Social discord as the foundation of republicanism in Machiavelli’s thought

The purpose of this paper is to introduce the concept of social discord, based on the analysis of early chapters of Niccolo Machiavelli’s Discourses on Livy. I argue that, by deriving a broader philosophical concept from Machiavelli’s peculiar position that strife between the plebs and the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matić Ivan
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade 2014-01-01
Series:Filozofija i Društvo
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2014/0353-57381404123M.pdf
id doaj-d3a875f2ad184febb0f622701476638f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d3a875f2ad184febb0f622701476638f2020-11-24T21:10:26ZdeuInstitute for Philosophy and Social Theory, BelgradeFilozofija i Društvo0353-57382014-01-0125412314510.2298/FID1404123M0353-57381404123MSocial discord as the foundation of republicanism in Machiavelli’s thoughtMatić Ivan0Faculty of Philosophy, BelgradeThe purpose of this paper is to introduce the concept of social discord, based on the analysis of early chapters of Niccolo Machiavelli’s Discourses on Livy. I argue that, by deriving a broader philosophical concept from Machiavelli’s peculiar position that strife between the plebs and the senate made the Roman republic free and powerful (Machiavelli 1998: 16), we can greatly enhance our understanding of not only some of the more original and controversial positions within the Florentine theorist’s magnum opus, but also of his thought in general. Furthermore, by analyzing crucial moments within Machiavelli’s observation of the rise and fall of the Roman republic through the lens of social discord, I argue that the concept can be established as the foundation of his understanding of republicanism, while contesting his designation of the people as the guardians of liberty. Finally, I contrast the concept of social discord with that of social conflict - a subtle and seemingly negligible distinction that can, in my understanding of Machiavelli’s thought, nonetheless mean the difference between a republic’s development and prosperity and its untimely downfall.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2014/0353-57381404123M.pdfMachiavellirepublicanismsocial discordsocial conflictRoman Republicplebssenatefreedom
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matić Ivan
spellingShingle Matić Ivan
Social discord as the foundation of republicanism in Machiavelli’s thought
Filozofija i Društvo
Machiavelli
republicanism
social discord
social conflict
Roman Republic
plebs
senate
freedom
author_facet Matić Ivan
author_sort Matić Ivan
title Social discord as the foundation of republicanism in Machiavelli’s thought
title_short Social discord as the foundation of republicanism in Machiavelli’s thought
title_full Social discord as the foundation of republicanism in Machiavelli’s thought
title_fullStr Social discord as the foundation of republicanism in Machiavelli’s thought
title_full_unstemmed Social discord as the foundation of republicanism in Machiavelli’s thought
title_sort social discord as the foundation of republicanism in machiavelli’s thought
publisher Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade
series Filozofija i Društvo
issn 0353-5738
publishDate 2014-01-01
description The purpose of this paper is to introduce the concept of social discord, based on the analysis of early chapters of Niccolo Machiavelli’s Discourses on Livy. I argue that, by deriving a broader philosophical concept from Machiavelli’s peculiar position that strife between the plebs and the senate made the Roman republic free and powerful (Machiavelli 1998: 16), we can greatly enhance our understanding of not only some of the more original and controversial positions within the Florentine theorist’s magnum opus, but also of his thought in general. Furthermore, by analyzing crucial moments within Machiavelli’s observation of the rise and fall of the Roman republic through the lens of social discord, I argue that the concept can be established as the foundation of his understanding of republicanism, while contesting his designation of the people as the guardians of liberty. Finally, I contrast the concept of social discord with that of social conflict - a subtle and seemingly negligible distinction that can, in my understanding of Machiavelli’s thought, nonetheless mean the difference between a republic’s development and prosperity and its untimely downfall.
topic Machiavelli
republicanism
social discord
social conflict
Roman Republic
plebs
senate
freedom
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2014/0353-57381404123M.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT maticivan socialdiscordasthefoundationofrepublicanisminmachiavellisthought
_version_ 1716756584481161216