Estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trends

Abstract Background The risk of a disease or psychiatric disorder is frequently measured by the age-specific cumulative incidence. Cumulative incidence estimates are often derived in cohort studies with individuals recruited over calendar time and with the end of follow-up governed by a specific dat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefan N. Hansen, Morten Overgaard, Per K. Andersen, Erik T. Parner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-01-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-016-0280-6
id doaj-d4718dcc9bcf4a95800cf3dd67f222fb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d4718dcc9bcf4a95800cf3dd67f222fb2020-11-24T23:43:17ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882017-01-0117111010.1186/s12874-016-0280-6Estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trendsStefan N. Hansen0Morten Overgaard1Per K. Andersen2Erik T. Parner3Section for Biostatistics, Aarhus UniversitySection for Biostatistics, Aarhus UniversitySection of Biostatistics, University of CopenhagenSection for Biostatistics, Aarhus UniversityAbstract Background The risk of a disease or psychiatric disorder is frequently measured by the age-specific cumulative incidence. Cumulative incidence estimates are often derived in cohort studies with individuals recruited over calendar time and with the end of follow-up governed by a specific date. It is common practice to apply the Kaplan–Meier or Aalen–Johansen estimator to the total sample and report either the estimated cumulative incidence curve or just a single point on the curve as a description of the disease risk. Methods We argue that, whenever the disease or disorder of interest is influenced by calendar time trends, the total sample Kaplan–Meier and Aalen–Johansen estimators do not provide useful estimates of the general risk in the target population. We present some alternatives to this type of analysis. Results We show how a proportional hazards model may be used to extrapolate disease risk estimates if proportionality is a reasonable assumption. If not reasonable, we instead advocate that a more useful description of the disease risk lies in the age-specific cumulative incidence curves across strata given by time of entry or perhaps just the end of follow-up estimates across all strata. Finally, we argue that a weighted average of these end of follow-up estimates may be a useful summary measure of the disease risk within the study period. Conclusions Time trends in a disease risk will render total sample estimators less useful in observational studies with staggered entry and administrative censoring. An analysis based on proportional hazards or a stratified analysis may be better alternatives.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-016-0280-6Cumulative incidenceTime to eventDependent censoringStratificationTime trends
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stefan N. Hansen
Morten Overgaard
Per K. Andersen
Erik T. Parner
spellingShingle Stefan N. Hansen
Morten Overgaard
Per K. Andersen
Erik T. Parner
Estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trends
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Cumulative incidence
Time to event
Dependent censoring
Stratification
Time trends
author_facet Stefan N. Hansen
Morten Overgaard
Per K. Andersen
Erik T. Parner
author_sort Stefan N. Hansen
title Estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trends
title_short Estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trends
title_full Estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trends
title_fullStr Estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trends
title_full_unstemmed Estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trends
title_sort estimating a population cumulative incidence under calendar time trends
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
issn 1471-2288
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Abstract Background The risk of a disease or psychiatric disorder is frequently measured by the age-specific cumulative incidence. Cumulative incidence estimates are often derived in cohort studies with individuals recruited over calendar time and with the end of follow-up governed by a specific date. It is common practice to apply the Kaplan–Meier or Aalen–Johansen estimator to the total sample and report either the estimated cumulative incidence curve or just a single point on the curve as a description of the disease risk. Methods We argue that, whenever the disease or disorder of interest is influenced by calendar time trends, the total sample Kaplan–Meier and Aalen–Johansen estimators do not provide useful estimates of the general risk in the target population. We present some alternatives to this type of analysis. Results We show how a proportional hazards model may be used to extrapolate disease risk estimates if proportionality is a reasonable assumption. If not reasonable, we instead advocate that a more useful description of the disease risk lies in the age-specific cumulative incidence curves across strata given by time of entry or perhaps just the end of follow-up estimates across all strata. Finally, we argue that a weighted average of these end of follow-up estimates may be a useful summary measure of the disease risk within the study period. Conclusions Time trends in a disease risk will render total sample estimators less useful in observational studies with staggered entry and administrative censoring. An analysis based on proportional hazards or a stratified analysis may be better alternatives.
topic Cumulative incidence
Time to event
Dependent censoring
Stratification
Time trends
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-016-0280-6
work_keys_str_mv AT stefannhansen estimatingapopulationcumulativeincidenceundercalendartimetrends
AT mortenovergaard estimatingapopulationcumulativeincidenceundercalendartimetrends
AT perkandersen estimatingapopulationcumulativeincidenceundercalendartimetrends
AT eriktparner estimatingapopulationcumulativeincidenceundercalendartimetrends
_version_ 1725502187559190528