How Many Papers Should Scientists Be Reviewing? An Analysis Using Verified Peer Review Reports
The current peer review system is under stress from ever increasing numbers of publications, the proliferation of open-access journals and an apparent difficulty in obtaining high-quality reviews in due time. At its core, this issue may be caused by scientists insufficiently prioritising reviewing....
Main Author: | Vincent Raoult |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Publications |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/8/1/4 |
Similar Items
-
Peer review golden rules and good practice checklist
by: Irene Hames
Published: (2016-02-01) -
The peer review process
by: Dmitry Tumin, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals
by: Catherine H. Davis, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01) -
Author Role in Online Submission and Peer Review Systems of Iranian Medical Journals
by: Fereydoun Azadeh, et al.
Published: (2015-10-01) -
Academic Publishing: A Faustian Bargain?
by: Grant Samkin
Published: (2011-03-01)