The TheraCyte™ Device Protects against Islet Allograft Rejection in Immunized Hosts

Clinically, many candidates for islet transplantation are already immunized, which increases their risk of graft rejection. Encapsulation of pancreatic islets using the TheraCyte™ device has been shown to protect against allograft rejection in nonimmunized recipients. However, the capacity of the Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Makiko Kumagai-Braesch, Stella Jacobson, Hiroki Mori, Xiaohui Jia, Tohru Takahashi, Annika Wernerson, Malin Flodström-Tullberg, Annika Tibell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2013-07-01
Series:Cell Transplantation
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3727/096368912X657486
id doaj-d3b7a17271fb4a18bc33d85565ba2315
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d3b7a17271fb4a18bc33d85565ba23152020-11-25T02:59:27ZengSAGE PublishingCell Transplantation0963-68971555-38922013-07-012210.3727/096368912X657486The TheraCyte™ Device Protects against Islet Allograft Rejection in Immunized HostsMakiko Kumagai-Braesch0Stella Jacobson1Hiroki Mori2Xiaohui Jia3Tohru Takahashi4Annika Wernerson5Malin Flodström-Tullberg6Annika Tibell7Division of Transplantation Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SwedenCenter for Infectious Medicine, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SwedenDivision of Transplantation Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SwedenDivision of Transplantation Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SwedenDivision of Transplantation Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SwedenDivision of Renal Medicine, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SwedenCenter for Infectious Medicine, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SwedenDivision of Transplantation Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SwedenClinically, many candidates for islet transplantation are already immunized, which increases their risk of graft rejection. Encapsulation of pancreatic islets using the TheraCyte™ device has been shown to protect against allograft rejection in nonimmunized recipients. However, the capacity of the TheraCyte™ device to prevent rejection in immunized recipients has not yet been studied. In this study, the protective capacity of the TheraCyte™ device was evaluated in an allogeneic rat model. Lewis rats were used as islet donors, and nonimmunized (control) and alloimmunized, diabetic Wistar–Furth (WF) rats were used as recipients. Graft survival was shorter in immunized recipients than in nonimmunized recipients (mean survival, 5.3 ± 2.7 and 9.3 ± 1.6 days, respectively, p < 0.01) when nonencapsulated islets were transplanted under the kidney capsule. When islets were transplanted into the TheraCyte™ device, graft function was maintained during the 6-month study period in both immunized and nonimmunized rats. In oral glucose tolerance tests performed at 1 month after transplantation, both groups had similar insulin and blood glucose levels indicating similar metabolic functions. Volume densities and absolute volumes of tissue inside the devices 6 months after transplantation were also comparable between the two groups, indicating that both groups maintained similar amounts of endocrine tissue. A higher number of IFN-γ-producing CD8 + T-cells were detected in immunized WF rats compared to control WF rats transplanted with encapsulated islets. This suggests that donor-specific alloreactivity in recipient rats was sustained throughout the study period. This study suggests that the TheraCyte™ device protects islet allografts also in immunized recipients. Our results further highlight the potential for using macroencapsulation to avoid immunosuppressive therapy in clinical islet transplantation.https://doi.org/10.3727/096368912X657486
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Makiko Kumagai-Braesch
Stella Jacobson
Hiroki Mori
Xiaohui Jia
Tohru Takahashi
Annika Wernerson
Malin Flodström-Tullberg
Annika Tibell
spellingShingle Makiko Kumagai-Braesch
Stella Jacobson
Hiroki Mori
Xiaohui Jia
Tohru Takahashi
Annika Wernerson
Malin Flodström-Tullberg
Annika Tibell
The TheraCyte™ Device Protects against Islet Allograft Rejection in Immunized Hosts
Cell Transplantation
author_facet Makiko Kumagai-Braesch
