Comparison of SF6 and CF4 Plasma Treatment for Surface Hydrophobization of PET Polymer

The fluorination of the polymer polyethylene terephthalate in plasma created from SF6 or CF4 gas at various pressures was investigated. The surface was analysed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and water contact angle measurements, whereas the plasma was characterized by optical emission spectros...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matic Resnik, Rok Zaplotnik, Miran Mozetic, Alenka Vesel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-02-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/11/2/311
id doaj-d41f9eab2f704db08797556ff9f6e136
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d41f9eab2f704db08797556ff9f6e1362020-11-24T23:16:17ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442018-02-0111231110.3390/ma11020311ma11020311Comparison of SF6 and CF4 Plasma Treatment for Surface Hydrophobization of PET PolymerMatic Resnik0Rok Zaplotnik1Miran Mozetic2Alenka Vesel3Jozef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Jamova 39, Ljubljana 1000, SloveniaJozef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, Ljubljana 1000, SloveniaJozef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, Ljubljana 1000, SloveniaJozef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, Ljubljana 1000, SloveniaThe fluorination of the polymer polyethylene terephthalate in plasma created from SF6 or CF4 gas at various pressures was investigated. The surface was analysed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and water contact angle measurements, whereas the plasma was characterized by optical emission spectroscopy. The extent of the polymer surface fluorination was dependent on the pressure. Up to a threshold pressure, the amount of fluorine on the polymer surface and the surface hydrophobicity were similar, which was explained by the full dissociation of the SF6 and CF4 gases, leading to high concentrations of fluorine radicals in the plasma and thus causing the saturation of the polymer surface with fluorine functional groups. Above the threshold pressure, the amount of fluorine on the polymer surface significantly decreased, whereas the oxygen concentration increased, leading to the formation of the hydrophilic surface. This effect, which was more pronounced for the SF6 plasma, was explained by the electronegativity of both gases.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/11/2/311sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) plasmatetrafluoromethane (CF4) plasmapolymer polyethylene terephthalate (PET)surface modificationfunctionalization and wettabilityoptical emission spectroscopy (OES)electronegativity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matic Resnik
Rok Zaplotnik
Miran Mozetic
Alenka Vesel
spellingShingle Matic Resnik
Rok Zaplotnik
Miran Mozetic
Alenka Vesel
Comparison of SF6 and CF4 Plasma Treatment for Surface Hydrophobization of PET Polymer
Materials
sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) plasma
tetrafluoromethane (CF4) plasma
polymer polyethylene terephthalate (PET)
surface modification
functionalization and wettability
optical emission spectroscopy (OES)
electronegativity
author_facet Matic Resnik
Rok Zaplotnik
Miran Mozetic
Alenka Vesel
author_sort Matic Resnik
title Comparison of SF6 and CF4 Plasma Treatment for Surface Hydrophobization of PET Polymer
title_short Comparison of SF6 and CF4 Plasma Treatment for Surface Hydrophobization of PET Polymer
title_full Comparison of SF6 and CF4 Plasma Treatment for Surface Hydrophobization of PET Polymer
title_fullStr Comparison of SF6 and CF4 Plasma Treatment for Surface Hydrophobization of PET Polymer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of SF6 and CF4 Plasma Treatment for Surface Hydrophobization of PET Polymer
title_sort comparison of sf6 and cf4 plasma treatment for surface hydrophobization of pet polymer
publisher MDPI AG
series Materials
issn 1996-1944
publishDate 2018-02-01
description The fluorination of the polymer polyethylene terephthalate in plasma created from SF6 or CF4 gas at various pressures was investigated. The surface was analysed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and water contact angle measurements, whereas the plasma was characterized by optical emission spectroscopy. The extent of the polymer surface fluorination was dependent on the pressure. Up to a threshold pressure, the amount of fluorine on the polymer surface and the surface hydrophobicity were similar, which was explained by the full dissociation of the SF6 and CF4 gases, leading to high concentrations of fluorine radicals in the plasma and thus causing the saturation of the polymer surface with fluorine functional groups. Above the threshold pressure, the amount of fluorine on the polymer surface significantly decreased, whereas the oxygen concentration increased, leading to the formation of the hydrophilic surface. This effect, which was more pronounced for the SF6 plasma, was explained by the electronegativity of both gases.
topic sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) plasma
tetrafluoromethane (CF4) plasma
polymer polyethylene terephthalate (PET)
surface modification
functionalization and wettability
optical emission spectroscopy (OES)
electronegativity
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/11/2/311
work_keys_str_mv AT maticresnik comparisonofsf6andcf4plasmatreatmentforsurfacehydrophobizationofpetpolymer
AT rokzaplotnik comparisonofsf6andcf4plasmatreatmentforsurfacehydrophobizationofpetpolymer
AT miranmozetic comparisonofsf6andcf4plasmatreatmentforsurfacehydrophobizationofpetpolymer
AT alenkavesel comparisonofsf6andcf4plasmatreatmentforsurfacehydrophobizationofpetpolymer
_version_ 1725587768360304640