Chemistry and Bioactivity of NeoMTA Plus™ versus MTA Angelus® Root Repair Materials
Objectives. To analyse the chemistry and bioactivity of NeoMTA Plus in comparison with the conventional root repair materials. Method and Materials. Unhydrated and hydrated (initial and final sets) materials were analysed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (XRD)....
Main Authors: | Sawsan T. Abu Zeid, Najlaa M. Alamoudi, Monazah G. Khafagi, Ensanya A. Abou Neel |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Spectroscopy |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8736428 |
Similar Items
-
Biocompatibility of NeoMTA Plus® versus MTA Angelus as delayed furcation perforation repair materials in a dog model
by: Khaled M. Abboud, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Cytotoxicity of NeoMTA Plus, ProRoot MTA and Biodentine on human dental pulp stem cells
by: Sinem Birant, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
The Effectiveness of Laser-Activated Irrigation on the Apical Microleakage Qualities of MTA Repair HP and NeoMTA Plus in Simulated Immature Teeth: A Comparative Study
by: Serenad Çırakoğlu, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Comparison of Rat Connective Tissue Response to BioMTA, Angelus MTA, and Root MTA
by: Marzieh Alimohammadi, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Deconvolution of the particle size distribution of ProRoot MTA and MTA Angelus
by: William Nguyen Ha, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01)