Stella Jacobson
Hiroki Mori
Xiaohui Jia
Tohru Takahashi
Annika Wernerson
Malin Flodström-Tullberg
Annika Tibell
author_sort Makiko Kumagai-Braesch
title The TheraCyte™ Device Protects against Islet Allograft Rejection in Immunized Hosts
title_short The TheraCyte™ Device Protects against Islet Allograft Rejection in Immunized Hosts
title_full The TheraCyte™ Device Protects against Islet Allograft Rejection in Immunized Hosts
title_fullStr The TheraCyte™ Device Protects against Islet Allograft Rejection in Immunized Hosts
title_full_unstemmed The TheraCyte™ Device Protects against Islet Allograft Rejection in Immunized Hosts
title_sort theracyte™ device protects against islet allograft rejection in immunized hosts
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Cell Transplantation
issn 0963-6897
1555-3892
publishDate 2013-07-01
description Clinically, many candidates for islet transplantation are already immunized, which increases their risk of graft rejection. Encapsulation of pancreatic islets using the TheraCyte™ device has been shown to protect against allograft rejection in nonimmunized recipients. However, the capacity of the TheraCyte™ device to prevent rejection in immunized recipients has not yet been studied. In this study, the protective capacity of the TheraCyte™ device was evaluated in an allogeneic rat model. Lewis rats were used as islet donors, and nonimmunized (control) and alloimmunized, diabetic Wistar–Furth (WF) rats were used as recipients. Graft survival was shorter in immunized recipients than in nonimmunized recipients (mean survival, 5.3 ± 2.7 and 9.3 ± 1.6 days, respectively, p < 0.01) when nonencapsulated islets were transplanted under the kidney capsule. When islets were transplanted into the TheraCyte™ device, graft function was maintained during the 6-month study period in both immunized and nonimmunized rats. In oral glucose tolerance tests performed at 1 month after transplantation, both groups had similar insulin and blood glucose levels indicating similar metabolic functions. Volume densities and absolute volumes of tissue inside the devices 6 months after transplantation were also comparable between the two groups, indicating that both groups maintained similar amounts of endocrine tissue. A higher number of IFN-γ-producing CD8 + T-cells were detected in immunized WF rats compared to control WF rats transplanted with encapsulated islets. This suggests that donor-specific alloreactivity in recipient rats was sustained throughout the study period. This study suggests that the TheraCyte™ device protects islet allografts also in immunized recipients. Our results further highlight the potential for using macroencapsulation to avoid immunosuppressive therapy in clinical islet transplantation.
url https://doi.org/10.3727/096368912X657486
work_keys_str_mv AT makikokumagaibraesch thetheracytedeviceprotectsagainstisletallograftrejectioninimmunizedhosts
AT stellajacobson thetheracytedeviceprotectsagainstisletallograftrejectioninimmunizedhosts
AT hirokimori thetheracytedeviceprotectsagainstisletallograftrejectioninimmunizedhosts
AT xiaohuijia thetheracytedeviceprotectsagainstisletallograftrejectioninimmunizedhosts
AT tohrutakahashi thetheracytedeviceprotectsagainstisletallograftrejectioninimmunizedhosts
AT annikawernerson thetheracytedeviceprotectsagainstisletallograftrejectioninimmunizedhosts
AT malinflodstromtullberg thetheracytedeviceprotectsagainstisletallograftrejectioninimmunizedhosts
AT annikatibell thetheracytedeviceprotectsagainstisletallograftrejectioninimmunizedhosts
AT makikokumagaibraesch theracytedeviceprotectsagainstisletallograftrejectioninimmunizedhosts
AT stellajacobson theracytedeviceprotectsagainstisletallograftrejectioninimmunizedhosts
AT hirokimori theracytedeviceprotectsagainstisletallograftrejectioninimmunizedhosts
AT xiaohuijia theracytedeviceprotectsagainstisletallograftrejectioninimmunizedhosts
AT tohrutakahashi theracytedeviceprotectsagainstisletallograftrejectioninimmunizedhosts
AT annikawernerson theracytedeviceprotectsagainstisletallograftrejectioninimmunizedhosts
AT malinflodstromtullberg theracytedeviceprotectsagainstisletallograftrejectioninimmunizedhosts
AT annikatibell theracytedeviceprotectsagainstisletallograftrejectioninimmunizedhosts
_version_ 1724702384414785536