Estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trends
Abstract Background The risk of a disease or psychiatric disorder is frequently measured by the age-specific cumulative incidence. Cumulative incidence estimates are often derived in cohort studies with individuals recruited over calendar time and with the end of follow-up governed by a specific dat...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-016-0280-6 |
id |
doaj-d4718dcc9bcf4a95800cf3dd67f222fb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d4718dcc9bcf4a95800cf3dd67f222fb2020-11-24T23:43:17ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882017-01-0117111010.1186/s12874-016-0280-6Estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trendsStefan N. Hansen0Morten Overgaard1Per K. Andersen2Erik T. Parner3Section for Biostatistics, Aarhus UniversitySection for Biostatistics, Aarhus UniversitySection of Biostatistics, University of CopenhagenSection for Biostatistics, Aarhus UniversityAbstract Background The risk of a disease or psychiatric disorder is frequently measured by the age-specific cumulative incidence. Cumulative incidence estimates are often derived in cohort studies with individuals recruited over calendar time and with the end of follow-up governed by a specific date. It is common practice to apply the Kaplan–Meier or Aalen–Johansen estimator to the total sample and report either the estimated cumulative incidence curve or just a single point on the curve as a description of the disease risk. Methods We argue that, whenever the disease or disorder of interest is influenced by calendar time trends, the total sample Kaplan–Meier and Aalen–Johansen estimators do not provide useful estimates of the general risk in the target population. We present some alternatives to this type of analysis. Results We show how a proportional hazards model may be used to extrapolate disease risk estimates if proportionality is a reasonable assumption. If not reasonable, we instead advocate that a more useful description of the disease risk lies in the age-specific cumulative incidence curves across strata given by time of entry or perhaps just the end of follow-up estimates across all strata. Finally, we argue that a weighted average of these end of follow-up estimates may be a useful summary measure of the disease risk within the study period. Conclusions Time trends in a disease risk will render total sample estimators less useful in observational studies with staggered entry and administrative censoring. An analysis based on proportional hazards or a stratified analysis may be better alternatives.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-016-0280-6Cumulative incidenceTime to eventDependent censoringStratificationTime trends |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stefan N. Hansen Morten Overgaard Per K. Andersen Erik T. Parner |
spellingShingle |
Stefan N. Hansen Morten Overgaard Per K. Andersen Erik T. Parner Estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trends BMC Medical Research Methodology Cumulative incidence Time to event Dependent censoring Stratification Time trends |
author_facet |
Stefan N. Hansen Morten Overgaard Per K. Andersen Erik T. Parner |
author_sort |
Stefan N. Hansen |
title |
Estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trends |
title_short |
Estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trends |
title_full |
Estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trends |
title_fullStr |
Estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trends |
title_full_unstemmed |
Estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trends |
title_sort |
estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trends |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Medical Research Methodology |
issn |
1471-2288 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The risk of a disease or psychiatric disorder is frequently measured by the age-specific cumulative incidence. Cumulative incidence estimates are often derived in cohort studies with individuals recruited over calendar time and with the end of follow-up governed by a specific date. It is common practice to apply the Kaplan–Meier or Aalen–Johansen estimator to the total sample and report either the estimated cumulative incidence curve or just a single point on the curve as a description of the disease risk. Methods We argue that, whenever the disease or disorder of interest is influenced by calendar time trends, the total sample Kaplan–Meier and Aalen–Johansen estimators do not provide useful estimates of the general risk in the target population. We present some alternatives to this type of analysis. Results We show how a proportional hazards model may be used to extrapolate disease risk estimates if proportionality is a reasonable assumption. If not reasonable, we instead advocate that a more useful description of the disease risk lies in the age-specific cumulative incidence curves across strata given by time of entry or perhaps just the end of follow-up estimates across all strata. Finally, we argue that a weighted average of these end of follow-up estimates may be a useful summary measure of the disease risk within the study period. Conclusions Time trends in a disease risk will render total sample estimators less useful in observational studies with staggered entry and administrative censoring. An analysis based on proportional hazards or a stratified analysis may be better alternatives. |
topic |
Cumulative incidence Time to event Dependent censoring Stratification Time trends |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-016-0280-6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stefannhansen estimatingapopulationcumulativeincidenceundercalendartimetrends AT mortenovergaard estimatingapopulationcumulativeincidenceundercalendartimetrends AT perkandersen estimatingapopulationcumulativeincidenceundercalendartimetrends AT eriktparner estimatingapopulationcumulativeincidenceundercalendartimetrends |
_version_ |
1725502187559190528 |