis and pairwise income comparison analysis), and loss accounting (in the loss-of-benefit methods and the constraint analysis method). In the process of considering the method of constraint analysis, the authors use the method of calculating the coefficient, taking into account the size of such limitations. Results of the work. The complexity of accounting for such limitations in the evaluation process is due to the fact that this topic has been poorly developed in the evaluation theory and in practice. The authors note that the status of the object of cultural heritage leads to both additional advantages and encumbrances for the owner of real estate, which should be taken into account separately. The main methods of estimating such encumbrances are considered in the article. Of particular value is the authors’ methodology for analyzing constraints. Themethod is based on the analysis of the security obligation and the resulting limitations of the owner’s rights related to the status of the cultural heritage site, as well as the methodology for calculating the coefficient reflecting these limitations. Scope of application of the results. The results of this study can be used for further theoretical studies on the valuation of cultural heritage sites, as well as in the practice of valuation activities. Conclusion. The conducted research expands the methodological base for assessing the limitations resulting from the status of the cultural heritage site. The logic of the proposed method of constraint analysis is illustrated by the example given by the authors.
topic market value
capital construction object
cultural heritage object
scoring
cadastral value
appraisal activity
url http://ges.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/archive-en/426-science-journal-of-volsu-global-economic-system-2018-vol-20-2/finance-auditing/1326-sutyagin-v-yu-radyukova-ya-yu-sutyagina-yu-s-the-role-of-cultural-heritage-object-s-status-at-the-real-estate-valuation
work_keys_str_mv AT vladislavyusutyagin theroleofculturalheritageobjectsstatusattherealestatevaluation
AT yanayuradyukova theroleofculturalheritageobjectsstatusattherealestatevaluation
AT yuliyassutyagina theroleofculturalheritageobjectsstatusattherealestatevaluation
AT vladislavyusutyagin roleofculturalheritageobjectsstatusattherealestatevaluation
AT yanayuradyukova roleofculturalheritageobjectsstatusattherealestatevaluation
AT yuliyassutyagina roleofculturalheritageobjectsstatusattherealestatevaluation
_version_ 1725246128586227712